cnn's 'the democrats are fucked' page

[spanone]

fair & balanced

http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/

[laureloak]

1. The bandwagon approach.

[TwilightGardener]

2. Guess there's no need to bother voting, we've already lost.

:eyes:

[HopeHoops]

3. Amazing, isn't it? "News" is what the opinion channels say now, not what has happened.

CNN is bad, and FOX is of course another story. That piece of shit is ALL opinion, and Murdoch's at that. I can't believe they are allowed to use the word "News" in their name and logo. There isn't any.

[Supersedeas]

10. opinions offered as a public service or a paid service brought to you by advertisers

[HopeHoops]

14. "And NOW a word from our sponsors."

In the case of FOX, there's only one - the GOP.

[Supersedeas]

22. pretty much...but the same can be said about many of the other networks

[Blue Owl]

4. All the pretty propaganda

So pretty, so very pretty...

[notesdev]

5. Maybe not fair and balanced

but certainly accurate.

The people who whine the most about it are likely the same ones who put us in this position in the first place.

I've been trying to head this off for a year and a half already - basically from the moment it was apparent the Obama admin was headed in the wrong direction - offering suggestion after suggestion about things that should be done that would be both popular and just.

And none of those things were done.

It's too late now, the only thing left to hope for is that getting shellacked will snap the party back to reality and produce real interest in what the people of this country actually want the government to do.

[spanone]

9. naw, i don't think it's one bit accurate.

it's projection...

[young but wise]

6. Nothing will make me feel better than to prove those bastards wrong.

[rocktivity]

7. I thought the mid-term elections were about a month away.

Did I sleep through them, or has CNN bought out the Psychic Network?

:crazy:
rocktivity

[rocktivity]

8. Permalink

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/10/06/gloria.borger.sweep/index.html



:headbang:
rocktivity

[spanone]

11. their main page looks like the day after the elections and we got trounced

even with a picture of Pelosi & Obama....how did they go into the future and take that pic? amazing cnn technology


The Sweep: What went wrong for Democrats

http://www.cnn.com/

[Atman]

12. I actully "joined" CNN.com just so I could leave a comment.

Alas, I hit "POST" and my comment disappeared, never to be seen again. Oh well. Fuck CNN.

.

[WeekendWarrior]

13. CNN has a new boss. The one who brought us Nancy Grace.

Expect things to get much uglier.

[The Backlash Cometh]

15. Well, that's settled then.

Let's ALL vote for the Republican-turned-Independents that are running against Democrats.

[spanone]

17. cnn has a new 'great' Obama/Pelosi picture on their webpage

ahh, and a fine picture of harry reid
The Sweep: What went wrong for Dems?



http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/

[whathehell]

16. Yup..It's why I don't watch it anymore...They're in the can for the R's..have been for awhile. n/t

[grantcart]

18. Borger is such and idiot. Even Rasmussen is showing significant tightening

http://ndn.org/blog/2010/10/2-new-polls-show-significant-7-point-gains-democrats

[AldebTX]

19. Wow...Call It Before the Election

Of course to do otherwise might make it look like they were unsure of themselves.

CNN has sunk a long way from their glory days......my brother said when they tried the hologram reporters in 2008, he knew it was completely over for them.

[tavalon]

20. Damn, I thought you were joking

[spanone]

21. wish that i were

[Warren DeMontague]

23. Apparently, CNN is adopting a post-modern approach to the flow of time.

Or maybe surrealist.

What 'went wrong' in the elections that haven't happened yet? Let me consult my palm reader. It's all together in the tomorrowyesterdayworld.