Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Else Was in That "DADT" Bill? A Lot.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 11:05 PM
Original message
What Else Was in That "DADT" Bill? A Lot.
When Republicans successfully mustered their entire caucus to block an up-or-down vote on "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" on Tuesday, they were blocking a heck of a lot more. (...) As the party of "Hell no!" tries to convince voters that it has an affirmative vision for America, here's a look at just a few of the other rules Republicans didn't want to become the law of the land—from combating contractor corruption and reducing Uncle Sam's foreign footprint, to going green and caring for wounded warriors:

Revamping US Military and Foreign Policy ...

Anti-Corruption ...

Environmental Progress ...

Service Member Welfare ...

Disaster Response ...


Except Republicans did get plenty of say on this bill. That's how we got amendments like these:

* Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

~snip~


There's also this:

* Sense of Congress regarding recreational hunting and fishing on military installations.
And my favorite:

* Sense of Congress encouraging the President to order the United States flag to be flown over United States military and civilian outposts in Haiti during earthquake relief efforts.


Because what displaced Haitians really need right now is to see Old Glory flapping in the breeze from, you know, somebody else's enclosed shelter.

In the end, even these concessions weren't enough for Republicans to allow a majority vote on the overall bill. Why? ... it all comes back to one 573-word provision tucked into this 190,655-word bill. That provision, comprising three-tenths of 1 percent of the National Defense Authorization Act, is Section 536: "Department of Defense policy concerning homosexuality in the Armed Forces."

We have this to be thankful for, at least: Conservatives have made it clear where their legislative priorities lie.
http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/09/what-else-in-dadt-bill-repeal-senate-defense-act-lgbt



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-10 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes... thank you... can we keep the blame for what happened today where it belongs?
on conservatives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yup. Just as a reminder: every Republican voted against it
and nearly every Democrat voted to repeal DADT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC