Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lady Gaga , "If you don't like it, go home,"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 06:37 PM
Original message
Lady Gaga , "If you don't like it, go home,"
Lady Gaga rallies for 'don't ask, don't tell' repeal in Maine
http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/Music/09/20/gaga.gays.military/

Declaring that "Equality is the prime rib of America," pop star Lady Gaga urged Maine's two U.S. senators to help break a Republican filibuster on legislation that includes a repeal of the military's ban on openly homosexual service members.

"My name is Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta. I am an American citizen," the singer told a Portland, Maine, rally organized by the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network. She urged Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, both Republicans, to support the repeal of the Pentagon's "don't ask, don't tell" rule and share "the greatest cut of meat that my country has to offer" with gays and lesbians in the military.

"Shouldn't everyone deserve the right to wear the same meat dress that I do?" asked the singer, who caught flak for showing up at MTV's Video Music Awards in a dress made of raw meat. "Repeal 'don't ask, don't tell' or go home."

The 24-year-old singer also drew cheers by proposing a new law, titled, "If you don't like it, go home," which would remove homophobic straight soldiers from the military instead of gay soldiers.

"If you are not honorable enough to fight without prejudice, go home," she shouted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Say what you will about her
But while folks like Madonna always teased with LGBT sympathies, she gets right to the chase, no holds-barred. She might fulfill a lot of promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. You go girl! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bravo Lady GaGa
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. What she said is already reality
Once DADT is repealed.....

When it comes decision time to enlist or reenlist, you have that choice knowing it's an equal and open military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. This old lady loves me some Lady Gaga...
can you tell we have teens, lol?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
66 dmhlt Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
85. I'm deaf - but this old guy loves her, too!


All of Lady Gaga's escorts to the recent MTV Video Awards were victims of DADT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't like "love it or leave it" mentality from anyone...
I was really starting to like her... not her music (puke) but her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I have no problems with military discharges for outright bigotry
It disrupts unit cohesion, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. You can't force "correct thought"
Or "correct action"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Maybe not, but you can keep "incorrect thought" out of the military
Edited on Mon Sep-20-10 07:05 PM by derby378
Which is what our military should have been doing instead of letting the Gangster Disciples and Aryan Nations into their ranks because some pencil-pusher in the Pentagon had a "quota" to fill for the occupation of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I'll remember that next time I hear a TeaBagger say
Love it or leave it... I really don't think all y'all are getting what I am saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TK421 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I understand it, and find it annoying as well n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. The military is voluntary so apples and oranges n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. So is citizenship...
No one forces anyone else to live here. Apples and apples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Being born is here is not a choice - and that's 90%+ of those that live here
Edited on Mon Sep-20-10 08:59 PM by FreeState
Sorry it's apple and oranges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. No one is forcing anyone to remain a US citizen...
Do you not get that simple fact? You can be born here and become a citizen elsewhere. Happens all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Yes but the vast majority dont choose to be citizens the military 100% choose n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Becoming a citizen of another country is not so easy.
You have to have money, moving to another country can be very expensive, especially if you have a family.

The other country has to accept you as a citizen. You may be rejected. The language barrier can restrict options.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #31
79. So just reside there illegally...
Or are you saying that most countries don't bend over backwards to accomodate illegal immigrants?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #16
37. I hate that line of thought too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
46. You can't control thoughts, only actions.
The military doesn't allow people in with gang tattoos, and I personally know of a (now ex) Lt. in my unit who was kicked out for visiting a racist website on a government computer. I've also read about gangs in the military, but after many years in two different branches I've never met one. At least none that I'm aware of.

DADT isn't a military policy, it's forced upon them by Congress. Don't like it? Learn which tree to bark up. Don't diparage Obama or the military. Go after the Republicans who are threatening to block repeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #46
71. Obama can get in the fucking faces of Lincoln and Nelson
and lead on this with those Senate Dems who blocked this.

Don't tell me who I can and cannot disparage ever.

Fuck that.

My parents never had to wear their service on their sleeve to prove anything USArmyParatrooper.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #71
81. So now Obama is responsible for what Nelson and Lincoln do?
Edited on Tue Sep-21-10 03:44 PM by USArmyParatrooper
And you do know that even if there weren't a couple detractors - that if every single Democrat in the Senate voted for the bill it's still not enough to break the filibuster, right? How do you know Obama didn't get in their face?

So I'll say it again. Don't diparage Barack Obama for the bill being blocked. Disparage the Senators who blocked it

And now I'll address your childish little attack. Many DU posters reference their service in their screen name because they're proud of it. Personally I support that, but I chose mine to dispell the myth that being a Democrat means being anti-military. But do feel free to continue to personalize the discussion, 'cause damn it nobody is going to tell you what to do.

You have a wonderful day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #81
83. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
USArmyParatrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #83
95. So it's either 100% consensus from the Democrats or he's "not leading"?
The President can't make Nelson or Lincoln bend to his will. Sure he can generally build consensus, and with this bill we have that. But what you're asking for is for Obama to have total control, which is never going to happen. That whole 'separation of powers' thing.

AND.. as you conveniently ignored even with every single Democrat voting the same it's still not enough to break the filibuster. But no doubt you'd still find a way to blame Obama.

And since you threw in a veiled accusation that I'm "right wing" do you care to back it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #71
100. How utterly ridiculous. Since when do Senators answer to the President?
Especially Democratic Senators. Ever hear the term "herding cats"? They answer to their constituents, and Lincoln & Nelson represent very conservative constituencies. Your rage seems misplaced. Saying that Obama just needs to get in their faces is just plain clueless. Any Dem president would have faced the same resistance, which is why a Dem president wound up signing this crap bill in the first place. Remember that?

"Progressives" haven't come to terms with the fact that there are pockets of this country where a "true progressive" doesn't stand a chance, and that's where folks like Lincoln & Nelson come in. Pragmatists have long accepted the fact that this party accomodates everyone from Dennis Kucinich to Ben Nelson, and everything in between. Instead of focusing so much energy on blogs and internet websites, shouldn't "true progressives" be striving for a filibuster proof Congress? FWIW, posting angry crap on an internet site is not activism.

And ferchrissakes, please stop spreading the myth of 60 votes. We never had 60.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #46
75. Thought police piss me off more than just about anything...
That's all we have left that we can call our own... our thoughts. When you start screwing with people and trying to change their thoughts, you ultimately piss them off... think RW Fundies trying to force their beliefs down our throats.

I'm good with controlled action; people have to live with their own thoughts, I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I saw this news film as a kid of the National Guard
escorting kids to school, where racists did not want them to be. The racists had to deal or stand aside, did they not? And they were forced to do so. Were they not?
Laday GaGa is the Democrat of the year. MVP citizen GaGa. I thank her with great respect. And if you don't like it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Actually, you can force correct action
I frankly don't give a shit what people believe, but you can certainly make policy that determines how they act. And you damn well should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Absofuckinglutely!
Edited on Mon Sep-20-10 08:38 PM by JuniperLea
Methinks the point was missed. DADT is FUBAR and should never have been and should absofuckinglutely be repealed.

But the "Love it or leave it" meme is disgusting when the Republicans use it, and it stinks out loud when anyone else uses it too. Fucking reeks. If we embrace it now, there's now going back without being totally fucked up hypocrites.

All I'm saying is I really hate hearing anyone use the love it or leave it meme... it's not right... it's just not right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
66. But, ye of a faith that teaches precise word use, she did not
say what you keep typing at all. She did not say 'love it or leave it' she said bigots go home. In the context of the current mode, in which the bigots get to send good people home. Repeating over and over that you do not like what was not said is a sort of misinformation. GaGa spoke for herself, you rewrote it to fit your dislike of her, and of hearing clearly that anti gay bigots are bigots who should be unwelcome in society, not some 'faith folk' who should be gently handled.
If you can not work and play well with others, go home. That is not 'love it or leave it' it is deal with it or simply avoid it, because we will no longer stand for you sending us home to serve your bigoted and atavistic dogmas or ideas.
If you have to rewrite what someone else said in order to argue against it, that should be a sign that you are not correct. Your yes is to mean yes, and your no to mean no. When you bear witness, it must be painstakingly precise.
She did not say what you claim she said. And that tactic is so dishonest that it makes me nauseous. Homophobes are bigots, just like racists, and they have to learn to get over it, or they need to go home. Hating gays is not mitigated by faith or tradition.
They used armed troops to force integration of schools. They said, deal with it, or deal with us, or go home. Didn't they? They sure did. And they enforced behavior, which you said could not be done. Good lord.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. Cheese and Crackers, Got AllMuddy!
I already said I liked the Lady... and you brought the argument full circle... :eyes:

I never rewrote what she said... I explained... oh fuck it... why try? If you read this thread and you still don't get it, stick a fork in me...

bullshit... bullshit... bullshit

You and no one else can be the thought police... that's where people run into trouble. The world has slowly shifted and our youth today is far more accepting of homosexuals than they were 50 years ago. As with any issue, when you try to force thought, you will automatically lose.

When you can't read for comprehension, you end up with word salad in response... just saying... cheeses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
89. Didn't Harry Truman enforce correct thought when he integrated the Army in
1948? Or was it 1947?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #89
98. No, he enforced behavior not thought.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
54. Damned straight. In the military, they CAN restrict action and speech.
Edited on Tue Sep-21-10 09:16 AM by backscatter712
And bigotry should be treated with zero tolerance.

If you're in the military and say "I hate n****rs," then you should be prosecuted under the UCMJ, and be punished with demotion, loss of benefits, time in the stockade and dishonorable discharge. Same for anyone who says "I hate f****ts!"

Bigotry is a poison to America and a poison to our armed forces. Any expression of it in any shape or form should be punished severely. Preferably by dishonorable discharge and a long stay in Leavenworth.

Stop drumming out GLBT servicemembers and start drumming out bigots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I'll say it once again...
Edited on Mon Sep-20-10 06:54 PM by derby378
If I should find myself in the unfortunate position of having to use deadly force against those who are posing a direct threat to me as well as truth, justice, and the American way, and one of these marauders shoots me in the arm and the hip, and all of a sudden Lady Gaga is standing over me trying to stop the bleeding, I'll hand her my AK with my good hand and tell her, "The hell with me - cut down those bastards." And based on the passion that she just exhibited in that speech, I'd trust her to mow the lot of them down as much as a grizzled Marine corporal would.

And I wouldn't care that she wrote pop music or might have feelings for another woman. We're all Bozos in this bus.

She's got just as much right to enlist for active military service as all of us do. And soldiers should be professional enough that they can do their duty without saying "I ain't cooperating with that Allah-lover/queer/insert-epithet-here in my unit."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Methinks the point was missed by a mile...
Sheesh... shoot me now.... fuck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #18
47. This approach is last resort, but it often works:


throw their own crap back at them.

Often, "walking a mile in someone else's shoes" involves having bigots hear the same words directed at them as they have hurled at others.

"Love it or leave it" in this case is being used as a device, not as a demand to "leave the country," but as a suggestion to "leave the military" if you are a bigot.

In this instance, I understand her use of this tactic.

I think it's brilliant.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Balderdash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
70. Your point wasn't missed
you were wrong in how you read what Lady Gaga said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. She didn't say love it or leave. She said if you're the one discriminating then you need to go home
She didn't say love it or leave.
She said if you're the one that doing the discriminating then you need to go home
and NOT the gay soldier that wants to serve his/her country.

Did you watch the whole video?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Do you not get that this is the same thing?
Love it or leave it... if you don't like it go home... same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. No, it is not the same thing. Listen to the whole speech carefully.
Edited on Mon Sep-20-10 09:09 PM by Tx4obama

"If you are not honorable enough to fight without prejudice, go home," she shouted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #29
64. Exactly - there is no Constitutional right to be part of the Armed Forces
You have the same chance as everyone else - to sign up, report for basic training, get shouted at by the drill instructor, negotiate a grueling obstacle course, field-strip your duty rifle, endure the gas shack, and whomp your fellow recruits silly with a padded stick. But not everyone has the physical and psychological endurance needed to hack it through basic. Some people wash out, sometimes through no fault of their own. But the military is looking for the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
67. If they were the same thing, you'd not have done the rewrite
for rhetorical effect. You could not build an argument against what she actually said, so you pulled an inference out and stated that she said what you claim to have 'heard' implied. Others here did not 'hear' her say 'love it or leave it' at all.
If they meant the same thing, you'd not have pulled the rhetorical rewrite, but you did. With intention. That is a visible thing. It is one hell of a long walk to make a 'point'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
77. That's what HST said when he integrated the military. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. I can take or leave her music, but I admire her a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yup, that'll really do the trick there
Edited on Mon Sep-20-10 07:28 PM by Gman
those meat dresses are so persuasive. She could have done a lot more good by keeping her mouth shut. But she can't stand it if she's not the center of attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yeah, shut up and sing, right?
Do you apply that standard to other professions? That they should not advocate the Congress to pursue policy they happen to support? Should electricians not speak out? Should programmers remain silent? What's the list?
I think Americans speaking out and using what they have to use to help make change is what we should encourage, everybody should do what GaGa does.
And if you listen to the crowds there who are also advocating the same position, you can hear that they welcome her courage, humor, and yes indeed, the attention she can draw. You should let them know you don't agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #15
39. No, I only apply the standard to people that wear dresses made of meat
and want to be taken seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #39
69. In a money based society, she is rich, has a huge audience
and is taken multi-million seriously. She's a performer. I see you in other threads asking people what they have done to influence the Senate and I see GaGa part of an event that does just that, but oh, for her, she should do nothing. Because of what she does for a living. For which she makes huge, giant, piles of money. She's not running for office.
The crowd there, the people who also support what she does, loved what she said. She motivates lots of people, and shows them by example that they should be calling the Senate, marching, and speaking out. She does not just tell her fans to 'do stuff' she shows them how it is done. She sets a fine example as an American citizen.
I know a plumber. 'Waste disposal'. Yet he is a fine and serious man. Works with shit for money. Is that a problem for you, that people have jobs and wear costumes or otherwise behave in ways that they do not do in their off time? The plumber, he never does plumbing for fun, just for money. We all have a job. GaGa made herself a good business, the American way.
I dig that you don't like her, but taking issue with any American being a activist on our side is just daft and a half, and not necessary to your critique of her art.
She is a huge star kid, your derision matter not to her or to hers. Have you heard of Media Matters? That site is run by a former super model named Ann Simonton I believe who got much press for the media's views of women by entering a beauty contest in a dress made of meat, as Miss Steak. She was arrested and all. It was big news. GaGa knows the background and messages of meat dresses of history, and there have been meat dresses of history. The image of humans as commodities tends to strike a chord or two. As it did with you, clearly.
What are your markers for being 'taken seriously'? Power, money? Talent? Audience? How can one tell if one is taken seriously? What if one does not wish to be taken as serious, but would prefer to be sincere? Not the same thing.
When you are an artist, being taken 'seriously' means being a rotting academic. Would you say Dali sought to be 'taken seriously' or what? Did the mustache, the photos with meat, hurt him? Would he be more without those photos, or the wacky, anti serious image? Was Picasso too colorful?
Your posts are just so funny to me. "why don't you pressure the Senate, unless you are an artist I don't care for, then you should shut up."
Artists are just people with jobs. Citizens. Deal with it. Citizen activism is a good thing, always, especially when it is liberal activism that directly supports current administration policy as stated. I love it when people speak out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #69
78. So much energy you expend for someone that dresses up in raw sliced brisket
and wants to be taken seriously in a Senator's office. SOrry, the real world doesn't work like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #78
102. She's a pop artist who works in various media
and one medium she works with is shocking fashion. It's just one medium out of many. (Music, dance, and video are other media she plays with.)

The idea that using shocking fashion as an aspect of performance automatically renders you an idiot...was pretty much blown out of the water by the pop art movement and radical designers of the 60s--if not much, much earlier by performers and designers of the 20s and 30s.

It's a meat dress. It was amusing. It was worn once. It was meant for photos and giggles. I think YOU'RE the one taking that single item of clothing so seriously that it overshadows the person who wore it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #102
103. When you're trying to pass legislation and you really need a couple of votes
Edited on Wed Sep-22-10 08:33 PM by Gman
the idea of using shocking fashion like dressing in a raw meat dress makes you look like a first class idiot. How do you think Snowe and Collins would seriously explain their changing and voting for cloture after being lobbied by someone that wears a meat dress?

This is not art. This is drop dead serious politics. Some people don't get it. And I mean drop dead serious. These are life and death decisions that are being made. Repealing DADT is very much life or death legislation. People's very lives could depend on how this vote went. So she dresses in meat and expects to be taken seriously and people defend her. THis is insane. Actually, it's there's a huge amount of immaturity involved with people defending her. They just don't get it. You know, she very likely could have screwed it up herself. What if Collins and Snowe were going to vote for cloture? Maybe the heat would be just too much to look like they caved to Gaga.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Disagree with you entirerly
She is very powerful celebrity - if you don't get her art that's fine - but atleast she's actually doing something - I don't see any other pop artist even attempting to stand up and fight anti-gay bigotry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #20
59. She is powerful within her market
in the rest of the real world you don't wear a dress made of meat and expect to be taken seriously. You can expect to be thought of as an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #59
92. Well, the "real" world may have just guffawed. Even Bob Hope got guffaws...
and could step into a Senator's office, if he just had to. Consider seriously: Perhaps Ga Ga has some sway with our troops in "their market," and this may be good at legitimizing (some call it peer pressure) glbt presence in the military -- esp. in the combat zones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
84. shut up and sing, like Natalie Maines was told by the bigot country music people that didn't like
her commenting about the war being wrong, right????

Natalie was threatened by people for speaking up. I'm sure Gaga will be, too. regardless if you think "meat dress" is totally goofy, she's a unique oddball musician with heart, and she's putting a multi-multi-multi-million dollar career on the line for civil rights - so we should back her and at the most just say, I don't agree with some of her choices but she's standing up for equality.....

:#K$JI#II#(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
91. I can't speak for the meat dress, but if you got something to say, say it...
Frankly, we don't have enough people on "our side" willing to open their respective mouths. And if m'lady Ga Ga can pull it off, using her celebrity "power," that's fine with me.

I once saw in 1980 Randy "Biscuit" Turner, lead singer for the Big Boys (Austin punk band) take the station dressed in pre-cut bologna. All over. Still don't know his message. Do you know Ga Ga's?

BTW, most everyone who's "on stage" wants to be the center of attention, so what's the point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
23. What did "meat dress" have to do with any of it. I wish she picked her battles better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. Yeah, that's kind of off-putting
She had a perfectly good message without that kind of weirdness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #23
38. Why did she "catch flak" for appearing in a meat dress?
Did someone in the world expect her to NOT show up in a meat dress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
28. "If you are not honorable enough to fight without prejudice, go home," she shouted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joe_sixpack Donating Member (655 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
32. I find it hard to get too excited
She's another product of a corporation which is squeezing as much money out of her as possible. Every 7.5 days they schedule a bit of news to keep her face time high and her sales up. I dont' see what power she has to really affect serious issues. Because she wasn't deemed sufficiently "attractive" enough for a pop star, it was calculated that she would have to rely more on an "outrageous" personality. It was a pretty profitable and lucrative idea that managed to attract our attention span for a sufficient length of time to make some decent money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. she's using her fame for a good cause. i like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joe_sixpack Donating Member (655 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Every pop artist has to have a cause to stay valid these days
It wouldn't be profitable to use her fame for a bad cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #32
40. She's doing something.
"Lead, follow or get the hell out of the way" is a saying we have for a reason.

There is nothing about her which suggests her feelings about gay issues are anything but sincere.

She's 24. Do you remember what being 24 was like? It means not being so cynical. It means retaining some idealism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #40
49. But why is she doing it? Fame? Record Sales? Promotion?
Or does she actually give a shit?

Everything she has ever done has been about marketing her as a pop singer.

I hope I'm wrong, but the history has so far proven me right; and I love her music.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #49
53. She's doing it because it's a cause she believes in.
Edited on Tue Sep-21-10 09:14 AM by TexasObserver
Why would she champion a cause she doesn't believe in?

I find your cynicism to be baseless. She's a pop star who is using her celebrity to advance a good cause.

Did you even bother to watch her ten minute speech in Maine, as shown in the OP?

When DADT is shot down, she will have had a role in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joe_sixpack Donating Member (655 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #53
96. "When DADT is shot down, she will have had a role in it."
That's a bit of a stretch, don't you think? I believe she has a right to say whatever she wants. If this is what she feels strongly about, then right on. My personal feelings are that I don't tend to assign too much importance to pop stars, especially one who was totally manufactured by media companies. Some musicians may rise to a level where they can actually cause some impact, such as Bono or Springsteen, Dylan, but she's a long way from that level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #96
97. Yes, that's correct. She's doing more about it than anyone else.
That's not in dispute.

In your order of priorities, taking to task the most prominent voice against DADT is apparently very high. Your affection for aging rockers notwithstanding, Bono and Bob Dylan haven't done a damn thing about it, have they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joe_sixpack Donating Member (655 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #97
99. I wouldn't call her the most prominent...
Edited on Tue Sep-21-10 08:52 PM by joe_sixpack
unless you mean of a certain generation or appealing to a younger age group. I would say Joint Chiefs Chairman Mullen might be considered the most prominent voice who has spoken out against DADT.
And you've got me. I agree that Bono or Dylan haven't done anything about it to this point. And, in spite of my examples, I actually like some musicians other than aging rockers. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #99
101. Well, she is the most prominent voice pushing for repeal of DADT.
Perhaps if you would view her as a voice for change instead of merely writing her off because you don't like her, you'd see that.

Your view on this topic seems terribly uninformed. Try reading about her and her efforts a little more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #49
55. She's been a huge supporter of the GLBT community for years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Gaga

Early in her career she had difficulty getting radio airplay, and stated, "The turning point for me was the gay community. I've got so many gay fans and they're so loyal to me and they really lifted me up. They'll always stand by me and I'll always stand by them. It's not an easy thing to create a fanbase." She thanked FlyLife, a Manhattan-based LGBT marketing company with whom her label Interscope works, in the liner notes of her debut studio album, The Fame, saying, "I love you so much. You were the first heartbeat in this project, and your support and brilliance means the world to me. I will always fight for the gay community hand in hand with this incredible team." One of her first televised performances was in May 2008 at the NewNowNext Awards, an awards show aired by the LGBT television network Logo, where she sang her song "Just Dance". In June of the same year, she performed the song again at the San Francisco Pride event. After The Fame was released, she revealed that the song "Poker Face" was about her bisexuality. In an interview with Rolling Stone, she spoke about how her boyfriends tended to react to her bisexuality, saying "The fact that I’m into women, they’re all intimidated by it. It makes them uncomfortable. They’re like, 'I don’t need to have a threesome. I’m happy with just you'." When she appeared as a guest on The Ellen DeGeneres Show in May 2009, she praised DeGeneres for being "an inspiration for women and for the gay community". She proclaimed that the October 11, 2009, National Equality March rally on the national mall was "the single most important event of her career." As she exited, she left with an exultant "Bless God and bless the gays," similar to her 2009 MTV Video Music Awards acceptance speech for Best New Artist a month earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #32
48. She's most marketed entertainer ever; and that's impressive considering all that came before her.
I'm glad that she's bringing attention to this cause, but I question how much of it is more than just marketing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #48
80. You must not have been around for Elvis, the Beatles, Madonna or Michael Jackson.
Of all the things to get mad about, you choose the one entertainer who is clearly doing the most to end some of the worst discrimination in modern society.

How odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #48
86. Because a performer is marketed practically to death does not
mean s/he has no allegiance to a specific cause and in fact I doubt there is any correlation at all. Is there any evidence this is just a promotional stunt? If so, please share it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #48
87. You don't know. She worked to market HERSELF, having labored years in the wilderness.
Edited on Tue Sep-21-10 04:54 PM by WinkyDink
She is brilliant, avant-garde, creative, thought-provoking, and plain old talented.

She also can now command the attention of a great many people, and I for one am pleased that she has chosen to do so for a good cause.

How many opera singers or scientists or CEO's are speaking to this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #48
93. If I'm drowning in a river, and am rescued by a rowboat full of bologna...
piloted by a marketing wizz, I'll get on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
34. That's what I call fierce.
:thumbsup: She's quirky, but she knows how to draw media attention and is getting a lot of coverage. It's a solid message and she didn't have to take the time to do this and she did. That makes her a stellar person in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
41. I posted video of her addressing the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
42. I find it disgusting that posters are bashing a good Progressive because she is a pop celeb.
Snobbery is not Progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. Agreed.
Attacking her for addressing a subject such as this is juvenile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #42
50. I wasn't keen on her music but I am respecting what she is doing
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #42
51. It's not about her celebrity; it's about her motivations.
As I've said earlier, it's all about promotion for her as a pop singer; not for her cause.

She's nothing more than a product for a corporation, or at least that's what she's always been in the past.

And, I actually love her music.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #51
60. Then she sure is going through an awful lot of trouble.
So does this appply to any and all artists? They are essentially self promoting if they speak out on an issue and really don't mean it? Check out the video I posted in political videos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zing Zing Zingbah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #51
90. I don't think she needs the cause to promote herself as an artist
She already gets plenty of coverage in the media for her music and her fashion choices. She's sold tons of albums and has won many awards. I think I've heard she the most fans of anyone on twitter or facebook or both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #51
94. I work to save all kinds of wildlife. Motivation? I hunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #42
52. That's not why they are bashing her. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BakedAtAMileHigh Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #42
68. yeah, how dare they critique pop culture!
We should all listen to and respect the opinions of pop musicians, actors and pundits!

Don't tell me what is and what isn't "progressive", please. You don't create the definition.

You do realize that people can think pop culture is a death trap and celebrity society is a sucking black hole of idiocy and still agree that DOMA needs to go, right? You do realize that people can despise Lady Gaga as a simpleton who uses controversy to sell her mediocre music while still fighting for equal rights for all humanity, don't you?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #42
104. Are they?
Or are they bashing a pop celeb because she is a good Progressive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
44. K&R
Yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VMI Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
45. Wow. A real fierce advocate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
56. Wonderful! KNR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
57. LOVE me some Lady GaGa!! and now here is some very cool GaGa and soldiers dancing to her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Change Happens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
58. Cool...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuckessee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
61. If this is the best spokesperson they have then they're sunk.
If they can't do any better than having a manufactured freak tout their cause then I consider the cause useless & lost.

Lady Gaga, you've made enough money to be set for life. Since you're so concerned about the military what's keeping you from signing up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #61
74. Who are you calling "they"
Who?

GLBT who have waited more than long enough for equal rights under the law???? Are you in your representatives faces about this? What are YOU doing for equal rights under the law?????

"They"

Who are you????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #61
88. Your rant is bizarre. Citizens are not allowed to speak of the military? They must "sign...up"?
She is decidedly not "manufactured", which you would know if you had a clue about her.

And I'll ask, also: Who are "THEY"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeremyfive Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
62. Newfound Repect for the Lady Gaga! Go Gaga!
I feel so much love for Lady Gaga this week. Keep up the pressure, My Lady! This is one of the darkest times for America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
63. K and R (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
65. Her music is annoying
but I love her ideals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #65
76. I can't stand her music...
But love her fashion sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
73. Geaux Gaga!!
:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
82. I just love this lady. She is awesome
Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC