nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-10 08:39 PM
Original message |
| Disastrous defense of DADT |
|
perhaps they wanted to lose...
Give me some tinfoil...
|
| The Hitman
(477 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-10 08:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It would be much easier than going through congress!
|
| nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-10 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. Yeah and she just read some of the court decision |
|
that is not a DOJ that wants to defend a policy.
|
| The Hitman
(477 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-10 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. Yeah -- no witnesses!? |
|
WTF? As much as I hate DADT, that kind of half-assedness is at the level of legal malpractice.
No excuse for that.
|
| nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-10 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. I am sure they skirted the edges |
| USArmyParatrooper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. I haven't read up on the defense but... IS it tinfoil? |
|
I know the attorneys representing Prop 8 didn't exactly do a bang up job.
|
| nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-10-10 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. DOJ does not do that usually. |
|
Most folks hate to go to bat against the DOJ.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:52 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
