Woodward just told O'LOOFAH stuff. It's gonna be early A.M. to e-mail Scabbrow tomorrow

[UTUSN]

He said that:

1) Shrub sort of listened to the very experienced/knowledgeable MEN (O'LOOFAH's words) surrounding him - Cheenee, Powell, Darth Rums, and Poppy - but his main goal was "to free people".

2) That the President is focused on domestic issues not WAR (something wrong with that?!1), oh, except for really being good on fighting Al Quaeda and will be doing even more on that.

3) SoS is a real-hawk (O'LOOFAH's words) who aligned with GATES & (PETRAEUS?) and the President doesn't really listen to her.

4) The President *does* listen/value PANETTA.

5) The President brushed WOODWARD off (O'LOOFAH's words), opening the interviews with "You're on the clock" and ending with "See ya around." O'LOOFAH was shocked-SHOCKED that the President told him that his sources were better than the President's. WOODWARD tried to act shocked that the President asked him whether he wanted to be in charge of Defense Intelligence but O'LOOFAH burst his bubble saying the President told O'LOOFAH to play for the NBA, "That's what he says to people."

*****************So tomorrow the interviewer of comatose sources (CASEY) is due to be on the Scabs circus and will doubtlessly be lionized. I'll be up early to send them (their e-addy form is mostly activated during the circus's on-air hours) an e-mail like this:

The bottom line of WOODWARD's book is that the media yakkers are shocked-SHOCKED that the President was NOT the poodle for PETREUS that they portrayed him as being, that he actually exercised decision-making and leadership, that he wasn't a Lib weenie as they portrayed him, who was grasping onto PETRAEUS as a lifeline to manly-manliness.

[blue sky at night]

1. reading your post makes my head spin...

really cool with all the code words and nicknames but really if you want to be taken seriously......just a thought.

[Uzybone]

2. I dunno

neither Woodward or ORielly are trust worthy. ORielly is few clicks better than Hannity.

The narrative is nice, and fits a lot of things Ive been reading (Clinton is a powerful hawk, the military tried to bully the President etc.) but I don't trust the Woodward of today.

[UTUSN]

3. I think my contempt for both of them should be clear...

On Edit: Actually, counting HANNITY, my contempt should be on all THREE, instead of BOTH.

[Uzybone]

4. indeed it is

I'm sure the M$M will report it as fact though.