FDA considers approving genetically modified salmon for human consumption

[Robbien]

Source: Washington Post

The Food and Drug Administration is poised to approve the first genetically modified animal for human consumption, a highly anticipated decision that is stirring controversy and could mark a turning point in the way American food is produced.


FDA scientists gave a boost last week to the Massachusetts company that wants federal approval to market a genetically engineered salmon, declaring that the altered salmon is safe to eat and does not pose a threat to the environment.

. . .

AquAdvantage is an Atlantic salmon that has been given a gene from the ocean pout, an eel-like fish, which allows the salmon to grow twice as fast as a traditional Atlantic salmon. It also contains a growth hormone from a Chinook salmon.

. . .

But independent scientists, consumer groups and environmental organizations are concerned about both the pending decision and the process that the FDA uses to determine whether the genetically modified fish is safe for human health and the environment.

The agency is evaluating the fish as if it were a new veterinary drug, which means the FDA's deliberations are behind closed doors and that AquaBounty can claim much of the research and other supporting data it supplies to the FDA is confidential.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/06/AR2010090602424.html

---

The FDA spokeswoman said "We do have obligations under the regulations to protect company confidential information"

The FDA spokeswoman made no statement anywhere saying that they have any obligation to protect the public from high risk foods. Not part of their job description I guess.

[midnight]

1. Why does this sound like a bad idea? Is it the whole idea of protecting the

company Vs the consumer? Or could it be that the monsanto attorney is now working in tandem with the FDA to "protect" our food?

[on point]

2. Something else not to buy.