Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Governor Schwarzenegger vetoes bill to ban shackling of pregnant female prisoners

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 07:52 PM
Original message
Governor Schwarzenegger vetoes bill to ban shackling of pregnant female prisoners

Governor vetoes bill to ban shackling of pregnant female prisoners

My organization, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children, was contacted last fall by Pauline Latu, a woman being held in Contra Costa County Jail. She had never been in jail before, and her charges were for a nonviolent crime. She found out she was pregnant while she was in jail and was released about two weeks before she delivered her baby.


She went to court at least 10 times, and every time she left the jail, she was shackled -- sometimes around her belly, sometimes attached to another prisoner. Near the end of her pregnancy, she developed pre-eclampsia and had to be hospitalized shackled to her bed, having to ask permission from a guard every time she had to go to the bathroom.

----------------------------------------


Our bill, AB1900, faced no opposition. It passed the Legislature without a single no vote. We joined together with more than 50 organizations, including medical groups, county boards of supervisors and women's rights organizations, all of whom wrote letters and testified in support of our bill.

----------------------------------------


On Monday, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed our bill. This veto is particularly mean spirited and only serves to support the stereotype that incarcerated women are dangerous and must be subdued at all times. During these horrendous budget times, when there is a steadily shrinking safety net, AB1900 was an inexpensive solution to a human rights problem.



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/opinionshop/detail?entry_id=73370&tsp=1#ixzz10sKmaYGT





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Shame on him.
Just when I think he might be getting a clue...Nope.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. wtf? Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. His stated reason...
(from the article linked in the submitter's post)

To the Members of the California State Assembly:

I am returning Assembly Bill 1900 without my signature.

This bill would prohibit the shackling of pregnant inmates and wards during transport to and from correctional facilities except when other less restrictive restraints are deemed necessary.

Additionally, this bill would require the Corrections Standards Authority (CSA) to develop guidelines concerning the shackling of pregnant inmates and wards during transport. However, CSA's mission is to regulate and develop standards for correctional facilities, not establish policies on transportation issues to and from other locations.

Since this bill goes beyond the scope of CSA's mission, I am unable to sign this bill.

Sincerely,

Arnold Schwarzenegger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. I worked at a prison one time. I was answering the phones. A female
prisoner called and said she was in hospital and she had just had a baby. I congratulated her and we chatted for a while. My boss heard me and asked if I knew this prisoner was always in jail and had six kids in government care. I felt like such a chump. Since then I've had less sympathy for women who live illegal lifestyles and have little babies at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. yes, that one prisoner


sure showed you.


I suppose now, because of what you've posted here about a single phone call, we shall all have no further sympathy for pregnant inmates.

Thank you for that valuable service.


:eyesrollingthingy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leftist Agitator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Wht the fuck is your post supposed to mean?
Seriously, what the fuck? I don't understand what it is that you're trying to say here.

Please to explain it, yes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Depends on the case. Some people are just evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leftist Agitator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Well, you're a fucking asshole.
Welcome to ignore. You have the ignominy of being the only one on the list. Congrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. So we should torture them while they give birth?
That's probably really good for the baby, too, I'll bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. Great job California
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uncommon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. They shouldn't put anything around their stomaches, but I see no reason
they shouldn't have handcuffs just like any other prisoner would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. There are plenty of reasons why this is a problem. Do some reaserch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. Like father like son?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC