Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Something, something, something, "hippie-punching" something somethig "disappointed"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 10:15 PM
Original message
Something, something, something, "hippie-punching" something somethig "disappointed"
Okay, I don't usually do the "all the other bloggers are doing it" stuff if I can help it. But today I decided, what the hell! I've supported the Obama Administration this far, and the Democratic Party since.....my whole life, basically. So why not voice an opinion about whether I feel like the tone of things said recently by the Administration I voted for and that in not quite two years seems to be working on its campaign promises, even if they aren't addressing the issues I totally think they should--

I know I'm not really a hippie. I'm a gutless armchair conformist office-job non-marching virtual-skinned avatar of liberal checkbook and e-activism. I got no real cred, man. So maybe that's why I don't really feel "punched". I'm not whining, and I'm still going to vote, just like I always do. And so are many of the other people like me--just politically committed regular Democrats who long ago internalized the meaning of the phrase "the lesser of two evils".

If you take a look at what I blog about, right up there with the church/state issues are civil liberties and gay rights issues.

I don't see enough progress with these. In my mind, Gitmo should have been not just closed, but the ridiculous allegations regarding the downside of closing should have been met with real, factual, clear resistance. The Bush Administration's detention policy is sheer bullshit. The lame legal contortions regarding who to try in civil courts and who to try in military tribunals is weak because a) the Bush Administration never seemed to care enough to create a coherent strategy and b) I don't think the Obama Administration really believes civil courts aren't the right way to go, judging by past successes. I think a full-court press by Holder and others in Justice should have refuted the crap put out by Liz Cheney and the like and I would have liked to see that in Year One. It didn't happen.

I also don't think the Obama Administration is right re: assassinations or drones. I don't think they are quite right re: wiretapping (no shock, though, re: Obama's Senate voting record). I do think ending DADT with an executive order would cut through a lot of bullshit--especially since recent court rulings have shown it's just wrong. But I understand why Obama's biding his time for a congressional vote--to ensure maximum public acceptance of its legitimacy.

I am disappointed. I'm always disappointed, though. I always wish government would hew just a little bit more to my ideals. And I guess I must be used to it not doing so. But I know that if I keep trying, and keep voting, even if not for my ideal candidates, but at the very least against people who I think suck and would do absolutely nothing I want--then I can see things get a little better. That's the perspective I take on it, anyway.

Just a little bit better. A little better, all the time. As opposed to Rand Paul, Sharron Angle, and Joe Miller. For the love of pasta, can any one of us afford a future where Louie Gohmert looks like one of the sane members of Congress, and Trent Franks is one of the smart ones? Me, I don't think so! So disaffected or disappointed or disgruntled or even a little insulted--we still do have to vote Democratic, and get less awful people in. And maybe that will put starch in the spines of Democratic legislators who considered being fence-riding DINO desperados.

The only way for the Tea Party to succeed is for us reasonable people to stand back. There is definitely a time and place for criticism, and I am full of complaints, but I can't remake the world--only participate in its remaking--so I say--do what you can.

Vote for incremental slow-ass unsatisfying, less-worse, change you can plausibly accept happening in a real world of multiple opposing viewpoints and various contingencies--

instead of allowing the party of no, the party of numberless budgets, the party of tax cuts for the wealthy forever, the party of science-denial, the party of "suck it, sick people, old people, poor people", the party of okay with racism and sexism and theocracy and Islamophobia and homophobia, the party of "No we can't", the party of fear, the party of war mongering, the party of irresponsibility, the party of lying and the party that gave us Watergate, Iran-Contra, Iraq-gate, the de-regulation of the banking industry with two major bail-outs in the last 20-something years, and no sense of accountability whatsoever.

But in the meantime, I will counsel the Democrats as follows: You ever hear the phrase "Dance with the one what brung you?" We brung you--not the other way about. And we do expect you to do the things we actually elected you for. So, um, do us the favor of doing them. And never mind the bollocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Remember
when you say, "I don't see enough progress", it took Bush and his Evil cohorts 8 years to fuck everything up. It is going to take alot longer than that to fix everything. Its only been a year and a half and he's had to deal with spineless Democrats in the senate and republicans to seem bent on destroying America from the inside out. But thats just my "spin" on things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. You've got your reasons to vote. I have mine. I do not understand people who say
give me a good reason to vote dem or even vote at all. If people can't think for five minutes and find their own personal reasons, then mine or yours are not going to make any difference to them.

Clearly you have a considered and reasoned perspective. It will evolve and grow. No one can give this to you. It comes from soul searching and introspection. If people can't trouble themselves to work through their own stuff it is unreasonable to expect anyone else to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue sky at night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Your last two paragraphs took my breath away.......
you go and tell it on the mountain! YOU ROCK!!! I made a sign from your words!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh , "ahemn", mistakenly responded to my own post.
I'm sure this happens all the time....

Yes I am self -kicking. I know, I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. very well said. i love this line...
"maybe that will put starch in the spines of Democratic legislators who considered being fence-riding DINO desperados."

bravo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-10 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm glad you like it--
I mean every line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. One of my biggest issues is civil liberties.
And Obama is actually WORSE than Bush on civil liberties.

If there's ever been a worse violation of civil liberties in recent history than a president demanding the right to assassinate US citizens without a trial and demanding courts refuse to hear cases due to state secrets, I can't think of what it is.

Strangely enough, the same people that screamed bloody murder about the Patriot Act are silent about this and get offended when it's mentioned. Guess it's ok with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC