WillyT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-27-10 07:17 PM
Original message |
| Does Anybody Know What Olberman Was Talking About Regarding The Senate And The Lame Duck Session ??? |
|
He seemed to be suggesting that the three appointed Senators would not be able to vote in the lame duck session after the election.
Do they lose their seats/right to vote as soon as somebody is elected to their seat in November?
Do the new Senators come in and take their seats immediately instead of waiting to be sworn in 2011?
Did I hear this whole thing wrong?
Anybody else catch that, and if so... please esplain, Lucy !
:shrug:
|
| dsc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-27-10 07:20 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. I am pretty sure that is the case |
|
only it is five, not three. We have appointees in WV, CO, IL, NY, and DE. We are currently very far ahead in two, ahead in one, a little behind in one, and pretty far behind in one.
|
| HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-27-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. It's been posted here repeatedly |
| WillyT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-27-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. Well Hell, Hugh... I Must Of Missed It... |
|
Can ya spare a link?
This is the first I've heard of it.
:shrug:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:50 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
