Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats are afraid of the word "taxes"...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 10:12 AM
Original message
Democrats are afraid of the word "taxes"...
It is reported that they believe simply saying the word hurts them.

It doesn't matter if the talk is about raising taxes on the millionaires and giving taxcuts to the middle-class. Nope! They are afraid to touch the subject.

These are the people that are representing us.

Can you even imagine a bigger group of Chicken Littles?

If the Repubs say they are for killing babies to control the growth in population, some Democrats will say, "Me too, but we need to study the long-term impact it will have on families." They are afraid to take a stand on anything.

Why?

Because it is about their "careers". They do not see their elections as temporary. They see them as affirmation for the continuation of their careers.

After all, many or most of them are making more money than they have ever made in their lives and they have all the benefits of power. They cling to their positions as if their lives depended on them. What would they do if they were not in Congress? Yeah, they could get a job with the folks that give them big contributions but then they would be expected to actually do something.

Makes one think that maybe term-limits is not such a bad idea, after all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe
People are getting tired of paying for bullshit like African genital washing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. ??
explain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. we actually spent $800k of taxpayer money
to teach African men how to wash their penises after sex

I wish I were kidding

But dozens of people worked all year to pay those taxes in order to fund this nonsense

Go look it up "African genital washing"... if it doesn't piss you off then I don't know what more I can say

But if we have money to spend on that sort of thing we look pretty damn cruel to be asking for more. People need money to spend on food and keeping a roof over their heads and clothes on their backs, but DC doesn't care.

That money isn't even being spent in the US to be further circulated, it's just gone.

While this is an extreme example, and not much money in and of itself, it takes merely time and no special effort to come up with a list of trillions of dollars that DC carelessly pours down the sewer.

Washington DC telling the people, we're taking your money and doing what we please, and your needs are secondary if they are on the agenda at all.

That era is over, people are fed up, and the party not getting this is way above and beyond anything else why we are going to get wiped out in November.

I tried to tell you people, but so many here don't understand money, proportion/numbers, and plain old common sense - it's like talking to a brick wall. People here living in fantasy land where the amount of money that gets spent doesn't matter, well surprise surprise that people don't like it when they turn around and say oh, we can fix the budget disaster by taxing more. We hit the practical limit of taxation already, can't get blood from a stone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. Do you have a list of Dems who are afraid of the word "taxes"? Is it a 100 Dems or is it 4?
Edited on Thu Sep-16-10 10:46 AM by emulatorloo
Is it 1000 or 6?

I heard that "report" too, it was a little snide aside, there was no substance. Nor any suggestion that the people who believed it were going to effect anything about the way forward.

And there was certainly no suggestion that it was a MAJORITY of DEMS, Or that the people who thought that had any power.

Don't mean to be harsh, but I am in a bit of a bad mood about DU locking on to some statement and then going nuts over it. Especially if it is not "nut worthy"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I assume it is a very small number?
However, if it is just one or two, that is significant, in my opinion.

Because we only hear reports that the caucus met and "some" Democrats wanted to extend the Bush taxcuts for everyone. They seldom say who or how many. Only that it is holding up a decision on the matter.

I don't want anybody to go "nuts" over it, not like Christine O'Donnell, but I do believe it is something we should be aware of and we should be concerned about. Just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Agreed, and I always enjoy reading your opinion!
I think Pelosi can get this done. Reid has more challenges with Liebermann etc. A lot of good stuff has come out of the House and then been derailed in the Senate over procedural crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. the Dems are scared of lots words: "guns", "choice", "taxes", "insurance"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. But why?
is what I question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gaedel Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Walter Mondale
He promised to raise taxes in 1984 and look what happened to him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Probably right but...
different time and different circumstances. Seems like they don't trust the people to know the difference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC