Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sr Scientist: "rich diversity of species in Gulf” may be replaced with only “JELLYFISH & BACTERIA"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 06:27 AM
Original message
Sr Scientist: "rich diversity of species in Gulf” may be replaced with only “JELLYFISH & BACTERIA"
Edited on Fri Sep-17-10 06:33 AM by nashville_brook
http://www.gainesville.com/article/20100914/ARTICLES/100919661/1118?Title=Panel-says-BP-oil-spill-threatens-Gulf-8217-s-resources

Senior Scientist: “The rich diversity of species in the Gulf” may be replaced with only “JELLYFISH and BACTERIA”
Panel says BP oil spill threatens Gulf’s resources


Florida State University oceanographer Ian MacDonald was one of the first scientists to contradict official estimates of the BP oil spill, correctly saying that more oil was flowing into the Gulf of Mexico than company and government officials had claimed for months after the disaster. He continued questioning the official line Tuesday at the University of Florida, debunking the idea that bacteria had eaten most of the oil. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s official “oil budget” making such claims lacks citations of scientific literature, an outside review of its work and information on the calculations used, he said.

“With no citation, no review and no possibility of replication, it ain’t science,” he said. MacDonald spoke in a panel discussion about the impact of the spill on the region’s natural resources. UF’s Graham Center for Public Service sponsored the event.

Oil-soaked birds may be the iconic image of the BP spill, but marine biologist Edith Widder said equally tragic events occurred offshore out of sight of the public. The spill’s impact extends to aquatic species already on the brink of devastation, she said, such as Atlantic bluefin tuna that spawn in the area affected by the oil. “It isn’t just water. This is part of our living ecosystem,” she said. “And what we have to recognize is this is the life-support system for our planet.”

Widder, senior scientist and CEO at the Ocean Research and Conservation Association, compared the spill to pushing on a light switch. If the switch flips, she said, the rich diversity of species in the Gulf will be replaced by a system in which the only things able to survive are jellyfish and bacteria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. “With no citation, no review and no possibility of replication, it ain’t science,”
It ain't science, it's propaganda, propaganda from BP and the government that they own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. +10000000000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Gulf Dead Zone
Margaret Atwood refers to it as that in The Year of the Flood, which I finished reading a bit ago. She is a psychic if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. atwood has been right-on about many things -- and some i hope she's not right-on about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. The "official" line was not that the "bacteria had eaten most of the oil."
They said about half of it had evaporated or was recovered/skimmed/burned. The other half was in the process of being degraded.

It is unfortunate many, even scientists, choose to change facts to fit their argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC