Creating Good Little Robots
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2010/09/god-thank-you-for-this-beating-creating.htmlby digby
Bill Gothard, Daniel Webster's mentor:
http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,944839,00.html His opening lecture on self-acceptance closes with a prayer to "give God a vote of confidence for how he has made us so far." Next comes family life. Children must be totally obedient. A religious teenager, for example, should not attend a church college if atheistic parents order him not to. As for a man's wife, she "has to realize that God accomplishes his ultimate will through the decisions of the husband, even when the husband is wrong." Citing I Thessalonians 5:18 ("In every thing give thanks"), Gothard even advises a wife whose husband chastises her to say, "God, thank you for this beating."
Besides following the chain of command in the family, Christians should also be obedient to their employers and their government, Gothard asserts. Only if an order from a parent, the state or a boss conflicts with God's explicit commandments may it be disobeyed.
snip
“I enjoy the advice he’s given,” Webster said of Gothard. “I think it’s been a major part of my life. I’m not ashamed of that. What he has said I believe to be the truth.” {St. Petersburg Times, 2/16/97, 9/28/03; Sarasota Herald Tribune, 3/09/97}
Grayson's Opponent Is A Member of the Hardcore Theocratic Right
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2010/09/graysons-opponent-is-longstanding.htmlOOPS! Grayson's opponent tied to "Biblical Stoning" movement
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/9/29/906308/-BREAKING-Graysons-opponent-tied-to-Biblical-Stoning-movementDid The "Taliban Dan" Ad "Backfire?"
http://www.religiondispatches.org/dispatches/sarahposner/3434/did_the_%22taliban_dan%22_ad_%22backfire%22/printFactcheck.org asserts that the quotes were taken out of context, claiming Webster was saying not to pick and choose Bible verses, and was pointing out that he doesn't pick and choose only the ones about wifely submission.
But Joyce tells me Factcheck.org misunderstands Webster's statements, even in context:
While the Grayson campaign can be taken to task for taking Webster's comment out of context, in the larger context, they're correct. Grayson's campaign argued that Webster seemed to be supporting submission in his comments to an audience of conservative men, whom he directed to pray that they would better fulfill their biblical duty to love their wives, and leave prayers about women's submission to their wives. However, the emphasis of these remarks, as those familiar with Christian rhetoric could recognize, is not on the optional nature of wives' submission. Wifely submission is part of an often-unbalanced equation to Christians who subscribe to "complementarian" or "patriarchal" marriage roles, where men must "love" and women "obey." Saying that a woman should pray for God's guidance in submission, if she wants to, is not leniency, but rather standard evangelical language that emphasizes individuals must obey biblical mandates regardless of how others around them behave. So, Webster is saying, men must be accountable to God for their responsibility to love their wives regardless of whether she submits -- that they must pray to do right, even if she doesn't.
However, the much more relevant application of this principle on following God's orders despite your circumstances is on women. Submission is a contentious and tricky issue even within conservative evangelical churches. Most churches promoting submission make certain to couple demands for submissive wives with those for loving, servant-leader husbands. But at the end of the day, it's women who bear the brunt of the principle; their obligations are to God, not to a husband who may or may not keep his end of the contract. Accordingly, the message is impressed by countless women's ministries and leaders that women must continue submitting even when their husband doesn't show love, because they owe their obedience, above all, to God. In circles that take submission seriously -- as does any organization associated with Bill Gothard -- that's what wives' options really look like.
Cult of Character
How the ‘secular’ Character Training Institute is working to build evangelist Bill Gothard’s vision of a First-Century Kingdom of God—one city, one state, one school board, one police force and one mind at a time.
http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/2450/Sarah Palin, faith-based mayor
How the vice-presidential nominee brought fringe biblical teachings to her work as the chief of Wasilla, Alaska.
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/09/18/palin_iaccHuckabee Hearts Gothard
http://www.cincinnatibeacon.com/index.php/content/comments/huckabee_hearts_gothard/