Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm pretty pleased with Rouse for CoS.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:21 PM
Original message
I'm pretty pleased with Rouse for CoS.
Obama wasn't going to tap Dean or Kucinich, and besides, anyone who comes out of Daschle's camp is a nice big step in the right direction.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/30/AR2010093007155_2.html?nav=hcmoduletmv&sid=ST2010093004161

(snip)

When Obama was elected to the Senate, he asked Rouse to be his chief of staff. By then, Rouse was a legend on Capitol Hill. A longtime and powerful aide to Senate Majority Leader Thomas A. Daschle (D-S.D.), who had just been defeated, Rouse was known as the "101st senator." He had close relationships with senators and often helped to manage tricky negotiations.

Rouse wrote a strategic plan for Obama to follow in the Senate. Two years later, as Obama was preparing to run for president, he came up with a similar plan. As the 2008 campaign drew to a close, Rouse once again handed Obama a thick black binder, this time with ideas for setting up the White House if he won.

It was Rouse who arranged the presidential transition, hiring John Podesta to run it.

Over the past 20 months, Rouse has been handed a string of messy problems and told to cut across bureaucratic lines to fix them. In late 2009, Obama asked him to grapple with the administration's policy for Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, after it became clear that the president would miss his self-imposed deadline to close the prison there. Although the facility has not been closed, officials credit Rouse with getting the process under control and coming up with an alternate site in Illinois.

More recently, Rouse helped create the administration's new consumer protection bureau, navigating competing internal factions (including between Emanuel and senior adviser Valerie Jarrett) to make Elizabeth Warren a senior adviser to the bureau.

On a personal level, colleagues describe Rouse as a calming presence, someone who is an "honest broker" and treats lower-level staff members well. After Daschle lost, one adviser recalls, Rouse spent weeks helping campaign aides find new jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. My hope is that he's less of an ideologue and bully
Gibbsie, especially, deserves a break from bullying.

I don't expect a sudden shift to extreme left wing policy, or even left of center policy. Obama has never been that, although his rhetoric has been at times, causing disappointment when he fails to live up to it.

I'm just overjoyed Emanuel is gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wait and see is my attitude...he's certainly not a progressive...
but Palin does hate him, so that's a plus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. He sounds good...
Let's see how it plays out.

Recommended.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm taking a wait-and-see attitude
Obama allowed Rahm and the others to put him in a bubble and cut him of from the rest of the nation. I hope Rouse is going to be one of the first "pops" in the bubble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. shrug -- we'll see. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. How familiar are you with Tom and Linda Daschle's past/current work with union busting law firms?
Edited on Fri Oct-01-10 01:51 PM by Better Believe It
Tom Daschle is currently employed as a "Senior Policy Advisor" by one of the biggest corporate law firms that has an entire department that specializes in helping corporations "outsource" jobs and another department to help corporations maintain "a union-free environment" and assist unionized employers in their efforts to defeat labor strikes and undermine union contracts!

Well, isn't that just wonderful.

I don't think any former politician who supports working people and organized labor could accept any position with a law firm that engages in those types of activities, even if the former politician doesn't oversee or participate directly in that firms anti-worker, anti-union activity.

You might want to investigate the Daschle's employment backgrounds and activities a bit more.

There is a reasonable chance and danger that President Obama might select Thomas Daschle to become his permanent Chief of Staff.

I think we can both agree that we'd prefer someone who is not Wall Street or corporate representative and anti-labor to become Chief of Staff. I think we've seen enough of that in this White House.

I'm sure there must be some competent liberal/progressive beyond Dean and Kucinich that could be appointed.

Can you think of any?

Oh .... Thomas Daschle's law firm is DLA Piper. Well, here's what they brag about on their website:

DLA Piper became one of the largest legal service providers in the world in 2005 through a merger of unprecedented scope in the legal sector. While large in scale, the merger strategy was simple – to create an international legal practice capable of taking care of the most important legal needs of clients wherever they do business. We wanted our clients to rely on receiving the right service for their particular matter, whether requiring seamless coordination across multiple jurisdictions or delivery in a single location.

Building strong and substantial client relationships was and remains the compass for DLA Piper's business strategy and future development. With Frank Burch as Chairman of our Global Board, DLA Piper today has 3,500 lawyers in offices throughout Asia, Europe, the Middle East and the United States. We represent more clients in a broader range of geographies and practice disciplines than virtually any other law firm in the world. Our client commitment is also our brand – everything matters when it comes to the way we serve and interact with our clients. If it matters to them, it matters to us.


Our clients range from multinational, Global 1000, and Fortune 500 enterprises to emerging companies developing industry-leading technologies. They include more than half of the Fortune 250 and nearly half of the FTSE 350 or their subsidiaries. As we build our global practices, we remain committed to maintaining regional practices around the world where we already do great work for longstanding clients.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. So anyone who ever worked for Tom Daschle is evil?
What has his wife got to do with it?

What has Rouse got to do with it?

Of course, you were not going to be happy with the choice no matter who it was, were you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I would never work for someone who is employed by a union busting outfit. How about you?
Edited on Fri Oct-01-10 04:50 PM by Better Believe It
No problem with that?

If not, well we just have different principals and morals.

I'm sure President Obama can find someone who doesn't carry that baggage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. So you'd starve rather than work for someone who worked for a
"union busting outfit?"

Are you condemning lawyers here again? If I represent drivers accused of dui then that makes me evil, right?

Even "union busting outfits" are entitled to representation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yes. I'd rather go to the food bank and homeless shelter than work for
Edited on Fri Oct-01-10 06:22 PM by Better Believe It
and prostitute myself to some corporate union busting anti-worker law firm.

I didn't realize that Thomas Daschle was in such dire straits and was forced to work for a right-wing union busting corporate law firm .... either that or starve.

How did he manage to get himself into such difficulty having been a United States Senator with connections?

And you think such anti-labor outfits are "entitled" to "representation" in the government!

Why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Representation by a lawyer
Edited on Fri Oct-01-10 07:14 PM by treestar
And I don't know if your "union busting outfit" conclusion is something I'd agree with, since I'm not going on your word alone.

How would there be any money for the food bank or the homeless shelter if nobody worked for one of those evil corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. So what kind of union busting is Thomas Daschle's law firm engaged in? This kind.
Edited on Fri Oct-01-10 10:16 PM by Better Believe It
Representing a legal firm that's specializes in flat out union busting for a fee is not the same as working for a business engaged in manufacturing, distribution, transportation, retail sales or numerous other common business activities.

Do you understand the difference?

You wrote: "I don't know if your "union busting outfit" conclusion is something I'd agree with, since I'm not going on your word alone."

You don't have to take my word for it. Here's some information posted on the website of the law firm DLA Piper, who Thomas Daschle serves as a senior policy advisor.


Labor-Management Relations

For our clients that are non-union, we provide advice and counseling on methods for improving employer-employee relations and maintaining a union-free environment. When union activity arises, we work closely with the company to combat organizing efforts and the election campaign. This may cover the entire spectrum from advice on strategies, methods, and techniques, to representation before the NLRB in unfair labor practice charges.

For our clients that are unionized, we provide assistance in all aspects of the management-union relationship, including the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements, contract administration, grievances and arbitrations, representation before the NLRB and the courts, and union decertification. Our attorneys have extensive experience in obtaining injunctions in cases involving wildcat and mass picketing strikes, as well as persuading the NLRB to seek relief for illegal secondary boycotts. We have defended employers in virtually every type of unfair labor practice case under the NLRA and similar state statutes such as California’s Agricultural Labor Relations Act.

Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)

We help our clients implement preventive measures, as well as representing them in administrative and court proceedings arising out of the various federal, state, and local laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination in employment based on race, sex, age, religion, national origin, and handicap, and those pertaining to equal pay. We have found that early representation helps avoid later problems and minimizes exposure. Most administrative charges of discrimination can be handled quickly and economically.

Litigation is an important aspect of EEO law. Our lawyers have represented companies in the defense of EEO charges and lawsuits throughout the United States, in both major class actions brought by the government or private parties and individual charges and suits.


Occupational Safety and Health

We have provided counsel and handled litigation pertaining to OSHA standards and citations. Our lawyers have represented corporations that have been cited by OSHA in some of the most serious fatality cases in the past 10 years, including a successful defense of one of the first criminal MOSH cases.

http://www.dlapiper.com/us/services/detail.aspx?service=3


As you can see, Daschle's law firm doesn't limit itself to union busting and strike breaking. They also help companies defend themselves from Equal Employment Opportunity and OSHA lawsuits.

Nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Thanks for posting this information.
I didn't know about it, and now I do. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. Rouse is a pro and I think will be an asset to the Obama Admin. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tilsammans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sounds good to me!
A tremendous improvement over Rahm-bo! :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Rouse for Class Of Service
never used that one...

Is that a new DSCP setting :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is an upgrade. The problem is in the Senate and Rouse is a Senate fixer.
The House still functions, but the Senate cannot get anything passed at all. Rouse will help out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. He sounds like a decent guy.
DU already hates him, of course, but that's to be expected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-10 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. (facepalm)
Sad, but true.

But then again, DU might be right. Wouldn't be the first time...or the thousandth.

So.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC