Yesterday, I spent the drive home from work having a meltdown over the subject of human overpopulation.
When I got home, it just happened that there was a thread here at DU on the subject of social pressure to have (birth your own) children.
Sure, every day, I see the continuing sprawl. I see traffic snarls in villages that, 10 or even 5 years ago, were easy to navigate. It's become rather automatic for me to suppress that awareness; it's our innate survival mechanism whereby we censor our own thoughts because the reality is too overwhelming.
It's monarch butterfly migration time now, and there are far fewer than I remember 5 years ago... I was on the highway and saw several Monarchs struggling to flutter south--barely making it across, struggling against the wind impact from speeding vehicles. I was plunged into such deep sorrow.
This time of year, there used to be hundreds of wooly bear caterpillars around too, out here in the country... I haven't seen
any this year yet, and saw almost none last year.
Honey bees... I saw less than I could count on two hands this summer.
But I've seen plenty of Babies Я Us stores.
****
The time for protestations that bearing as many children as you want is a "god" given right is OVER.
By our SELFISH attachment to our romanticized notions and biological urges, we ARE killing all other species who are unable to adapt to living in the polluted shadow of our human activities.
"Selfish" is NOT declining to reproduce your gene complement; it is demanding that every other living being on the planet take a back seat to your need for more, more more babies.
Yes, my opinion pisses off many people, but I don't care anymore. Admitting responsibility for the reality of our continued expansion and its effects on the planet is more important than anyone's protest that they don't like hearing about it. I've been called sick, twisted, ignorant and all other manner of unpleasantries for speaking bluntly about the subject. Pretty good indication that the issue needs to be taken out of the closet.
Perhaps some of us here know of the famous experiments by J.B. Calhoun investigating the effects of overpopulation in rat colonies:
http://www.nytimes.com/1995/09/29/obituaries/j-b-calhoun-78-researcher-on-effects-of-overpopulation.htmlIn a 40-year career, mostly at the National Institute of Mental Health, Dr. Calhoun demonstrated that as population density increased, social behavior degenerated.
Among other findings, he developed the concept of universal autism -- in which all members of the last generation of mice in an increasingly crowded environment are incapable of the social behavior that would allow them to produce the next generation. And he described a phenomenon in which some mice become "beautiful ones," maintaining their physical appearance, but doing little else, as the population swells.
In one of Dr. Calhoun's experiments, a square steel box, nine feet on each side, contained 2,600 mice, about 16 times what would be considered normal density. He determined that rodents rapidly developed a hierarchy when thrown together in such huge numbers, with those closest to the food supply growing most rapidly and, because of their size, assuming higher social status.
Here's a highly informational article, from the UK Guardian:
Humans driving extinction faster than species can evolve, say experts
Conservationists say rate of new species slower than diversity loss caused by the destruction of habitats and climate change
For the first time since the dinosaurs disappeared, humans are driving animals and plants to extinction faster than new species can evolve, one of the world's experts on biodiversity has warned.
Conservation experts have already signalled that the world is in the grip of the "sixth great extinction" of species, driven by the destruction of natural habitats, hunting, the spread of alien predators and disease, and climate change.
more:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/mar/07/extin... *******
snip from:
http://www.continuum-hypothesis.com/population.html :
In high school biology class we grew a bacteria colony on a Petri dish. I smeared the agar and put the dish in an incubator. After a couple of days there were some colored dots - bacteria multiplying and consuming the nutrients. I forgot about it for a few days, and when I opened the incubator again the dish was covered with a thick gray scum - the bacteria had consumed all the agar and died.
There are plenty of individual human geniuses - Newton, Gauss, Shakespeare, Beethoven, Einstein - but as a species we're like the bacteria on the Petri dish, controlled by our individual drives to survive and reproduce. In a way, we're more foolish than bacteria: we use our intelligence to try to pack a few more of our kind into our Petri dish, thinking we can outsmart nature. This foolishness may destroy us.
The central problem facing Earth is human overpopulation. This creates a chain reaction of consequences that are ruining Earth, are disrupting the natural processes that produced life, are causing massive extinction of non-human life, and in the worst case could lead to the extinction of human life. Social problems - injustice, economic inequality, genocide, cultural extinction, etc. - exist and should be addressed. But they're insignificant compared to overpopulation. The overpopulation problem will eventually solve itself, as it did in the Petri dish. Is a better outcome possible? Considering human nature, probably not. But we have to try anyway.
If this little post encourages ONE person to consider limiting family size, to adopt if they want a large family, I will have accomplished something worthwhile.I realize this subject is wildly unpopular and that I WILL get flamed. I may even get tombstoned for making people mad. If so, so be it. I intend to not bother replying to those who would flame me with ridiculous accusations that I am sick, a psycho, or that my position would extinguish the human race.