Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Taxpayers Get $1 Billion Profit on U.S. Treasury's Sale of Citigroup Stake

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:11 AM
Original message
Taxpayers Get $1 Billion Profit on U.S. Treasury's Sale of Citigroup Stake

By Donal Griffin

Oct. 1 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Treasury Department earned a $1.02 billion profit for taxpayers from the sale of a 5 percent stake in Citigroup Inc. during the past nine weeks as markets slowed and the bank’s share price fell.

The Treasury sold 1.5 billion shares since July 26 for $5.9 billion, it said yesterday in a statement. That equals an average price of $3.93 a share, more than the $3.25 taxpayers paid for a stake in the New York-based bank during the financial crisis of 2008. The sales were handled by Morgan Stanley.

Treasury’s stake in Citigroup, the fourth-biggest U.S. bank by deposits, fell to 3.6 billion shares, or about 12 percent. The stake is worth about $14 billion. The department, headed by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, sold shares at a rate of 31 million a day, less than half the pace it needs to meet its goal of exiting the bank by the end of this year.

“I don’t think that’s good from Treasury’s point of view and I don’t think that’s good from Citigroup’s point of view,” Linus Wilson, a finance professor at the University of Louisiana, said in a telephone interview. “The longer the sale takes, the more chances that Treasury is going to have to sell some shares at a loss.”

U.S. taxpayers received Citigroup shares in the bank’s $45 billion bailout in 2008. Citigroup repaid $20 billion and the department converted the remaining $25 billion into a 27 percent stake. Treasury has been selling shares since April this year.

More...

http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ayT0LJ_D9ADo&pos=7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PoliticAverse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. So how much did the "moral hazard" cost taxpayers? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. K and R for the Teabag crowd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. Meh. We could have made more. Gold!
:rofl:

:hide:

K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. An 8.5 annual return (compounded) is pretty good but what level of risk was taken to achieve that?
I mean if I offer you this investment.

50% chance of +8.5% return
50% chance you lose your life savings.

It wouldn't be a very good investment. Without looking at the level of risk taken any investment can look good.
A lottery ticket has the potential for a billion % return on investment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Too much risk, and how much did Citi make in this time, and why didn't the government
take all profits while they were repaying the funds?

This was not just some standard investment. It wasn't just buying a bunch of Citi preferred stock. It was begging for the government to do something, while they had a gun to our heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. They should have bought Citigroup at $1 like the rest of us :)
Would have made 300% gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHandPath Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Puff piece...
We're still on the hook for $300 billion of Shiti's toxic assets, not to mention the garbage that they have sold to the Fed.

Sorry, but anything information coming out of the Treasury Dept is usually exactly the opposite in reality.

Oh, and Shiti's top execs are back to taking record bonuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC