|
Exxon-Mobile is power, not substance. They have the power to push their disinformation and turn it into presidents and congress critters and policy, and so they do. What is our power to defeat them? Our main power is voting. That is actual power, not just public education and advocacy in a P.R. game in which they have zillions of dollars and we have none, or very little, and in which they own our public airwaves, along with our politicians.
You equate election fraud with Barbara Bush having children. That is a false comparison. If there were no George Bush, Exxon-Mobile and their cabal would invent one. Don't dismiss election fraud, or our potential power as a sovereign people, so glibly. Control of our elections is HOW they are imposing their agenda on us, HOW they get a friendly ear rather than a sock in the nose at EPA, and is HOW they have hijacked the US military for a corporate resource war, as well as installing their puppets in the White House. Electronic fraud is not their only means, but it is the coup de grace, and it is forever until we force it to be changed. Virtually undetectable control of vote counting. It's classic tyranny.
If you think that you are going to defeat Exxon-Mobile on moral grounds, you are wrong. That's like saying you are going to defeat George Bush or Dick Cheney on moral grounds. With electronic voting using secret code, corporations and their lackeys in government have become impervious to public opinion. There is no one to control them. There is no one to investigate them. There is no one to pull their corporate charter and dismantle them--our sovereign right as a people. And they know this.
I agree that this "breach of public trust is unparalelled...due to it's audacious nature and the planetary risk it puts us under." But do you think they and their super-rich cabal care a whit? Not at all. They are not morally persuadable. Ordinary people are persuadable. And we can and should do everything we can to persuade them. But I don't think that persuasion is the whole game, by any means. I remember reading a stat some time ago that about 80% of the American people favor strong environmental regulation--and whatever the percentage is now, it's still very high. Yet we have seen the EPA and all environmental regulation steadily eroded and undermined for more than two decades now. It's not so much, Do people want the environment protected? It's, What power do we have to achieve it, as government policy? Our MAIN POWER as a people is voting. That has been almost taken away. All we can do is try to outvote the machines' 5% to 10% handicap against us, added to all our other handicaps--the vast corrupt money/lobbying scene, and war profiteering (and oil profiteering) corporate news monopolies. The worst of it is the new electronic voting system, wherein NO ONE knows or can observe the counting of our votes.
I feel this way about a number of EXTREMELY SERIOUS issues--the Iraq War, where scores of people are getting slaughtered every day, and the Bush Junta assault on our Constitution and its assertion of tyrannical powers with virtually no opposition from Congress, Democratic or Republican. The Bush Junta = Exxon-Mobile & cabal. They are one and the same. So, when Bush asserts the right to make up his own laws, just figure Exxon-Mobile is making up its now laws. And when people are dying in Iraq, just figure they are dying for Exxon-Mobile. Because that is the truth. These issues are intimately related. We have an Oil Cartel puppet in the White House.
But HOW DO WE STOP THEM? You keep saying how serious global warming is, and their lies about global warming. True enough. But what do we do about it?
1. Boycott them. Okay. That has possibilities. Difficult but doable. But what of Chevron? What of Shell? And all the others? We could buy only Citgo gas, and help the Venezuelans out (at least their government is using the revenues for the public good). Or we could give up use of gas--very hard for many people. More of a long term project. Would take a lot--and I mean a lot--of organization, and...gulp...government involvement. (Not so outlandish--some state/local governments have been pro-active on global warming.)
2. Focus an intense campaign on discrediting Exxon-Mobile--specifically for their disinformation on global warming. Maybe even more difficult, cuz of their zillions not just for advertising, but for buying journalists and whole news organizations. Maybe start with certain highly focused groups--as the anti-sweatshop movement started with students on college campuses (and products sold in campus stores and in college shopping areas). So you get people educated, in spite of Exxon-Mobile's P.R. zillions. Then what? They control our election results. They've bought most of our politicians. Their lawyers write our laws. We have a situation right now of 75% of the people opposed to their oil war, and yet they are ESCALATING the war. You could conceivably win the P.R. battle, but how do you actually effect change? It's naive to think that Exxon-Mobile cares what the truth is, or what the American people think. They are into MANIPULATING news and opinion and disempowering and disenfranchising people, not listening to people. Even if 100% of the people turn against them, and understand that they are liars, why would they care? They only understand POWER.
3. Ignore them--they are hopeless--and concentrate on alternative energy development, and non-polluting transportation, to make them irrelevant and drive them out of the oil business. Another long term project.
4. Throw Diebold and ES&S into 'Boston Harbor' NOW, re-establish transparent vote counting, and start electing REAL representatives of the people, who will, a) start cleaning up the filthy lobbying scene, and all the ways that the Global Corporate Predators fix our elections, b) bust their power, bust their monopolies, strongly regulate them (and possibly even seize their land, their money, their oil facilities--bust them completely), c) put us on a 5-year plan to get off oil and coal (if we can put men on the moon in ten years, we can get off oil and coal in five), and d) join with other nations to solve the problem.
Of these four ideas, I think no. 4 can have the most immediate results, and is also the most doable. If all the votes were counted, we would already be seeing dramatic reform. A Zogby poll put the number of people who want transparent vote counting at 92%. That's an even bigger mandate than most polls on the environment (which run in the 60% to 80% range for protection), and bigger than the Iraq War (75% opposed). You don't have to convince anybody of anything. You just have to achieve transparent vote counting, and the voters will do the rest--they will start electing good, honest people, who will act in the public interest. It's both a short-term and a long-term project.
So that's all I'm saying. POWER is the issue--not morality, not truth, not what is right. What is our power?
|