|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Kadie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-04-10 12:13 PM Original message |
Christine O'Donnell claimed in 2006 debate that China was planning to take over US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-04-10 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. as Hu rears his head over Delaware... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-04-10 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
2. They want our mice with human brains. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-04-10 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
3. OK - explain this to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-04-10 12:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. It's classified as fiction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kadie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-04-10 12:24 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Maybe she also dabbled in fortune telling? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-04-10 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
4. Economically, they have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whoa_Nelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-04-10 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
7. Playing poker with O'Donnell would be way to easy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-04-10 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
8. Did Christine specify if it were to be a friendly rather than hostile takeover? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-04-10 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
9. Boy so we had nuts in political office back then because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC