Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nikki Haley (R-SC) wants drug tests tied to unemployment benefits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:31 PM
Original message
Nikki Haley (R-SC) wants drug tests tied to unemployment benefits
Haley sought delay of family business audit
Haley proposes drug tests for unemployment beneficiaries
By JOHN O’CONNOR - joconnor@thestate.com


South Carolina’s more than 236,000 unemployed workers could have to take a drug test in order to receive jobless benefits, according to a proposal by Republican gubernatorial candidate Nikki Haley on Tuesday.

But Haley’s Democratic opponent, state Sen. Vincent Sheheen, criticized Haley for asking the state’s jobless agency — while a sitting lawmaker — to delay a 2005 audit of her parents’ clothing business. A former agency commissioner said Haley called her and requested the delay.

Former Employment Security commissioner Becky Richardson said Haley called her in 2005 to request the agency delay an audit of her parents’ business, Exotica International. Richardson said she received two similar requests in six years at the agency, but believed it was common to honor the requests.

snip//

The audit was one aspect of a day of back and forth bickering over the state’s bankrupt jobless benefits fund and who was to blame for running up $886.7 million in federal loans since December of 2008. Those debts will have to be repaid by S.C. businesses, and the loan interest could be paid by S.C. taxpayers.

Though employees fired for using drugs, alcohol or missing work can be disqualified from jobless benefits, Haley said testing the unemployed was one of several steps in ensuring the newly restructured Department of Employment and Workforce – now a cabinet agency – only pays benefits to those who have earned them.

“We will make sure, above all, that there will be no…benefits if they do not pass a drug test,” Haley said.


more...

http://www.thestate.com/2010/10/06/1499017/haley-drug-test-the-unemployed.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. But add the amendment that republican members of congress
and those running for office must take a test for mental capability they sure need it. Miller, Rand, O'Donnell, Angle, gee they would be lined up for so long we wouldn't get anything else done now would we.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Midway Rebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not surprising coming from a Rethuglican.
What was surprisng to me was to discover that there are a handful of folks around here that think this policy is a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Several more of them in the state legislature calling for the same thing
I'm not sure what drugs have to do with people losing their jobs because their employer no longer has the funding to employ them, as is the case for the vast majority of people who get laid off. Just more bullshit from another brain-dead, self-righteous asshole who thinks unemployment is the same as welfare.

As for the ones around here who think this is a good policy, it's obvious they've never had to experience being on unemployment. They're undoubtedly repug trolls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. how about we drug test gubernatorial candidates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. I want to drug test the rich since the government spends so much time
kissing their ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. my husband seems to think this is a good idea. and we are on state health insurance.
we don't do drugs, but i don't like the idea. it's already humiliating having to go ask for help. i say anyone in the government has to undergo random drug testing. i bet they don't have to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ok lets make a deal.
We drug test the unemployed when they put a Breathalyzer on the floor of both houses and make everyone blow into it before their allowed to speak. We won't stop anyone from speaking, we'll just post their blood alcohol level on c-span as they speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Haha! Great idea, will never happen. boner would blow it up! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. How about drug tests
to become a senator or representive. I wonder just how many of the republicans are addicted to both "legal" and illegal drugs, I bet its alot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC