Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What it means if the taxcuts do not expire?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 02:57 PM
Original message
What it means if the taxcuts do not expire?
Edited on Wed Sep-08-10 02:59 PM by kentuck
It means we will not have enough revenue to run our government and the deficits will continue to grow out of control or spending cuts will have to be made to all programs, social and otherwise. Our country will deteriorate rapidly.

We will not have enough money for our infrastructure. We will not have enough money for Social Security or other social programs. We will not have enough money to educate our children. We will not have the basic necessities for a civilized country.

It is a basic truth that there is no free lunch. Taxes are what we pay for a civilized society. We put our money together because no one person or group can afford what the people as a whole might need.

It means that the very wealthiest people will accrue more and more of the wealth of the country and the lower working class will expand exponentially as more and more of the middle class disappear. We are seeing it already. If we do not turn it around, it will get much, much worse.

It is not just about "fairness", it is about what kind of country do we want? That is what the taxcuts mean to all of America. We must have a progressive income tax or we will all lose. That is the bottom line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Then rich =
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. tell me that's fake. please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's fake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think in the long run taxes will go up for everyone by quite a bit.
We all need to plan for that day and make sure we do not over extend ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. If wages are once again tied to production...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It was the devaluation of labor.
Our value is defined by the cheapest sum a person will work for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. true..
and if the wages were tied to production as they were from the 1940's to the late 1970's, then we all could pay more in taxes. I would love to be in the top tax bracket. I promise you I would not complain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Gee, maybe we should cut defense.
:nopity: :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. That would be a good start...
If it had to be paid for by higher taxes, then I doubt that we would be in Afghanistan or Iraq today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. You must be glad that Obama has agreed with this progressive position all along
and never given any indication of wavering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC