|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 11:59 AM Original message |
Do we really want impeachment / President Pelosi? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. YES! Truth matters! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOTV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. If we can get 67 Senators so impeachment can do some good.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 01:47 PM Response to Reply #2 |
31. Regardless if we get a conviction in the Senate, the trial is the right thing to do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
3. If Bush and Cheney are both impeached that does not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost in the Machine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
4. No flames here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthside (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
5. "President Pelosi" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
6. Um, yah? Duh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
7. it's about the not only seeking real justice in the present -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
8. It's the Constitution .... stu.... nah. I won't say it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Maybe I'm missing something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. bwwwwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:31 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. You know what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:35 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. It looks as though others are trying. All you have to do is read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 07:14 PM Response to Reply #22 |
43. US Constitution, Article II, Section 4: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 08:26 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. That text does not obligate the house to impeach. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 07:52 PM Response to Reply #22 |
46. You would sacrifice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beaverhausen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 02:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
34. If there was ever a president who deserved to be impeached, it's this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
9. If Nancy makes it to the Oval Office...Honor and Dignity will finally make their presence known |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 01:34 PM Response to Reply #9 |
29. extend that cesspool not to only the Oval office but to our country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:20 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. BushCo has been COUNTER PRODUCTIVE TO THE POINT OF MAJOR L O S S |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
11. Impeachment does NOT lead to a "President Pelosi." That's a fictional straw man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I do believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:38 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. What if Cheney is impeached first and the VP nominated isn't approved and * is then impeached in the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 02:14 PM Response to Reply #20 |
33. We could quibble over who'd be the most likely VP to replace Cheney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 01:17 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. It wouldn't even make a decent plot in a novel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 01:10 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. Actually, your scenerio is a little unrealistic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 01:29 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Whether or not the Senate votes to remove does NOT preclude impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 01:53 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. Exactly right, TahitiNut! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 01:12 PM Response to Reply #11 |
24. So every other DA can indict in parallel EXCEPT the HoR? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 01:22 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. It's not a matter of "can" - it's a matter of "would". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mudesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:51 PM Response to Reply #27 |
37. Your first post kind of implied "can" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 08:23 PM Response to Reply #37 |
47. I don't know but I doubt it. I know of no case in history where more than one person was impeached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 07:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
45. But it's much more fun to ignore the facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 08:27 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. Indeed. I personally think it stinks of blind partisanship, quite frankly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
12. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Loge23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
14. Not about Pelosi, it's about justice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:28 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Absolutely! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
watercolors (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
21. She would make one damn good president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
25. Is this a trick question? HELL YES. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alkaline9 (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
30. You may have a point, but..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nunyabiz (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
36. I don't give a flying F%^& if Charlie Manson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goddess40 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
38. Purely because it's the right thing to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:55 PM Response to Original message |
39. I would have no problem with a President Pelosi. Nor much of one with "Speaker Hoyer" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redstone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
40. Yup. It's what I want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
41. If we have the votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
42. You bet we really want it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ISUGRADIA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
44. Ongoing support of Bush may be politically damaging for some Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
50. Yes. I support the constitution and my constitutional rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pat_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
51. We the People defined the succession. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:29 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC