Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Notes to a painter.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 11:35 AM
Original message
Notes to a painter.
Edited on Mon Sep-27-10 11:41 AM by TalkingDog


http://www.mcnaughtonart.com/artwork/view_zoom/?artpiece_id=379


McNaughton responses to Criticisms of The Forgotten Man

I would like to take a minute to explain some of the points of confusion for those who wish to interpret my picture.

1. Why did I paint this? Like many Americans I feel shock at the direction our country is heading. There is a great polarizing effect taking place in America today. There are many who swoon over Obama's policies of redistribution of wealth. What will the government give me? If you believe this is the proper role of government you will certainly see great CHANGE in your lifetime. I wanted to paint a picture that portrays the plight of the common man. Perhaps the FM is already experiencing this now or will in the future. My hope is that he will "wake up!" now before it is too late.
2. There is no racial meaning or undertone that the FM is not black. This is not a racial painting; it is about the vanishing of the American dream.
3. It is not a partisan painting. I take no favoritism of Republicans or Democrats. Both parties are guilty.
4. The only solution I offer is to take a 180 degree turn and return to the principles of the Constitution, which define a limited government, protect individual and states' rights and make no allowance for any of the baggage we have accumulated over the years in the form of entitlement programs. The only way to cure the cancer is to root it out and endure the painful healing. Perhaps, with God's help, we will survive.
5. Is it disrespectful to have in my painting the President of the United States standing on the Constitution? Is the President without reproach? I am simply one American speaking to another American. The painting symbolically suggests the actions of Barack Obama as well as other presidents. Yes, their actions speak louder than words—as do the brushstrokes in my painting.
6. I have endeavored to keep this information simple and to the point. The information is historical, if it is not familiar to you—Google it.
7. I picked the trashed papers based on the issues that I believe have been the most damaging to America. These issues have been trampled by politicians of both parties for over a century. When will the American people decide to defend the Forgotten Man? Let us raise our voices together and demand the kind of CHANGE that will truly save our way of life.
8. Why did I not mention critical information about some Presidents which defined their presidencies? My only purpose is to identify each President and with simplicity express what they have done to either help or hinder the Forgotten Man. I invite all to search deeper into the history of the painting's message and discover if what I paint is true. Can you truly say our house is in order when our debt is stealing away the future of every man woman and child in America?


My critique:


Hi Jon,

Your paintings are fairly well executed. Although they suffer somewhat from a weakness in your understanding of how to use color. You may want to consider limiting your palette. But in viewing your work, the more problematic weakness is your conception of the utilization of visual language.

I just finished reading your defense of "The Forgotten Man.".

If what you are saying in that explanatory text is what you really believe you have put across visually, then you really need to stick to your path as a devotee of Bob Ross and Thomas Kincaid.

The religious paintings are probably as far as you'll want to go in developing a body of narrative work. Everybody already knows those stories, so the narrative doesn't require you to think too critically about how to express it.

Stick to simple subjects with forthright, easy narratives and you'll be fine.

Obviously, you got in over your head on this one. But, take that as a good sign. It's always a good thing to try to stretch beyond your limitations. There is no shame in failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Please tell me you sent that.
I have to say that as kitsch, his stuff is freaking awesome. It always cheers me up when he has a new one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh yeah, sent it right before I posted. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Right on! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Of course! The Republican party is well known for it's kneejerk defense of the downtrodden
Edited on Mon Sep-27-10 11:40 AM by librechik
and the Liberals NATURALLY have contempt for the Constitution. Right.

Forget about the ACLU and Social Security and Medicare and the fight --against conservatives--over civil rights. Liberals are thoughtless traitors to American citizens in trouble. Right?

Fuck you McNaughton. Your tripe is Shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. He should probably stick with gnomes in a snowy cottage or
'Dogs playing poker'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Pff. Amateur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. That. Is AWESOME! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Dr. House looks totally bummed
that he didn't get to ride the unicorn first!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyeofdelphi Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. LOL
that's what i was thinking. what the hell does Hugh Laurie have to do with american politics? though doesn't he always kinda look like that on House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madamesilverspurs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. Every time I see this thing
it seems to be saying "but what about the poor white guy?!" And what's with the man behind Obama, looks like he's waiting for someone to hike the ball.

Bleccchh.


-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. And you've made my point exactly.
He claims he was trying to say...yada yada yada. And what you are "reading" in the visual narrative says something completely different.

So, he's either lying or he doesn't understand his craft.

I'm willing to bet the first choice is the correct one.

I've taught college students, I know bullshit justifications when I hear them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Gee it's a toss up for crappiest conservative artist, Thomas Kinkade or McNaughton
Edited on Mon Sep-27-10 12:07 PM by Stevenmarc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. He's not standing on the Constitution. He's covering the shit stain where W wiped his ass with it.
That's my interpretation, anyway.

Oh, and W seems to be looking at JFK like "What're YOU doin' here? Ah thought mah daddy got rid of you."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. Dick.
If it's not a partisan painting, then why the fuck do you have a DEMOCRATIC president (a Constitutional Law SCHOLAR and LECTURER, as you dumbshits often seem to forget or just flat out don't KNOW about) standing on your precious Constitution and every other President behind Obama looking at him like he's a dumbass?

Another reason I know that this painting is bu-bu-BULLShit is Reagan and the Failure Fratster are actually showing concern for bench guy's plight. Those two aid-n-abettor criminals did more to put that guy in the shit situation he's in than all others in that photo combined.

"I invite all to search deeper into the history of the painting's message and discover if what I paint is true." Maybe this fuck should follow his own advice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-27-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. "The painting symbolically suggests the actions of Barack Obama as well as other presidents."
Edited on Mon Sep-27-10 04:34 PM by Adsos Letter
The painting symbolically suggests the actions of Barack Obama as well as other presidents.

Oh yeah, including those "other" presidents, that's the message you're trying to convey. :sarcasm:

Liar, as well as slop artist.

EDIT: replaced "Idiot" with "Liar," seemed more appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC