Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Map showing percent below poverty level (most recent) by state

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 09:05 PM
Original message
Map showing percent below poverty level (most recent) by state
Edited on Tue Sep-28-10 09:06 PM by geckosfeet
Percent below poverty level (most recent) by state

Surprising to me that District of Columbia is #4(18.9%),then New York tied at 16(14.2%) and California at 20(13.3%)

I would expect that living at the federal poverty level is a LOT harder in DC and NY and CA than say Mississippi or Tennessee.

In any case, this is a national shame.


# 1 Mississippi: 21.6%
# 2 Louisiana: 19.4%
# 3 New Mexico: 19.3%
# 4 District of Columbia: 18.9%
= 5 Arkansas: 17.9%
= 5 West Virginia: 17.9%
# 7 Kentucky: 17.4%
# 8 Texas: 16.6%
# 9 Alabama: 16.1%
# 10 South Carolina: 15.7%
# 11 Oklahoma: 15.3%
# 12 North Carolina: 15.2%
# 13 Georgia: 14.8%
= 14 Tennessee: 14.5%
= 14 Idaho: 14.5%
= 16 Montana: 14.2%
= 16 Arizona: 14.2%
= 16 New York: 14.2%
# 19 Oregon: 14.1%
# 20 California: 13.3%

More bar graph data at the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. 14 red states in the top 20 if I counted right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes and if you look at the map the highest poverty density is in the south.
Edited on Tue Sep-28-10 09:22 PM by geckosfeet
But, this goes by federal poverty levels. You can make that go a lot farther down south than in DC, NY or CA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Haley #1, Piyush #2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newest Reality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ah, if I read it correctly,
it states that this data is from 2004.

A lot has happened in the last six years, so up-to-date information would probably be more useful and relative. We know that poverty rates have been increasing dramatically and I would bet that the positions and percentages have changed and shuffled since then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. We're number 19!
The new chant for those in unemployment lines.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC