Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Read: Not-so-Secret ‘Secrets’ the Pentagon Paid Thousands to Destroy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 06:50 AM
Original message
Read: Not-so-Secret ‘Secrets’ the Pentagon Paid Thousands to Destroy



Read: Not-so-Secret ‘Secrets’ the Pentagon Paid Thousands to Destroy
by Marian Wang
ProPublica, Yesterday, 3:41 p.m.

The Defense Department paid $47,000 to destroy 9,500 unredacted copies of a former Army intelligence officer’s new memoir, The Associated Press reported this week. The Pentagon contended that the book, “Operation Dark Heart,” by Anthony Shaffer, contained intelligence secrets and has therefore sought to destroy copies that were published before the book was redacted.

~snip~

Steven Aftergood of Secrecy News pulled together a side-by-side of redacted and unredacted versions of the book. It’s just a few pages, but it gives you a taste. Aftergood writes:
Perhaps 10% of the redacted passages do have some conceivable security sensitivity, including the identity of the CIA chief of station in Kabul, who has been renamed “Jacob Walker” in the new version, and a physical description of the location and appearance of the CIA station itself, which has been censored. Many other redactions are extremely tenuous.

… In short, the book embodies the practice of national security classification as it exists in the United States today. It does not exactly command respect.


A recent secrecy report card, as we noted, found that government agencies spent nearly $9 billion in 2009 to maintain secrets on the books, while spending $45 million on declassifying documents. That works out to almost $200 spent on keeping secrets for every $1 spent declassifying them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder how many movies and songs are not in circulation.
Because the pentagon does not want people knowing what is going on.

And what would be the consequences of that, maybe the last 10 years? Maybe the next 10?

But they would pound their chest and say it is for security, but for what and for who.

Sure hasn't secured what is due to me, and the Pentagon as a unit could easily be held partially to blame for many of those items.

Texas 5 point star is also a pentagon, as are the ones on the flag, as is the very name of their HQ the Pentagon.

So really what are they saying again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Actually blaming the pentagon is not accurate.
It is more cabal that includes private sector corporations and a few other groups.

It is why some movies are never played on TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. I recieved Top Secret intel reports in the Air Force during the Iran Hostage Crisis..
There were a lot of them - 20-100 or more per day.

98% of the content was being simultaneously broadcast on CNN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC