Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ruling rejects NJ district's 24-hour conduct code

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 12:36 PM
Original message
Ruling rejects NJ district's 24-hour conduct code
The Ramapo Indian Hills Regional School District board overstepped its authority when it passed a round-the-clock code of conduct, the state Education Department has ruled.

The district's rule temporarily banned students from sports and extracurricular activities if they were accused of drinking alcohol, using drugs or breaking other laws, even if the alleged offense was committed off campus, after school and they were not convicted by a court.

However, acting state Education Commissioner Rochelle Hendricks recently upheld an administrative law judge's decision, declaring that the one-year-old policy was unconstitutional.

Hendricks pointed out that under state law, for a school board to punish a student for an off-campus offense, the discipline must be necessary to spare the student or others from harm, and the misconduct must have "some link to the school environment."

"It is too much of a stretch to find that all off-school-grounds conduct that may result in one of these violations would automatically make it necessary for the board to suspend or revoke a student's ability to participate in extracurricular activities in order to protect the well-being of the student, other students or the school staff," she wrote.

http://www.trentonian.com/articles/2010/09/20/news/doc4c964e3227245456703726.txt


More Pukes trying to control our every move. Glad they got shot down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Supreme Court will block this.
"Bong Hits for Jesus" case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The District's ruling or the judge's ruling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The judges ruling.
Scalia's decision in "Bong Hits for Jesus" allows schools to punish their students for stuff they do off campus and outside of school hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It simply limits students' free speech rights not conduct off hours
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. All right, all right, all right
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Just being ACCUSED would have been enough? JUST BEING ACCUSED?
Edited on Mon Sep-20-10 12:56 PM by rocktivity

rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC