How quickly and neatly Hookergate II seems to have...

[Mr_Jefferson_24]

...disappeared off MSM's radar. Gosh I wonder if this had happened under Clinton's administration and it had been mostly Dems on the client list what MSM would have done with it -- how many consecutive weeks would they be leading with it? I REALLY REALLY HATE MSM.

[sam sarrha]

1. i hate em all.. dont watch TV anymore, get my news from Randi Rhodes, Thom Hartman, etc AAR ONLY an

the Internet.. DU etc

[Mr_Jefferson_24]

2. Sounds like a good plan. If nothing else it would help lower my blood pressure.

[shenmue]

3. It'll be back.

:bluebox:

[malaise]

5. Yes it will

Lawyergate/liargate now. :D

[Philosoraptor]

4. Once big dick's name came up on the hooker list, it was all over.

That's unsubstantiated of course, like everything cheney says.

Everyone knows only Democrats are sexual deviants, (cough cough, mark foley, robert livingston, henry hyde, now where's that list with the thousands of repub pervs on it? Oh yeah, google.

[Mr_Jefferson_24]

8. Big Dick wasn't required to submit to any questioning...

...or sobriety testing after he mistook his hunting buddy for a quail either. Different rules for the criminal elite.

[lligrd]

6. Simple, Hookergate With Repugs Is Too Repulsive To Fathom

Clinton had some charisma and people could imagine him having an affair (and Repugs could dwell on it) but who in the hell wants to picture Cheney with a hooker, or Rove with Gannon?

[lonestarnot]

7. Icky.

Ratings.

[rucky]

9. Because Democrats are held to different standards than Repugs...

and by "different standards," I mean "standards"