Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Microsoft's WINNING STRATEGY for Internet Explorer 9? "Compatible only with Windows 7 and Vista."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 05:29 PM
Original message
Microsoft's WINNING STRATEGY for Internet Explorer 9? "Compatible only with Windows 7 and Vista."
The latest version of Microsoft's web browser, Internet Explorer 9 Beta, is available for download today, and the update, dubbed the "most ambitious browser release Microsoft has ever undertaken" by ZDNet, is being scrutinized closely.

Internet Explorer 9 Beta has gotten a major makeover, a host of new features, and speedier performance. It is still a beta, however, and, as PC World notes, there are a few "rough spots." Microsoft is expected to release a polished version sometime later this year or in early 2011, according to Wired.

Take a look at what reviewers, such as Wired, Technologizer, PC World, and ZDNet, are saying about Internet Explorer 9 in the slideshow below. (You can download Internet Explorer 9 Beta here. Note: It is compatible only with WIndows 7 and Windows Vista, )

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/15/internet-explorer-9-beta-_1_n_718000.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's the beta version. I am sure the full release will be available for all
Windows formats. I use firefox and safari anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I didn't think MS is interested in adapting this for XP.
If anything, they want XP users to upgrade. This will be another step in gently coercing them to do just that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. I love my xp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I plan on never getting rid of my xp. LOL What are the chances of that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digitaln3rd Donating Member (533 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. It won't.
It relies on DX10, which is incompatible with Windows XP.

Don't understand why they'd want to limit their audience to just Vista/7 but it doesn't really concern me as I'm on a Mac.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. XP users not a likely audience anyway
Writing the program to be compatible with XP would result in a compromised version for Vista/7. Sometimes you just can't support old technology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I wasn't sure about that...the article did state it explicitly
I pretty much use every Web browser because I design sites for a living, among other things. Firefox is my primary but I have to view the sites in IE too...multiple versions, in fact. I have Versions 5.5, 6, 7 & 8 installed. Wish I didn't, but I.E. 6 is notorious for incompatibility issues and I have clients who still use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. I like the paperclip that comes up and says, "You appear to be searching for porn." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. LOL n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. could care less...I'm all about firefox n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
22. Same here.
I was slammed with so much spyware and viruses from IE that I switched several years back, and I have no regrets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
30. Me three, with a side dish of Opera!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. No thanks, Microschlock
Instead of releasing more and more bloatware operating systems that take more and more elaborate hardware to support it, Microschlock needs to re release WinXP, especially for the home user like me who has a lot of stuff that simply won't run on Win7. It's all stuff I need, so forget about upgrading. I'll be downgrading, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbixby Donating Member (716 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
29. Unfortunately that's the march of progress
XP was a great operating system, but as it was written it can't take advantage of most of the new hardware out there, so you're stuck with a max of 2GB of memory and 2TB of drive space, as well as being unable to take advantage of the 64 bit architecture that all of the new processors use. As long as you plan on keeping your old hardware, that's fine, but hardware developers are really phasing out their compatibility with XP. You have remember that its nearly 10 year old technology. I definitely have to agree that Vista was a terrible operating system, particularly with the way the user interface was set up, but Windows 7 is much, much better.
As far as the software goes, that does suck, but again, its progress, and eventually everyone will be forced to get on the bandwagon. It sucks having to re-buy software and stuff like that, but they can't keep supporting the 32 bit architecture for much longer, since it constrains the performance of computers so much. I've definitely felt the crunch here at work, with having to buy new versions of a lot of old standby software, but that's just the way it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anthroguy101 Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Chrome FTW nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dem mba Donating Member (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
39. agreed
i used firefox for a while because i liked its open framework and ability to customize with extensions. but chrome is easier to use and just a more pleasurable browsing experience.

IE9 can suck it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. meh, i use firefox ... hate explorer! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BellaLuna Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. I really like google chrome
I haven't used IE in years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. A new version of a web browser won't be available for an obsolete OS?
As a proud GEOS user, I'm outraged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
32. I still run GEOS occasionally.
From my desktop:



My computers seem to be immortal. The hardware may be long dead but the software and data live on in virtual reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. I only use Exploder at work
Because most of the sites on the network there require it (MS SharePoint, etc).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. XP support is supposed to end in 2014
At that time, it will be 13 years old. That's pretty long for something like an operating system.

I have to admit, I was prejudiced against Vista, then I acquired a used laptop that had it installed. After some reconfiguring to make sure it didn't ask my permission before I got up to get a sip of water, I find it's not too bad. It's mostly tough finding all of the places they put my old familiar parts of the system, but the help feature's not bad for that.

Yes, it does take a lot of processing power, but that's gotten cheap. I bought the three-year old laptop for a hundred bucks, and souped it up with another $240 for a 640 gig HD and upgrade from one to four gigs of RAM, and it really is the best computer in my home. Including the one that I'm posting this on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. XP until the mf'er shuts down
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyeofdelphi Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. compatible my ass!
this laptop is all i have and it came with vista (which i really really hate). i was checking my email like an hour ago and the box popped up and wanted me to upgrade to explorer 9. so i downloaded it, then it told me it wasn't compatible. wtf? i know i definately have vista cuz i'm always complaining about it. ah well. i don't really care. at least DU is still compatible with my computer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
21. People are still using IE?
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Every day... without a problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. IE pretty much IS the problem.
You might as well put out a sign that says "COME HACK MY SYSTEM" and then go take a dump while you wait for it to do something simple. Damn is it slow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #24
36. Maybe you haven't been paying attention
But there's tons of patches and fixes posted for Firefox and Safari.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #36
45. Yeah, and they actually keep up on things. M$ makes you download the whole fucking Windows Update.
I got really pissed recently because I had to restore a Vista machine and SP1 is no longer available except as the huge corporate download. You need SP1 in order to install SP2 (which you CAN directly download). SP1 put me in a bind. The M$ site said to get it through Windows Update. Windows Update was freezing. The solution to it freezing is to install SP1. The M$ site said to get it through Windows Update. (Continue circular problem).

I happened to need SP1 for another machine as well so I just said fuck it and downloaded the corporate update (with 5 languages). At least it worked, but how much of a problem would it be for M$ to just put SP1 up as an individual download?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. I don't get your complaint
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. Okay, I'm impressed. I spent quite a while looking for that and couldn't find it.
Edited on Sat Sep-18-10 09:57 AM by HopeHoops
The one I ended up with was three times that size and had two warnings of the "DO NOT DOWNLOAD unless you're installing on multiple machines" nature because of the size. It also took forever to install (at least as far as service packs are concerned). SP2 was quick in comparison.

Anyway, thanks for the link. That's a different file and probably contains only the stuff I really want or need. I don't know what happened. The MSDN site used to be so clean and simple to navigate (at least in the NT days). Did a sadist take over operations?

On Edit: I refer to M$ service packs as "fudge packs" most of the time. I've had to fix way too many systems to count where someone installed a fudge pack and it hosed up the machine. The Vista SPs so far haven't caused such problems and Win 7 has been taking care of it on its own. Win 7 is pretty decent for an M$ OS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. I stopped using it years ago.
Edited on Fri Sep-17-10 09:55 AM by Raineyb
:shrug:

Still have to put up with it on my sister's computer. Every time I download Firefox onto her computer her idiot ex keeps removing it. Damn arrogant fuck thinks he knows more about everything than everyone.

On the few occasions when some website refuses to cooperate with Firefox (Young Turks hint hint your video player...) I have an add on that allows me to look at the page as though I were on IE. There's no need for me to even HAVE IE on the computer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. Is it your computer or his computer?
It's pretty obnoxious to install software on someone elses computer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #27
43. Even thought M$ still claims it is a necessary component for Windows.
Edited on Sat Sep-18-10 08:20 AM by HopeHoops
Which is total bullshit. They proved it wasn't necessary to settle a lawsuit in Germany a few years ago.

On Edit: It was M$ that proved it, not someone else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
25. Well, it only makes sense! With Vista, the hardware drivers were changed greatly
Edited on Fri Sep-17-10 09:53 AM by Roland99
I'm really looking forward to my new PC and Windows 7 and IE 9.

We've already done some testing with our internal web app and IE 9 is blowing Firefox away in terms of the Javascript engine. Using the GPU is something they should have done long ago.

And support for CSS 3 finally? Ahhh...look at those beautiful rounded corners!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
26. XP is old and IE is garbage..
I don't understand why anybody is still using either one..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #26
35. XP is reliable and IE works
That's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
28. Why Designers and Developers Should Care About Internet Explorer 9
Why Designers and Developers Should Care About Internet Explorer 9
http://mashable.com/2010/09/15/designers-developer-ie-9/

The new IE 9 is faster and more efficient. In the modern browser wars, JavaScript is becoming the new battleground for speed supremacy. Right now, Google() is really taking charge with its V8 JavaScript engine, but Microsoft isn’t backing down with its new engine, dubbed Chakra.

Chakra is similar to V8 in that it can run JavaScript directly from the processor, rather than through some sort of layer. That means that animations and scripts can run faster and with less overhead.

Chakra has also been optimized for modern hardware, so if you’re running IE 9 on a multi-core Windows() 7 machine, you can really see a big difference in performance, especially when several highly intensive web apps are open at one time.

As we’ve discussed before, Microsoft is also taking charge on making sure IE 9 has support for GPU acceleration. By using the graphics card rather than the CPU to offload things like animations, you can get higher frame rates, more detail and use less processor resources.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
31. And your point caller?
That's the strategy they're using - update or die!

My company has Office 2007 and our email provider gives accounts copies of Outlook. We wanted to try Outlook 2010, but it's "configured" so you can't install it if you have any previous (non-2010) Office apps on your machine.

Now THAT'S being a dick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
33. Change to BSD or Debain, use KDE, FF, Tbird, Open Office and get another 10 years use...
out of your old machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
34. The problem is that it's difficult to advance in technology while you coddle old technology.
Apple figured this out 10 years ago and Microsoft has started to catch up. At some point you have to cut the old stuff loose. Windows XP came out 9 years ago!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
38. Damned if I'm not happy I switched to linux about 6 maybe 8 months ago
I'm running ubuntu 10.10 beta right now and loving it big time.
Microshaft has gotten the last penny out of me, mind you, that is after they soaked me for close to a thousand bucks before I decided enough is enough.

They'll have to pry my cold dead fingers off this linux keyboard is all I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
40. Shit, how long should they support XP losers? Upgrade or stop whining!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Hey, up yours, pal.
Some of us haven't been able to afford a new machine in the last 5 years. If you haven't noticed, we are in a recession.

I have a 7-year-old 2.0Ghz box with 1GB RAM that is running Windows XP just fine doing what I need it to do.

Can't play the latest fancy 3-D games, but I wouldn't expect it to. For general web-browsing, e-mailing, office productivity tasks, it still works just fine.

I use Firefox anyway, so I could care less about IE9.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DAMANgoldberg Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
41. Two Words...
Firefox 4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
44. WHAT! it's not compatible with DOS? HOLY SHIT!
uh things do advance and some things are left better dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC