Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congratulations and Good Luck to Elizabeth Warren - Emptywheel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 05:26 PM
Original message
Congratulations and Good Luck to Elizabeth Warren - Emptywheel
Congratulations and Good Luck to Elizabeth Warren
By: emptywheel Friday September 17, 2010 8:37 am

<snip>

I’m cautiously optimistic with the dual appointment of Elizabeth Warren to be Assistant to the President to work at Treasury to set up the Consumer Financial Protection Board.

Frankly, no one knows what this appointment will mean in practice except perhaps Obama, Warren, and Timmeh Geithner. And no one knows how well Warren will negotiate the inevitable bureaucratic battles ahead, particularly with whoever replaces Rahm.

But I’m optimistic for two reasons. First, I have a lot of trust in Warren herself. She’s proven her ability to surprise her opponents in bureaucratic battles thus far. I also suspect (though don’t know for a fact) that she negotiated the Assistant to the President position as protection against anything Timmeh and Larry Summers might try. She seems to have demanded certain things with this nomination. And gotten them. And–as DDay linked earlier–she has expressed confidence that this is a win.

The President asked me, and I enthusiastically agreed, to serve as an Assistant to the President and Special Advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. He has also asked me to take on the job to get the new CFPB started—right now. The President and I are committed to the same vision on CFPB, and I am confident that I will have the tools I need to get the job done.


So given the respect I have for Warren, I take her at her word that she will have the power to make of CFPB what it needs to be.

The other reason I’m cautiously optimistic is because the Chamber of Commerce is screaming like a stuck pig over these developments: http://www.twitlonger.com/show/635v9r Which, in my book, is generally a sign that something good has happened.

All that said, the appointment of Warren just means that both the White House and activists have more work to do. For the White House, not only do they need to fulfill whatever promises they made to Warren. Just as importantly, though, if they don’t actually use the fact that they finally have someone who can speak for and to the middle class (without the kind of gaffes that Joe Biden inevitably makes) to their advantage they will be really hurting themselves. Is Warren booked for the Sunday shows this weekend? If not, why not?

As for the rest of us, one of the reasons I think Warren was successful in negotiating what she sees as a successful resolution to this position is because her broad support was very clear to the White House. A wide group of people made it clear that Warren was the only acceptable candidate for this position.

If we get complacent, it’ll be a lot harder for Warren to do what she’d like to do with the position.

Progressives finally won something from this Administration. Maybe. But we’re only going to be able to keep it if we continue to make noise.

<snip>

Link: http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2010/09/17/congratulations-and-good-luck-to-elizabeth-warren/

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. So the unreccs have started already....
I guess it's too negative to suggest that we continue to make noise so that Warren can get the edge in her inevitable bureaucratic ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. WTH?
Edited on Fri Sep-17-10 05:32 PM by ProSense
Frankly, no one knows what this appointment will mean in practice except perhaps Obama, Warren, and Timmeh Geithner. And no one knows how well Warren will negotiate the inevitable bureaucratic battles ahead, particularly with whoever replaces Rahm.


Really? It's that hard to understand that she's setting up the bureau?

"No one knows how well Warren will negotiate the inevitable bureaucratic battles ahead"?

I thought the reason for pushing Warren was that she was the best and toughest person for the job?

And what the hell does Rahm or his replacement have to do with anything? She reports directly to the President.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Well... The President And Geithner...


Ms. Warren was named an assistant to the president, a designation that is held by senior White House advisers. She also will be a special adviser to the Treasury secretary, Timothy F. Geithner, and report jointly to him and the president.

While Mr. Geithner nodded vigorously in approval as he stood in the Rose Garden with Mr. Obama and Ms. Warren, his dealings with her have been the subject of much speculation. Ms. Warren, as the chairwoman of the Congressional panel that oversees the Troubled Asset Relief Program, has often been critical of Mr. Geithner and his department for the management of the financial rescue program. Privately, Mr. Geithner promoted Mr. Barr for the consumer post.


Under the financial regulation law, Treasury will have the powers delegated to the bureau until a permanent director is nominated and confirmed by the Senate to a five-year term. Next July the bureau will assume the regulatory power for consumer rights now vested in a range of agencies, including the Federal Reserve, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Once a director is confirmed, the bureau can issue regulations and enforce new standards for mortgages, credit cards, payday loans and a wide array of other financial products.


Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/18/us/politics/18warren.html

And... the next chief of staff to the President, whoever that is, gets to determine who sees the president, and who does not. That said... I feel good about this so far.

:shrug:

And that really IS a change!

:hide::evilgrin::hide:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
8.  Simply: No one can tell the future. But we're optimistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Finally, A ray of hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Heartiest congrats and gratitude that you're there for us! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. The very best to Elizabeth Warren. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-10 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Rec 11. Good for the president and great for Ms. Warren. This is great news. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC