Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What We've Really Lost in Iraq: Legitimacy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-18-07 09:50 AM
Original message
What We've Really Lost in Iraq: Legitimacy
http://uspolitics.einnews.com/article.php?nid=277248

Do yourself a big favor.

Go to http://www.sais-jhu.edu and click on the speech given the other day by retired General Wesley Clark to an audience at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University.

In just 20 minutes, Clark presented the most cogent case I've yet heard for what the Iraq misadventure has cost America and Americans, and what's needed to clean up the scene of this crime.

Clark titled his speech: "Legitimacy---First Task for America's Security." Here's his core argument: For all the military power the U.S. has at its disposal, the nation's safety and economic strength ultimately depends on maintaining our status as a nation that pursues objectives held in common by most peoples who share the planet:

--The wise and benign use of power
--Defense of human rights
--Protection of civilian populations
--Cooperation with, not intimidation of other nations
--The primacy of the rule of law

All of that, he argues, has been put into question by our nation's behavior in Iraq. And the result has "robbed every American" of his or her heritage and made us all less safe and secure.

Six consecutive Pew polls of those who live in other countries have recorded a declining belief in the historic aims and purposes of the U.S. And that, he says, not only undermines our ability to rally the rest of the world to fight the forces of terror, but has other consequences as well: It weakens our ability to marshal allies to confront Iran; it makes our arguments less persuasive when pressuring the Russians to be less authoritarian and bullying to their neighbors; it compromises our credentials for challenging human rights abuses in China. And so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC