Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Right: Down, but Maybe Not Out: "...no signs of atonement within the movement."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 01:04 PM
Original message
The Right: Down, but Maybe Not Out: "...no signs of atonement within the movement."
NYT: The Right: Down, but Maybe Not Out
By SAM TANENHAUS
Published: May 20, 2007


(Tim Sloan/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images)
FORWARD, MARCH Paul Wolfowitz, a case study for conservatives.

WITH the death on Tuesday of the Rev. Jerry Falwell, the Baptist minister and founder of the Moral Majority, and the announcement on Thursday that Paul D. Wolfowitz would resign from the presidency of the World Bank, two major figures in the modern conservative movement exited the political stage. To many, this is the latest evidence that the conservative movement, which has dominated politics during the last quarter century, is finished.

But conservatives have heard this before, and have yet to give in. Weeks after Barry Goldwater suffered a humiliating defeat in 1964 to Lyndon B. Johnson, his supporters organized the American Conservative Union to take on the Republican Party establishment. After failing to unseat Gerald Ford for the Republican nomination in 1976, Ronald Reagan positioned himself for the 1980 election. The conservatives dismayed by the election of Bill Clinton spent the next eight years attacking him at every opportunity. And after failing to impeach Mr. Clinton, House Republicans far from retreating into caution or self-doubt, kept up the pressure and turned the 2000 election into a referendum on Mr. Clinton’s character.

What accounts for this resilience — or stubbornness?

For one thing, since its beginnings in the 1950s, conservatism has been an insurgent movement fought on many fronts — cultural, moral and philosophical. Leaders on the right, as well as the rank and file, have always believed that defeats were inevitable and the odds often long....

***

... after 9/11, neoconservatives and evangelicals found common cause in their shared belief in American exceptionalism and in the idea that the country’s values could be exported abroad. Mr. Bush was receptive to the synthesis, and it became the ideological centerpiece of the war on terror, with its stated mission to combat the “axis of evil” in a global “war on terror.”

Today, of course, this vision, has been widely repudiated, if not altogether discredited. The public has grown skeptical, or maybe just tired, of the hard-edged and often polarizing politics. And this change coincides with broad-based skepticism of the Bush presidency itself — as witnessed by Mr. Bush’s and his party’s perilously low approval ratings. The G.O.P.’s embrace of the conservative movement is beginning, some say, to resemble a death grip.

But there have been no signs of atonement within the movement....

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/20/weekinreview/20tanenhaus.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. They refuse to adapt to a changing reality, an absolute requirement for evolution.
Which leaves them only one path, extinction. We already know their fate, it's built into their model. Our big question is: will they be able to take us with them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Good question -- great post! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. What I want to know is: What can we learn from them about redeploying candidates?
They redeploy their best presidential candidates, they consider them elder statesmen and not losers. They support these candidates. Ronald Reagan did not go away after he lost out to Ford. He "positioned himself for the 1980 election."

What kind of support does our fractious party give to John Kerry? To Al Gore?

Just sayin'

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. THAT is an important point -- I agree with you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. No atonement means they are incapable of learning from their mistakes
And means they need to be beaten out of existence. Cannot WAIT for 2008 when this will be done. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoctorStrangelove Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-19-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hard-edged and often polarizing politics
It is curious that the NYTs should write that 'The public has grown skeptical, or maybe just tired, of the hard-edged and often polarizing politics.' I wonder how this seems to be contradicted by the very 'hard-edged and often polarizing' expression of political opinion in online forums.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-20-07 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Hi DoctorStrangelove!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC