Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's approval rating among no-college whites is about 30%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 05:33 PM
Original message
Obama's approval rating among no-college whites is about 30%
Edited on Wed Sep-08-10 05:34 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
In populist terms the white working class should be part of our base but is quite the opposite... kind of the anti-base.

Most racism is not crude and simple, like "I would never vote for a black person."

More like, "I would vote for a black man to be president but would be less patient with him and quicker to find fault because I am somewhat alienated from him... lacking the kind of empathy I had for Reagan or Bill Clinton."

Few voters would flat out say that sort of thing but I think it's an accurate description of the phenomenon.

Either way, they are people we need. Not to outright win the demographic, but to keep it from being a monolith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think that's a valid point. The RW spinsters have gone to great lengths to exploit
the "differences" in Obama and to touch some latent racism nerves. That 30% of folks likely sincerely believe they aren't racist--but can they be convinced they are being explouited by those without their best interests at heart?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. "Spinster" is an antiquated, sexist term.
Oh, wait...what? Nevermind.:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Tue. I tend to let my stupidity stand even tho I could edit. OTOH,
I'm a longtime Spinners fan, so :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I've done it myself many times.
That's why it causes me such glee when someone else does it.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's due, as much as anything else, to the embrace of corporate types by Dem leaders since '92
Only in the last couple of years has labor been let back in(a little) from the cold. Only very recently has our party's TOP brass(as opposed to the majority of Dem Congressmembers and Senators)been willing to admit that it's at least possible that backing "free trade" was a mistake and a betrayal of people who work for a living.

We need to be a party that backs the workers, not the bosses. The fact is, a "pro-business Democrat" is just a Republican with good manners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Why then do Democrats have the strong support of working
class voters from other racial and ethnic groups? I think racism plays a LARGE role among that constituency. Dems and the GOP spend a lot of time pandering to them. When everyone talks about the "working man" and "average Joe" (whether from the left or right) it means a white person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yeah, we went through this during the election. "Average American" means "white"
Edited on Wed Sep-08-10 06:05 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. ROFL. Yeah right. That's why they vote Republican.
Edited on Wed Sep-08-10 06:02 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
The Republicans who have *never* embraced corporatism...truly friend of the working man. All of us dumb working minorities are just to stupid to realize it.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I agree that Republicans don't DESERVE their votes
But our party has driven them away through the leadership's embrace of "free trade" and through acting like nothing can be done to protect U.S. industrial jobs. The GOP then gets their votes by pretending to care.

OUR party needs to fight for workers FOR REAL. That means breaking with globalization and fighting for Fair Trade instead. Only then can you get these people back, because a Democratic Party that allows "free trade" deals to go through likes like it cares about everybody else EXCEPT workers.

Globalization was never good for anybody who doesn't vote straight-ticket GOP and live in a mansion. Our party needs to include Rust Belt workers again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. And magically only the white workers have been driven away, huh?
Funny that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. They've been seduced by racism
Edited on Wed Sep-08-10 06:44 PM by Ken Burch
because the GOP has been able to use it to direct white working-class anger away from their true enemies, the corporations.

And yes, other groups of workers did stay with this party, but only because our leaders pretended to care about them(like the last Democratic president, who had massive black and latino support but did nothing whatsoever to earn it).

The Democrats were unable to combat this loss of working-class whites because our party, since the Nineties(actually, since the end of the New Deal, in some respects)has been obsessed with looking "pro-business".

We've looked like we stood for progress for everyone EXCEPT this group of workers, to whom our leaders have pretty much said "tough beansies"(or "I feel your pain", which was the same thing).

We need to include them by having a strong anti-corporate message. That's the only way to get them back. You can't get those voters by appealing to altruism.

And I'm a strong supporter of the anti-racist part of the Democratic message. I'm just saying it needs to be accompanied by a class-conscious one as well. That's the only way to break the false consciousness that Republicans have cultivated in this group of voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Hmm, I see what you are saying now.
Thanks for taking the time to explain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. No problem.
What I've been saying is pretty much what Michael Moore's been saying since the Nineties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
45. Lord have mercy
That's the longest most painful attempt to find a reason for something other than the most painfully obvious one -- derrr, it's RACISM, Blanche! -- that I think I've ever seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. Which was a reaction to working class people leaving the Democratic Party in the 1980's
They left the party long before the DLC existed. White working class people are some of the most reliable Republican and thus the least persuadable voters in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
40. Ludicrous reasoning
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. "No-college whites"
That's a great name for this demographic! Thanks.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Pollsters usually distinguish...
no college, some college, and college degree (and graduate degree) in their demographic questions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. It has a nice ring to it. I'm gonna use it quite a lot, seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Is it the same as the target audience for FOX?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. No, I think that's Short Bus Whites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Clinton and Reagan found themselves in the same hole at this point
in their presidencies. I don't have the data here, but it would seem for Clinton to be down to the 40% approval range, he would have to be doing considerably worse among whites, especially no-college whites, probably in the same range Obama finds himself today. So I don't how much of the dynamic is racial vs partisanship/reaction to the bad economy.

And despite any lack of empathy midway through their first terms, things turned out for those presidents as the economy turned around.

As a group, these voters are probably among the most sensitive to the 9.6% unemployment rate, and they likely won't come back into the fold until it is considerably lower.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. But Clinton lost his majority in '94.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. You make an excellent point (in contradiction to my OP)
Obama's approval rating is probably higher than Clinton or Ronnie's was.

On the other hand, Obama's support with AA voters is even more monolithic than Clinton and there are a lot more hispanic voters.

???

I have argued both sides of this... the racism is overt but the overall effect is that of typical Dem-hating.

My theory is that Obama's ethnicity both helps and hurts in polls. He gets a few points from people not wanting to sound racist, loses a few from semi-swing voters made unreachable due to racism and it all adds up to pretty much what any Dem would face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inenemyterritory Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. I doubt (hopefully)
it is not regarding race.

My thought is that these are mostly the "middle class" working people who has had their job shipped overseas.

Maybe manufacturing workers or union members, etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. I wonder if the same is true of a few popular pundits.
I have to think about someone like Dave Sirota or Tom Tomorrow who supported John Edwards in the primary, despite his centrist record and being the DLC leader in the Senate. They were never nearly so forgiving of Obama who had a more liberal platform and voting record. I don't know how to describe their double standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. A main reason for this is related to the ongoing gender discussions.
Edited on Wed Sep-08-10 06:30 PM by lumberjack_jeff
The other is our refusal to speak in economic-populist terms.

By no reasonable measure are they privileged, and they know it. They've been alienated by the Democratic party.

The approval rating for Hillary, Edwards or Kucinich would be no better. They hate Obama because he's a Democrat.

DU is a microcosm of the party. Our systematic dismissal of working class men is pervasive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. I don't get race out of this -- I get disappointment in governance. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. It's just a big coincidence & white people apparently disappoint more easily than everyone else?
Edited on Wed Sep-08-10 08:16 PM by SemiCharmedQuark
Come on...

Obama's numbers with this group were always low. How do you explain this by "disappointment in government" when it started during the election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
41. Bizarre economic theories - thumbs up! Obvious racial bias - don't get it?
It's all about bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
26. I suspect no-college white MALES skew that percentage downward
I also suspect no-college white males are responsible for most of the hate and bigotry we see in America, and wonder if there is a correlation between the two.

I include college dropouts in the 'no-college white males' category. The college dropouts are worse, in my opinion, because they are quitters and threw away opportunities that most deserving humans will never get. There are five no-college-dropout white males on the left in the pic below. The two dudes on the right graduated college, in business and *ahem* law:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
27. Conservatism appeals to people who feel entitled to advantages over others
Edited on Wed Sep-08-10 07:09 PM by rucky
because they were born white
because they were born male
because they were born straight
because they were raised Christian

When times are tough, people ask "why me?" Things are supposed to be easier for them because of those birthrights, but they're not so much anymore - thanks to government and progressivism. Government (in theory) is the equalizer and therefore the enemy. Liberals fight for equality, and so we're taking away their birthright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Funny, I was born all of those things...
And I'm one of further left posters here on DU. Indeed you could even call me a "professional leftist" and have me drug tested.

Perhaps you should narrow your brush just a touch, you're smearing the paint something awful.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Do you feel entitled because of it?
Didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. I feel entitled to be treated the same as anyone else..
Is there another group other than white males that you can paint with as broad a brush as you did on DU and not get called on it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Oh for shit sake, I'm one, too.
Unbunch thy panties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Hmm.. I catch shit from my fellow white males here in red state hell..
For being a liberal..

Then I catch shit from my fellow liberals for being a white male..

I'm starting to understand why so many white males are not liberal, it's a tough row to hoe.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. Read the first word of my first comment.
And tell my why you're choosing to take it personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. If you had stopped with the first word of your first comment we wouldn't be having this conversation
It was the rest of the comment that I found distasteful and overly broad.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
28. Do they provide a figure for his rating among no-account sons of a bitch?
Edited on Wed Sep-08-10 07:07 PM by slackmaster
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
31. Hardly the group you want to impress or care about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Yep, and they recognize that you don't give a shit about them..
Then they vote for your opponent..

It's funny how that works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. Those bitter clingers are just durn vengeful. They should accept
the fact they don't matter and vote Democratic. It's their duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #33
46. Not always, they can be easily brought back by what you put on "da TeeVee"
You see the president talking over and over about a construction bill that will never come to a vote. We don't need it to come to a vote we just need it talked about On their "TeeVees."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
38. Where did you get this statistic? When was the poll? Do you have a LINK?
It's difficult to make sense of a poll result for one subgroup out of many, with no information about possible biases of a particular poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
42. Shit like this makes me wish I had taken a month off from DU..sheesh..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC