closeupready
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 12:04 PM
Original message |
If we lose the House, the blame lies with the corporate sellout Democrats. |
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 12:06 PM
Response to Original message |
1. The house has put out some very good legislation. |
|
It is the Senate that has been the problem.
|
alcibiades_mystery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message |
stray cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The voters and non-voters decide elections - the voters will get who they prefer |
|
Edited on Wed Sep-29-10 12:09 PM by stray cat
its not that complicated
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
|
:sarcasm:
Or maybe the blame will lie with Democrats who would rather shoot off their own foot than compromise, or vote for someone who did.
|
closeupready
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. I would actually like to respond to this point: |
|
There are plenty of independents (and single issue voters). If the Democrat says, "I will represent your interests better than they will!" and then, after winning office, they represent instead the interests of their biggest campaign donors even when those interests conflict with the interests of the aforementioned independents, then that voter will look for someone new whose personality does not carry the taint of corruption.
Not for anyone here, of course, but for many of these voters, that means sometimes voting Republican, sometimes Green - whoever they believe is more likely to actually do what they promise, i.e., someone who has not yet proven themselves to be the stereotypical elected official for hire.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
19. You want to have a Republican Rep in your district? |
|
I'd be humiliated to be represented by the Republican running in my district. There is nothing my Democrat could do that would prevent me from voting for him and being glad to do so. I only bring up his campaign to point out to people that it isn't just the blue dogs who do this triangulating bullshit and that everybody has stuff they're disgusted with.
|
closeupready
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
22. My rep, Nydia Velazquez, is clean - her record is spotlessly progressive. |
|
So no, when she comes up for re-election, I'm THERE for her. In the trenches. She is a goddess to me.
I'm sorry if you don't have that going for you.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
24. She opposes the 9/11 trial in NYC |
|
That took me all of 2 minutes to find. She's not perfect.
|
closeupready
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
25. Nice try at besmirching someone who opposed the Iraq War from the beginning, |
|
continues to oppose it, opposing the Surge and escalation of war in South Asia, and basically is someone who - speaking here from the "Far Left" - does an outstanding job representing her constituents and their interests. So she opposes the 9/11 trial in NYC. Big deal. I love her, and if I didn't, I certainly wouldn't bring her up in this discussion.
The larger point is, your choices suck. Just what concrete steps have you taken to change that?
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
26. Pointing out a flawed political view is not besmirching |
|
That's the entire point. Nobody is perfect. If you dwell on the negative, you're sure to find plenty in anybody.
And you think my choices suck? Just who do you think my choices are??
|
closeupready
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
28. You basically stated in post #9 that |
|
your elected officials claimed to be environmentalists on some level during their campaigns, but now they seek more logging. So I have no idea who you are referring to, but seems like I don't need to make an assessment - your post implied your elected officials are part of the problem, of selling out. That is, you're implying yourself that your choices suck. My choices don't suck.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
31. Peter DeFazio sucks? Or he's not perfect?? |
|
And Ron Wyden, definitely not perfect. But sucks???
|
vi5
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Pretty much nailed it.... |
|
Great, simple summation.
Those yelling at people on here are looking for a simple scapegoat. The fact is if the numbers of "the left" who are supposedly going to sit the election out (which I don't think is reality, but for the sake of their delusions let's go with it) were so monolithic and decisive on election days then....well wouldn't it make sense to meet those people's needs? Or listen to them? Or heaven forbid not insult them?
If the numbers are insignificant then why waste your time yelling at them and trying to convince them.
|
PVnRT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
23. Maybe those corporate Democrats ought to compromise every once in a while |
|
It sure would be a change of pace, instead of demanding that the liberal wing do everything.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
|
Voting for Bernie Sanders' free clinic money was a compromise. Allowing abortion insurance riders was a compromise. Increasing Medicaid benefits to adults was a compromise. Cigarette tax increases is a compromise. Benefits for the part-time unemployed was a compromise. Just about any time you say "corporatist sellout", they look at the same bill and see where they have made a compromise.
|
Recursion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
pampango
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 12:22 PM
Response to Original message |
5. And if the repubs underperform, they'll blame the teabaggers who, in turn, will blame RINO moderates |
|
The one thing you can count on is that no politician or political grouping will ever admit that it was their fault. Folks on the left and right will always be at odds with the moderates (relatively less wacko might be a better term for repubs) in both parties and none ever say "This defeat/underperformance was our fault."
The right (teabaggers, etc.) will contend that repubs weren't conservative enough if they don't do well. The left will say that Democrats were not progressive enough, if we lose the House or Senate. The moderates in the losing/underperforming party will say that the other party did a better job of appealing to independents, so they (the losing party) needs to be more moderate and go after the independents next time.
Lets hope its the repubs who are fighting among themselves after a bad election in 5 weeks.
|
RZM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 12:27 PM
Response to Original message |
6. If that happens there will be plenty of blame to go around |
|
I'll reserve some for people who would have voted democratic but failed to show up at the polls.
|
yurbud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message |
8. the sellouts had more impact on the senate, but those in house who opposed ending tax cut for rich |
|
deserve their share of tar and feathers too.
|
mod mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message |
11. and especially those like rahm who worked hard at alienating the base. |
closeupready
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Him and Gibbs both. Now Biden is getting in on that action. |
|
Really disappointing. Not so much perhaps with Emanuel or Gibbs, since they are de facto "youthful and inexperienced", but Biden's been around; he should know better. Oh, well.
|
kctim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 12:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
So moderate Democrats are going to vote for Republicans because their Democrat didn't go far enough left for them? Or, are you saying Democrats will not show up to vote so that Republicans will win, because their Democrat didn't go far enough left for them?
|
corpseratemedia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message |
15. and a bizarre organized attempt to squelch the democratic vote |
|
by continuously insulting democratic voters
I really hope dems and independents show up en masse and vote Dem to show that this nasty tactic failed and that they aren't off the hook -
If they lose a lot of seats which apparently blue dogs are looking forward to they get a chance to shit on the "hippie professional left fucking retard needs mental health testing" Democratic majority - I don't want to give them the chance to do so!.......!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
laughingliberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
clarence swinney
(673 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 01:12 PM
Response to Original message |
17. House passed Legislation |
|
Over 300 Bills are gathering Dust in Senate. Some passed with unanimous votes in House
McConnell made decision and said it January 2009. We will stop anything this President does to win in 2010.
Obama said that after meeting with GOP caucus in January 2009.
He knew it was War Time but chose appeasement with an impossible enemy
He did not scream and cuss. He should. Nations need Leaders no compromisers.
Go for your Middle Class.
GOP is now TRIPLE A PARTY anti-christ anti-america anti world
WSA owned olduglymeanhonest
|
harun
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message |
18. House has been doing awesome. Senate is poop. |
bobbolink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
20. That's exactly it, but the fix is in... its we liberals who will be blamed. |
B Calm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
21. I will hold my nose and vote for my blue dog, beats seeing a full fledged right wing Nazi win! |
rucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 02:37 PM
Response to Original message |
30. If we lose the House, I blame finger-pointing before we even lose the House. |
|
It makes us look like losers.
|
pgodbold
(953 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-29-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message |
32. If we lose the house and or the senate I take full responsibility. |
|
I am gay so I also accept responsibility for all hurricanes and earthquakes and famine and the sinking of the titanic and all pestilence and disease and old people left alone in nursing homes. Any questions?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:34 PM
Response to Original message |