Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's new tune on DADT repeal: "Keep the LONG VIEW in mind".

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 02:01 PM
Original message
Obama's new tune on DADT repeal: "Keep the LONG VIEW in mind".
FAIL.

===

via Americablog: In an interview with Rolling Stone, President Obama suggests that DADT repeal is on track, and appeals to repeal advocates to take it slow and "keep the long view in mind." Well, to paraphrase Keynes, in the long view we're all dead.

Legislatively, DADT repeal (or whatever you'd like to call the far-short-of-repeal compromise legislation created by Winnie Stachelberg at the Center for American Progress) is dead this month, and stands next to no chance of passing during the lame duck session. This is a Congress (and a President) that refused to support a vote on health care reform during last January's quasi "lame duck" session before Scott Brown was seated. There's no reason to believe that they'd "man up" any better over a gay civil rights issue.

So that means the President's strategy on DADT repeal is now a bust. Either we lose the House, and nothing happens on gay civil rights for, oh, another 14 years, or we barely hold on to the House, and members are so shell shocked they don't touch what they consider "controversial" legislation (i.e., anything even vaguely progressive) for another generation or two.

Rather than acknowledge the reality of how bad things are, the President would like you to believe that everything is on track, and if you'd only give him a little more time (say, until after the upcoming elections) everything little thing is gonna be all right. Then, in a few months, after you've already voted for Democrats once again, and you suddenly realize that the President wasn't quite telling the truth - that DADT is still f'd, and going nowhere fast, along with DOMA and ENDA - the President will move the goal posts a wee bit further, suggesting that if we give him one more term, then he'll be able to finally get to his gay civil rights promises.

http://gay.americablog.com/2010/09/obama-on-dadt-keep-long-view-in-mind.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Where is a that smiley?
Found it!

:banghead:

I have said it from the beginning -- this Admnistraiton will kick this can down the road as far as they can. In the meantime, good American men and women are being ousted from the military -- something we cannot afford as a country.

Face it LGBTs, they are not going to hand it to you -- you (and your allies) are going to have to take it from them. It's time to amp up the heat on all fronts -- judicial, political, financial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 03:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. +++++
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonePirate Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unless the SC overturns it, DADT will be around until at least 2017 unless
A true, progressive Dem defeats Obama in the 2012 primaries. This administration could not care less about its LGBT supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. It doesn't care about ANY of its supporters except Wall Street - which has deserted them.
This is so fucked up. DADT should have been dealt with on Day 1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fucking cowardly bullshit.
Sick of hearing that 'long haul' crap from so called Democrats, nothing Democratic about that stand in any way.

Gutless and cowardly.

I am remembering a despicable post here that told GLBT DUers basically this same shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. The 3rd and 4th paragraphs on page 5 give the exact words
the President used. http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/209395?RS_show_page=5

Don't give up, it will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Are these the paragraphs to which you refer?
Edited on Tue Sep-28-10 04:03 PM by Stinky The Clown
ARGH - hit Post too soon . . . . . Here is what I intended to include:

Understandably, everybody has a great sense of urgency about these issues. But one of the things that I constantly want to counsel my friends is to keep the long view in mind. On social issues, something like "don't ask, don't tell." Here, I've got the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff both committed to changing the policy. That's a big deal.

You get credit for that.
Now, I am also the commander in chief of an armed forces that is in the midst of one war and wrapping up another one. So I don't think it's too much to ask, to say "Let's do this in an orderly way" — to ensure, by the way, that gays and lesbians who are serving honorably in our armed forces aren't subject to harassment and bullying and a whole bunch of other stuff once we implement the policy. I use that as an example because on each of these areas, even those where we did not get some grand legislative victory, we have made progress. We have moved in the right direction.


Why is getting the SecDef and JCS "committed" such a big deal? All it takes to get their "commitment" is a simple "do it."

And the rest of this sounds like it was excerpted from that stupid 90 point list of "accomplishments" that included such gems as "started to consider thinking about doing X"

Sorry. This is no news at all and no reason for anything apart from a dim view of any hope for real change. I don't see and commitment in any of the words in those two paragraphs. Are they, in fact, the ones to which you were referring?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. bullshit circle d!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. As usual, you blame exactly the wrong party. Repeating yourself ten times doesn't make you right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe the next Dem president needs to be old.
Someone without a lot of time left and a sense of urgency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Best Post in Thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. wiser and more anti phony wars! new dems seem to suck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. Well stated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. And homeless. THAT's urgency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. More smiley-face euphemisms for "don't worry your pretty
little heads about it, it'll some along some day, just you wait and see".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. I've been taking the "long view" on DADT repeal for almost two years
Edited on Tue Sep-28-10 07:46 PM by Unvanguard
and I am growing tired of it.

Show us some results, Mr. President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Dan Choi is now unemployed thanks to this "long view". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. Tell it to the lesbians being sexually assaulted and blackmailed
by DADT. Lesbians of Color being the worst affected.

I'm so sick of his cowardly bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VMI Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
15. Personal feelings don't affect policy decisions?
Bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. You said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
17. Well . . . cheer up . . . the Log Cabin Republicans are getting the job done.
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
18. Just goes to show
that if you live long enough, you see history repeating itself. During the Civil Rights debates in the 60's there were two sides: Dr. King advocated to go slow as it takes time to change attitudes. The other side, represented by the Black Panther Movement, Malcom X and other activists basically said Justice Delayed is Justice Denied (I think it was one of the Supremes that said it first). As much as I loved Dr. King, the second group was the correct side. We don't need to wait, the bigots need to evolve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. Does anyone believe that there will be MORE votes to repeal DADT next year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC