|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Jack Sprat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:15 PM Original message |
110th Congress is lame. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. Wow. You missed out on some good stuff they did. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Sprat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Yes, they passed minimum wage legislation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Telly Savalas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 07:42 PM Response to Reply #8 |
18. Did I miss it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 11:48 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Nope. No minimum wage increase yet. After all, they got the publicity. Screw the workers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberaldemocrat7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:03 PM Response to Reply #22 |
32. You're asking the wrong people for progressive legislation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 08:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. The powers of Congress are limited on foreign policy. Sad, but true. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
2. would you prefer a Congress that does that AND tries to push anti-gay marriage amendments? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Sprat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:58 AM Response to Reply #2 |
23. Ah yes, the "we suck less" argument. Anything to maintain the illusion of choice. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 01:25 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. You honestly can't see any difference between this Congress and the one of the last few years? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 02:37 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. I never said there was no difference, only that they are largely cosmetic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 05:09 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. That's right, I forgot. We elected them to a very slim majority so they could wave their magic wands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 07:01 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Over 60 years we have seen overwhelming majorities, total reverses, split houses, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #25 |
35. Yes, there is a tiny difference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redstone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
3. Not sure about the rest of your post, but I'll agree with this statement that you made: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:55 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. Good point, Redstone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rsmith6621 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
4. B I N G O |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
5. What are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Sprat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Here is what I'm talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:01 AM Response to Reply #13 |
30. That's him, not them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 07:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Hearings and investigations are what many brought in by this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
6. While I agree that we get to chose among millionaires |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
7. Well, I'll just vote republican next time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullimiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
9. not as lame as the 109th or 8th and at least part of the 7th.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. That is true. Maybe the Dems are waiting for a 2008 victory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Sprat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 05:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. sure, I will agree with that. (shrug) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
15. Their approval rating confirms that fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
16. They are failing- they wanted control and with that came deep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
20. Teeny tiny slim DEM majority hasn't fixed what the GOP took decades to fuck up yet... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otherlander (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-18-07 11:43 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. No, in a Burger King |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 01:04 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Excuse me but you should look back at just who controlled congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faux pas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 03:59 AM Response to Original message |
26. I'm with you. I believe the hearings are just a smoke screen to have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 04:55 AM Response to Original message |
27. So I Guess You Miss The 109th Congress??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HowHasItComeToThis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 10:21 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. the goops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
koopie57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 07:34 AM Response to Original message |
28. Yikes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larry Ogg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
31. To all those who approve of the job performance of the democratically controlled 110th congress, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-19-07 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
33. They Laugh At The Oldest GOP Joke In DC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-20-07 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
38. I feel dirty for even mentioning his name, but concealed by all of the insane babble |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC