Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Crisis in Pakistan: Possible Army Coup in Works, as US and Pakistan Clash

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:33 AM
Original message
Crisis in Pakistan: Possible Army Coup in Works, as US and Pakistan Clash
http://www.thenation.com/blog/155128/crisis-pakistan-possible-army-coup-works-us-and-pakistan-clash

Crisis in Pakistan: Possible Army Coup in Works, as US and Pakistan Clash

Robert Dreyfuss
October 1, 2010


Pakistan, it seems, is playing its trump card in the current crisis with the United States. The trump card, of course, is Pakistan’s control of the vital lifeline that supplies the more than 100,000 American troops in Afghanistan with everything they require, including fuel. More than 80 percent of US supplies pass by land from Pakistan to Afghanistan over mountain passes at places like Torkham. Without Pakistan’s help, the entire American effort in Afghanistan would collapse overnight.

Yesterday, in protest of a US military attack on a Pakistani border post that killed three Pakistani soldiers, Pakistan closed Torkham. Today, “militants” burned two dozen NATO oil tankers that were filled with fuel for the US-NATO war next door. (Since Pakistan has had a long history of creating, arming and training militants and terrorists, including the Taliban, it’s likely that those who carried out the attack on the tankers were acting on behalf of the Pakistani army and its intelligence service, the ISI.

Meanwhile, the army and the ISI appear once again on the brink of a coup d’état to oust Pakistan’s corrupt and discredited civilian government and either install a military dictator or rule from behind the scenes. There are various scenarios, including the installation of Nawaz Sharif, the rival politician who is much closer to the Pakistani military than the current President Ali Asif Zardari, and who also maintains better relations with the Taliban and with Saudi Arabia, Pakistan’s key Arab ally. It’s an internal political crisis in Pakistan that’s been building ever since the 2008 ouster of the previous military dictator, Pervez Musharraf, and it was drastically exacerbated by the floods that devastated the country. (Musharraf, incidentally, announced today in London that he’s forming a political party. Reports AP: “Musharraf says the only way to tackle Pakistan's ailing economy and its political infighting—problems exacerbated by recent floods—is to further bolster the army's role.”)

Needless to say, the United States has thrown lots of fuel on the fire by recklessly attacking Pakistan intensively this month. In September, there were at least 20 drone attacks on targets in Pakistan’s tribal areas along the Afghanistan border, and two armed helicopter attacks across the border into Pakistan, including the one yesterday that killed the three Pakistani soldiers. An Pakistani army officer told the Washington Post that the US action represents a direct challenge to Pakistan’s sovereignty and is a case of “attacking the Pakistani army.” Pakistan’s Interior Minister, Rehman Malik, said: “We will have to see if we are allies or enemies.”

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Possible army coup in works since Pakistan became a country
with the exception of when there were actual army coups
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. the present situation appears to be extra volatile
but yes, the potential always exists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. ==
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Pakistan has always housed Al Qaeda
And does so even more now that we are in Afghanistan. Our relationship with them was fine as long as we didn't ask them to actually help or our attention wasn't focused on them. The whole point of the Afghan invasion was to get Al Qaeda for good. We knew it would come to this eventually. Benazir Bhutto's death should have been evidence to us all that Pakistan would eventually be the center of conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. Pakistan drone attacks kill 12 suspected militants
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11458921?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

2 October 2010 Last updated at 08:04 ET


Pakistan drone attacks kill 12 suspected militants

Tribesman in North Wazaristan imposed a shut-down on Thursday in protest over drone attacks

Twelve suspected militants have been killed in two drone attacks in Pakistan's north-western tribal area.

It is the latest of at least 22 suspected US drone attacks in the past five weeks, part of an apparent crackdown on insurgents on the border.

The latest attacks come amid a row between Nato and Pakistan after a cross-border strike killed four Pakistani troops.

In response, Pakistan has stopped some Nato supplies crossing to Afghanistan.

...more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC