Names taken out to protect the innocent (and guilty)
RIGHT WING FACE BOOK FRIEND:
This is lunacy!
American Thinker Blog: Obama: 'We can absorb a terrorist attack'
www.americanthinker.com
MY DEM FRIEND:
I KNOW! No context AND ellipses within the quote! (LIKED BY ME!)
INSULTED ORIGINAL POSTER:
So you don't see what was said as being outrageous? A sitting President almost inviting another attack? Ellipses notwithstanding, this could be exactly how it's written in the book. Just the first sentence alone is enough to raise eyebrows and red flags. But, if you don't think so, then punctuate away.
ORIGINAL POSTER GETTING EVER MORE FURIOUS:
You know what? Never mind. I'm just a stupid Tea Party philosophy person who doesn't think the current President walks on water or is the messiah. Sorry for not knowin' nuthin'.
ME:
Actually that "absorb" language was originally in published Bush White House documents that are still archived on the WH site, so the outrage is somewhat tardy and misdirected: ,
http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dc/2010/09/bush-beat-obama-to-the-punch-o.htmlAnd no I don't see what was said as "outrageous" whether it was said by Bush or Obama.
American THINKER? Judging by that article this publication should consider changing its name. Fail.
CURRENTLY: CRICKETS!!!
:rofl:
THANKS DU!! OF COURSE, I SAW THE ARTICLE I POSTED RIGHT HERE!