Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One in three Indians 'utterly corrupt': Former CVC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
johnroshan Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 09:10 AM
Original message
One in three Indians 'utterly corrupt': Former CVC
Almost one-third of Indians are "utterly corrupt" and half are "borderline", the outgoing head of the country's corruption watchdog has said, blaming increased wealth for much of the problem.

Pratyush Sinha, who retired as India's Central Vigilance Commissioner this week, said the worst part of his "thankless job" was observing how corruption had increased as people became more materialistic.

"When we were growing up I remember if somebody was corrupt, they were generally looked down upon," he said. "There was at least some social stigma attached to it. That is gone. So there is greater social acceptance."


Almost one-third of Indians are "utterly corrupt" and half are "borderline", the outgoing head of the country's corruption watchdog has said, blaming increased wealth for much of the problem.

To hear this coming from a retiring anti corruption officer, I can't help but feel depressed about the sad state of affairs. I for one, don't see any plausible steps to solve this problem. There is no way this situation is going to change top down. Bottom up, grassroots level change is required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. A stage they are going through
Groups of people mature, just as individuals do. When your group is so poor they only have one pot to piss in, people take turns and wait for their turn and learn how to share. When the group has a moderate level of wealth, there is plenty of snatching and grabbing, just to help establish the social hierarchy. When the group is flooded with an excess of a commodity and can't give it away (say for example stray cats), then there is no need to fight over it and people that collect such excess are thought of as eccentric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You're assuming that India was pure as the driven snow before there was wealth?
Edited on Thu Sep-09-10 02:22 PM by The Backlash Cometh
Can people be that naive? I grew up in a Central American country and I wouldn't make that claim. If I had to make a sweeping generalization it would be that the outer areas were able to hold onto their pure communities longer than the communities in the big city.

As for India, where do you get the idea that they were starting out right using a caste system? At least in South America, wherever the Catholic religion was most successful, there was an understanding that the poor must be taken care of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Much further back
Most hunter-gatherer societies are pretty egalitarian and look after the less able members of the tribe. Especially if they don't have domesticated draft animals to carry their stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vehl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. not really
Edited on Thu Sep-09-10 03:10 PM by Vehl

"As for India, where do you get the idea that they were starting out right using a caste system? At least in South America, wherever the Catholic religion was most successful, there was an understanding that the poor must be taken care of."


The caste system is no more and no less worse than the feudal system of Europe. The very same feudal system which was actively supported by the Christian clergy in Europe.


So is it a-ok to say that Christianity supports the feudal system? nope...people who at times hold power in the name of Christianity supported the feudal system, not Christianity per se. The same could be said about Hinduism...Hinduism does not support caste based discrimination, but some people do.


Actually, speaking of wealth, till the late 1700s(and the subsequent colonialism) India and China made up more than half the world's GDP.This changed drastically the moment India became a colony.


as for the topic in general..no one denies that corruption is a huge problem in developing nations, but i really doubt that nearly 700million people(as per the claim made by this official) are corrupt/and or supportive of it. This seems to be a gross generalization. Maybe a lot of companies/traders this particular official knew of might have been that way, but to extrapolate the same percentage to the entire population based on such a small slice seems to be a highly dubious way of making a statement, to say the least.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Anyone heard this stuff before?
It's new to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Read "Maximum City" by Suketu Mehta.
The whole system runs on graft and bribery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC