Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Meg Whitman, 8/11/10: "Hold employers accountable for hiring only documented workers."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 01:58 PM
Original message
Meg Whitman, 8/11/10: "Hold employers accountable for hiring only documented workers."
In Case You Missed It: Meg Whitman's interview on KTLA

August 11, 2010

CUPERTINO - This morning Meg Whitman interviewed on KTLA where she discussed her consistent position on immigration, Jerry Brown's union ties and her plan to stimulate job growth in California. Watch the interview below:

Meg Whitman Interview On KTLA

WATCH HERE: http://bit.ly/bsBCUL

Michaela Pereira: She has spent a decade as the head of eBay, and has served in executive positions for companies like Procter & Gamble and Hasbro.

Frank Buckley: Now she is the Republican nominee to become the first female governor of California. We want to welcome Meg Whitman to our program. Welcome, good morning!

Meg Whitman: Thank you very much, happy to be hear.

Frank Buckley: Good to have you here. Let me get right to --- We are getting to some of our questions from our viewers, but I want to ask you about illegal immigration because it has been such a hot topic. You get beat up pretty bad on John & Ken the other day, but let me ask you about some of the allegations. 2009, you said you favored a path to legalization. 2010, you are not for a path to citizenship. What is the difference? Are you trying to have it both ways?

Meg Whitman: No, so I have been entirely consistent on this from the beginning despite what you read and hear, and I have never been for amnesty, ever, from day 1 on this campaign I have not been for amnesty. What I have been for is, we do have to get our arms around the illegal immigration question in California. I want to secure the borders. I want to hold employers accountable for hiring only documented workers. I want to eliminate sanctuary cities, but we have to combine that with a temporary guest worker program for the agricultural industry in the Central Valley. So that has been my stance from the beginning. From the beginning, I also came out against Prop 187 because I wanted a K-12 education for any child in California, and also, from the beginning said I did not think the Arizona law was the right thing for California.

Michaela Pereira: Let's move on to something that has dominated local headlines here, what is going on in the city of Bell. We have got a question from one of our viewers. Joyce from Hemet is asking "How is she going to handle the out- of-control pensions for government workers?"

Meg Whitman: Right, well what you have highlighted every day on this show about Bell is the perfect example of what is wrong with government in California and why Sacramento is also very broken because the state workers have very generous pension benefits. Maybe not quite as generous as Bell, but very generous pension benefits. This will cause California to run out of money, and we have to reset these pension benefits, so I want to renegotiate with the very powerful unions. We have to raise retirement ages. We have to extend vesting periods, meaning the amount of time that you have to work before you get those benefits. The employees will need to contribute more to their pension program, and for new rank-and-file public servants, they are going to have to come in under a different deal probably like what you get here at the station, a 401(k) program, not a guaranteed payout, and, you know, this is where I am very different than Jerry Brown because I will stand up to these public employee unions to get these changes made for the benefit of hard working California families, and Jerry Brown is bought and paid for by the public employee unions.

Frank Buckley: Well let's talk about jobs. That is concern number 1 for so many of our viewers, and I am going to try to find 1 of these that hits it, but 1 of our viewers, Walter says "Could you please be very specific in how you are going to create jobs in California since most companies are outsourcing to save money?"

Meg Whitman: Yes. Well your viewer is exactly right. It is the number 1 issue in California today with the 12.4% unemployment we have 2.3 million Californians who wake up every morning without a job, so here is my very detailed plan, which you can find on my website and in a booklet that I have created. First, we have got to do targeted tax cuts to give employers the confidence to hire again, and a very --- one that would be very relevant here in LA, I want to eliminate the factory tax. We are one of only 3 states in the whole country that charges manufacturers a sales tax on the equipment they buy to manufacture in the state, so if you are a small company like Super Digital here in LA, or a big company like Intel, every financial incentive is to go to an Oregon or Nevada or Colorado. Then I want to streamline regulation. You know, I have been to now almost all 58 counties. I have seen all kinds of businesses from agricultural to high tech to manufacturing to builders. Regulations are strangling us. Regulation upon regulation upon regulation. We have got to streamline this. I want to put a moratorium on all new regs til we get this sorted out. And then, lastly, we have to have an economic development team. You know, Rick Perry, the governor of Texas calls into our companies every month, every week. The governor of Colorado. We have to stand up and compete for our jobs. I want to set a goal of not losing another job to a neighboring state.

Michaela Pereira: We will see if we can get a few more questions from viewers in a second, but right now we want to talk about spending because a lot has been made in the news about the amount that you have spent on your campaign thus far. $100 million. You have outspent Jerry Brown significantly. Here is what he actually had to say about your spending. Lets run that sound real quick.

Jerry Brown: I was brought up, you know, to treat my money carefully, my campaign money the same way I treat the people's money. Meg has a different philosophy. She flies around in a private jet. She paid herself $120 million her last year at eBay. Then they had to lay off 10% of the work force. Wow! So, just a difference of philosophy. I think, going forward, the country, the state, the city, Bell, we all have to learn to live within means. Frugality, innovation and transparency with the people. That is my point.

Michaela Pereira: What is your philosophy on spending?

Meg Whitman: So I am a fiscal conservative. We are not spending taxpayers' money efficiently and effectively in Sacramento, and no one will do a better job of making the government do more with less and wringing out the waste and fraud and abuse that exists in the federal --- in the state government. And what Jerry Brown does not tell you is that while he is not spending much money on his campaign, the unions are, and he is --- his whole campaign right now, they have spent $12 million against me since the primary, so money is being spent on his campaign. It is just, he is not being completely forthright about that. And I want to make one other point to you, the money that I am spending on my campaign is mostly mine, and here is what is great news about this for the voters of California. I do not owe anyone anything except for the voters if they put me in office, and this is very different than a career politician who owes political favors. Do you think Jerry Brown is going to stand up to the public employee unions if they have bought and paid for his entire campaign? I do not think so.

Frank Buckley: One more question, this one from our viewer Darius from Los Angeles writes "Regarding Proposition 8, you have state you don't believe in gay marriage. When the case regarding Prop. 8 is brought to federal court, will you defend it…or will you stand up for the civil rights of all Californians regardless of your personal views?"

Meg Whitman: Darius is right, I am not in favor of gay marriage, but I am in favor of our civil union laws, and I want the courts to take its normal course here. You know, the ruling is likely to be appealed, but that is why we have a judicial system, so I will let the courts go forward.

Frank Buckley: We have so many questions, we wish we could have you here for many more hours, but they are running us along.

Michaela Pereira: We will invite you back ----

Meg Whitman: You know, when I am in LA, I would like to spend time with you. Thank you very much.

http://www.megwhitman.com/story/9561/in-case-you-missed-it-meg-whitmans-interview-on-ktla.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Love it! Thank you Meg!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. ROFL!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. !+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Toast, well done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Happy to be... hear?
Whoa... Nutmeg Witless has bad help...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. LOL
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. But she didn't know that her maid was no here legally
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Brown - Whitman debate number two this Saturday in 'Fresno looks like Detroit', California
Edited on Wed Sep-29-10 02:18 PM by Brother Buzz
Brown will certainly command the catbird seat. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. She and the other primary candidate ran a disgusting campaign to see who
could out-hate the other on the issue of immigration. There should be a zillion sound bytes to choose from. And more useful than the issue of documentation should be the issue of how uncaring and cold she seems to be.

We don't need more sociopathic corporate approaches to the economy and society....we need real people in leadership positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It's a major, MAJOR "hot button issue" with the freeps...
...they HATE McCain for his stand on immigration. Their two nicknames for him are "Juan McCain" and "McAmnesty." Every time they get in a heated debate over immigration they throw his name into the discussion and spew more bile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I think there's an easy path forward without getting tripped up on immigration. It should
be easy to cast her in a cold/corporate/sociopathic/uncaring light, willing to throw ordinary people under the bus. Those in need of help, those in public schools, those in unions, the unemployed, etc... are next.

She should be related to the last corporate leaders we had...the Bush administration were all multimillionaire/billionaire energy folks, and that worked out very, very badly economically, environmentally, morally, ethically...ordinary people got screwed just about every way possible. How is she different? That's the angle...and her home management with this ordinary person IS EMBLEMATIC OF HER SENSE OF ENTITLEMENT THAT HAS SCREWED UP THIS COUNTRY AND CREATED A CLASS OF ELITE VERY WEALTHY ROYALISTS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Another hypocritical repuke scum bag....shocker!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. I wonder what it feels like to have no shame, morals, or compassion.
Or to be $120,000,000 poorer because you're an empty shell of a person?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh my goodness folks, that was back when she thought
"SHE" wouldn't get caught. Don't you know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. When Nutmeg said "employers" she didn't mean herself
Gosh, what's all the hoo-ha about this? Meg likes to spend her money carefully, and get the most out of every dollar she spends. And let's face it: Hiring an undocumented immigrant is a sure-fire way to pay the lowest possible wage while getting the maximum amount of effort. If the worker gets too uppity, you just sic La Migra on her, and troll for another one at the open air job market.

Now, let's talk about what a governor Whitman would do for the working people of the state of California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. Another rich a-hole trying to buy their way into office then loot the treasury for their buddies
Nutmeg. Nutbag. Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm betting immigration will no longer be a priority issue in Meg's campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. Meg, how is that big steaming cup of FAIL tasting? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
19. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC