Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pentagon Losing Control of Bombs to China’s Monopoly

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
True_Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 01:36 AM
Original message
Pentagon Losing Control of Bombs to China’s Monopoly
Sept. 30 (Bloomberg) -- A senior manager at a company that churns out metals routinely used in U.S. smart bombs pauses in mid-sentence when his phone rings: a Wall Street stockbroker looking for information. He makes a note to have an assistant call back -- someone who is fluent in English, not just Chinese.

“It’s a seller’s market now,” says Bai Baosheng, 43, puffing a cigarette in his office in Baotou, China, where his company sells bags of powder containing a metallic element known as neodymium, vital in tiny magnets that direct the fins of bombs dropped by U.S. Air Force jets in Afghanistan.

A generation after Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping made mastering neodymium and 16 other elements known as rare earths a priority, China dominates the market, with far-reaching effects ranging from global trade friction to U.S. job losses and threats to national security.

The U.S. handed its main economic rival power to dictate access to these building blocks of modern weapons by ceding control of prices and supply, according to dozens of interviews with industry executives, congressional leaders and policy experts. China in July reduced rare-earth export quotas for the rest of the year by 72 percent, sending prices up more than sixfold for some elements.
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-09-29/pentagon-losing-control-of-bombs-to-china-s-monopoly.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. What exactly are the rare earth elements. Why does China control that market?
Are these elements found outside China? Sorry. I went to school before the expression "rare earth elements" was common. Could someone please explain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Probably lab creations
Edited on Thu Sep-30-10 04:22 AM by dipsydoodle
to fill known gaps in the periodic table. See here for example :

Welcome, ununseptium. With 117 protons, it is the latest super-heavy element to be created in the laboratory.

The discovery fills in a gap in the current periodic table of elements, and bolsters the idea that we may yet find an "island of stability" among heavyweight atoms, with elements long-lived enough to be useful.

Uranium, which contains 92 protons, is the heaviest element that is stable in nature. But researchers have synthesised a number of even heftier elements.

This effort has created a host of new atoms, containing as many as 118 protons. But there has been a gap in the periodic table where element 117 might be.

http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2010/04/newly-discovered-atom-helps-fi.html

Question is : if they maunfactured a really dense one would they call it Palinium ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. If they are lab creations, why do we buy them from China?
Why don't we create them ourselves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They're not easy to create
and the US may not have cracked it. Aside from that China may have patented the elements. If you think that sounds odd then its no odder than the US allowing patenting life forms which they have done.

DNA Patents Create Monopolies on Living Organisms http://www.actionbioscience.org/genomic/crg.html

In other words you can't have it both ways and if China has patented the elements then tough : the patent would be bullet proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks. We would have to do the research and find our own substitutes
for these products.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. This is about as incorrect as is possible. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Reply #2 is wrong
Edited on Fri Oct-01-10 01:08 AM by Posteritatis
They're seventeen metals which were thought to be very rare once upon a time - hence the name - though they're still all somewhat uncommon. Finding them is similar to most of the other elements - there's better deposits in some places than others due to the whims of geology and ease of access. Many countries have access to them, with India and Brazil having the best luck in that department last I heard.

Most of them are particularly useful in high-tech applications - lasers, nuclear energy, superconductors, X-ray machines, magnets (hence "rare earth magnet") and various alloys.

The full list is scandium, yttrium, lanthanum, cerium (which is far from rare), praesodyminium, neodyminium (the most common material used in rare-earth magnets, common enough to be used as kid's toys in science stores - they're quite fun!), promethium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium (whose name actually means "this is hard to get"), holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium and lutetium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's worse that that--we've actually shipped related manufacturing plants from here to China
Magnequench once made highly specialized rare earth magnets-crucial components in guidance systems of JDAM bombs and Cruise Missiles-here in the U.S., but they've outsourced our jobs and our national security to China.

In September 2003, Magnequench closed its last plant in Indiana, sending 450 workers into unemployment and moving its operation to China. The shift to China was no surprise. In 1995, the company was purchased by a front company for two Chinese companies, each of whose executives were in-laws of Chinese Premier Deng Xiaopeng. Magnequench’s CEO Archibald Cox Jr. had pledged in 1995 to invest heavily in the U.S plants, but in 1998 shut the first plant and moved operations to China. Cox is now managing the final phase of the transfer of operations to China.

http://www.counterpunch.org/stclair10252003.html
http://www.insightmag.com/news/2003/02/18/World/Missile.Technology.Sent.To.China-357426.shtml

http://www.counterpunch.org/stclair10252003.html
http://www.insightmag.com/news/2003/02/18/World/Missile.Technology.Sent.To.China-357426.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. The corporations are selling out U.S. national security to China and this got only 3 recs.
The U.S. is battling the multinational corporations for its survival and the majority of Americans are clueless. The prognosis is not favorable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC