Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Johnson & Johnson conducted a 'stealth' recall - hired companies to buy Motrin from stores

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 02:23 PM
Original message
Johnson & Johnson conducted a 'stealth' recall - hired companies to buy Motrin from stores
--Speaking of recalls, a senior official at the Food and Drug Administration says the agency should have acted quicker to crack down on Johnson & Johnson, which conducted a stealth recall last year by buying up defective packets of Motrin from stores nationwide. J&J apparently told the FDA in April 2009 that it planned to repurchase the defective Motrin, which didn't dissolve correctly. But it wasn't until July of that year that the agency said the company needed to do a proper -- and public -- recall, not a shadowy repurchasing program. Really, it's amazing that a major company like J&J could get away with something like that.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2010/09/consumer-confidential-fisher-price-toys-recall-johnson-motrin-fda-postal-service-stamps-mail.html

As the investigation into J&J has deepened, the focus has shifted to how the company handled recalls of products that didn't meet quality standards. Some batches of adult-strength Motrin didn't dissolve the way they were supposed to. That was a problem that could leave some of the medicine too weak.

But how J&J then hired companies to surreptitiously buy up the Motrin from retailers without revealing the issue — a so-called "phantom recall" — has become a cause for concern.

Just listen to the Food and Drug Administration's Dr. Joshua Sharfstein, principal deputy commissioner, who will testify before the panel chaired by Rep. Ed Towns (D-NY) today. In prepared remarks, Sharfstein says, the agency raised concerns with J&J early this year about the action "because it seemed strange that the company had paid a contractor to into retail stores across the country to purchase all available product while action like a regular customer, and not disclosing whether it was recall"

http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2010/09/30/130235595/johnson-johnson-execs-face-more-questions-on-phantom-recall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grilled onions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Find Their Business Practices Hard To Swallow
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. If McCain had been elected how would the FDA had respond?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. My confidence in corporate America has completely dissolved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. doesn't seem "strange" to me J&J did it on the sly.
Public recall hits the bottom line of profits.Can't ahve that.

Just goes to show how much corporations are thumbing their noses at ALL regs and rules.
They really don't give a shit, and being hauled in front of Congress is not big deal, won't affect their stock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC