Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This May Be What Passes For The Voice Of Sanity in Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 06:45 AM
Original message
This May Be What Passes For The Voice Of Sanity in Afghanistan
Edited on Sat Sep-25-10 07:02 AM by unhappycamper
US strategists seek Afghan fixes outside the box
By KIMBERLY DOZIER, Associated Press Writer Kimberly Dozier, Associated Press Writer – 1 hr 59 mins ago

KABUL, Afghanistan – On a NATO base in Kabul, a five-member team is rethinking the war in Afghanistan and questioning some of the basic assumptions behind the effort to clean up corruption and gain the upper hand over the Taliban.

~snip~

Throughout, the U.S. has the power only to encourage, not to coerce, a change in behavior or in Afghan leadership, if a given official simply won't change their ways, the team explains.

And in some cases, the Americans may have to look the other way, as the Afghan people do, the Red Team recommends. Afghans often tolerate local leaders enriching themselves to some extent, as long as they're seen to be sharing that wealth, Dietz explains.

As for long term changes, the Red Team recommends patience. Dietz compares the current Afghan system to the evolving political system of the U.S. in the early 1900s.

"We've talked about can you go from a feudal-like system ... to a participatory democracy, without all of the intervening steps — monarchy, industrialization," says Dietz. "You can't do that overnight. We can't make it happen just because we want it to happen.




unhappycamper comment: I am not willing to stay in Afghanistan for the next xx years, where xx = more years.

I am not willing to nation build in Afghanistan.

I am not willing to pay a million dollars per American soldier per year in Afghanistan.

I am not willing to bribe warlords in Afghanistan.

I am not willing to trash the United States economy in Afghanistan.

I am not willing to spend $400 dollars for a gallon of gasoline in Afghanistan.

I am not willing to drone people in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

I am not willing to support corporation's wars with American military muscle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree 100% with all your statements
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-25-10 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. "can you go from a feudal-like system ... to a participatory democracy,"
While here, we seem to be doing the opposite.
Quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC