Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AGAIN-help me reply to my congressmember in paper re:"OBAMACARE"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:10 PM
Original message
AGAIN-help me reply to my congressmember in paper re:"OBAMACARE"

Factual references,please.thank you in advance...especially for your sympathy

http://www.thedailylight.com/articles/2010/10/06/opinion/doc4cac9ff2540d6649282645.txt

Lawmakers ask governors to provide data on ObamaCare implementation
Published: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 11:35 AM CDT
WASHINGTON ��“ U.S. Reps. Joe Barton, R-Ennis/Arlington, John Shimkus, R-Ill., and Michael Burgess, R-Lewisville, Tuesday asked the 50 states’ governors and Washington, D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty, for data related to the implementation of the health care law. The Republican lawmakers are concerned that the cost of ObamaCare will cripple many states’ budgets.

“Much of the responsibility for ��“ and the cost of ��“ implementing these new provisions will fall to the states. Given the important role states play in implementing the legislation and the difficult budgetary situation in many states, Congress must understand the impact of the legislation on each state’s budget and what steps each state will take in order to finance these additional outlays,” wrote the Republican members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. “However, we know the best experts on this issue are the states themselves, and thus, we are requesting the assistance of all 50 states and the District of Columbia in order to better understand how this legislation will affect state budgets over the next several years.”

Below are the questions the lawmakers asked the states, and the District of Columbia, to provide within two weeks:

1. The projected total increase in outlays by your state that will result from P.L. 111-148 and P.L. 111-152. Please provide annual projections through at least 2023 and include all costs of compliance, including administrative costs. Please include a breakdown of staffing requirements, the cost of new enrollment systems (if needed by your state to accommodate the new enrollment and eligibility requirements), and an explanation of other administrative costs that may be incurred by the state.

2. The projected number of additional enrollees in your state’s Medicaid program and the resulting increase in state outlays that will result from the mandated expansion of Medicaid eligibility to 138 percent of the federal poverty level based on modified adjusted gross income (as defined in Section 1004 of P.L. 111-152) and the requirement for individuals to maintain minimum essential coverage (Sections 1501, 2001, and 10201 of P.L. 111-148 and Section 1201 of P.L. 111-152). Please provide annual projections at least through 2023 and divide your projections using the following categories: (1) the expansion population (individuals made newly eligible by the law); (2) the crowd-out population (individuals who: (a) will lose access to their current health insurance coverage and be automatically enrolled in Medicaid; (b) have private coverage but will drop it to enroll in Medicaid; and (c) individuals who will enroll in Medicaid after their employer drops coverage due to higher costs of providing coverage; and (3) the eligible-but-unenrolled population (individuals who were eligible for Medicaid coverage before passage of the law and enroll in Medicaid to avoid the penalty in Section 1501 of P.L. 111-148). As you may know, the state will immediately incur the full cost of the state match for the eligible-but-unenrolled population, including those who enroll this year. To the extent possible, please include an assumption as to the incremental cost of this population to the state in the current fiscal year, and in future years.

3. Given the increased percentage of items and services that will be financed by the Medicaid program in your state and the new definition of “medical assistance” imposed by Section 2304 of P.L. 111-148, do you anticipate that the state’s potential legal exposure will lead to increased reimbursement rates for Medicaid-covered items and services? If so, what impact do you project these increases will have on state Medicaid spending? Please provide annual projections at least through 2023. It would be helpful for you to describe your state’s perspective on the new, expansive definition of “medical assistance” and the legal exposure you perceive your state may have in the event a Medicaid beneficiary is unable to access a service due to low rates, now that Medicaid beneficiaries have the standing to file suit in federal court. Do you anticipate additional access-to-care suits being filed due to this new definition?

4. The projected reduction in federal Medicaid Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) payments (Section 1203 of P.L. 111-152). Please provide annual projections at least through 2023. The legislation provides broad latitude for the Secretary of HHS to establish how the reductions to DSH will take place. Please make your assumptions based on the available information. Given that each state uses DSH in different ways and that 23 million individuals will remain uninsured in 2019 according to the Congressional Budget Office, please describe how reductions to DSH will impact your safety-net hospitals.

5. The number of additional enrollees in the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Please provide annual projections of enrollment and state costs through 2016.

6. Under Section 10203 of P.L. 111-152, all federal funding for CHIP will expire on September 30, 2015. Do you anticipate that your state will continue providing CHIP coverage after federal funding for the program expires? If not, how do you anticipate providing coverage for these previously enrolled individuals? Please provide annual cost projections for this population from 2016 through 2023.

7. The projected cost of creating and operating an American Health Benefits Exchange (Section 1311 of P.L. 111-148). Please provide annual projections at least through 2023.

8. The projected impact on the costs of providing health insurance coverage to state employees and their eligible family members (Sections 1001, 1101, 1201, 1301, 1302, and 1513 of P.L. 111-148).

9. How your state anticipates it will finance the costs imposed by P.L. 111-148 and P.L. 111-152?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. I imagine I will start by thanking them for reinforcing the need for universal healthcare
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. My Response:
Thank you for pointing out so explicitly why we need a National Health Plan.There is no excuse for Texas to have 6.5 million uninsured adults and 5 million Medicaid recipients...not in The United States.
Physicians for a National Health Program has an excellent explanation of how this can happen.Thank you for wanting to learn more.It will simplify so much of what you have addressed.

http://www.pnhp.org/facts/single-payer-faq

Peace.
Beth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustAnotherGen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. A point I like to make is that
It's Not OBAMACARE. Members of the House and Senate got it passed with THEIR nuances - he just signed off on the legislation. Most people (most likely your Senator to) do not realize how a Bill becomes a Law. Presidents don't get to do things in a vacuum. :pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I brought that up in an earlier comment-Obamacare is what happens
when your congressmembers vote against your best interests...and told them to thank Barton for that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. You're right, Congessman/woman. The American people didn't want Obamacare...
...the wanted Medicare for all. What have you done to advance their interest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. well,one of my neighbors commented to Me
Stan4d wrote on Oct 6, 2010 5:52 PM:

" Beth...
PNHP Board of President O. Fein M.D.:
President Dr. Fein's work has focused on health system delivery reform on both the national and local levels. On the national level, he was a Robert Wood Johnson Health Policy Fellow from 1993 to 1994, when he worked as a legislative assistant in the office of Senate Democratic Majority Leader, George Mitchell.


I stopped there. Saw much more but found a disturbing lack of mainstream America. Most had socialist/progressive backgrounds.

Could you please cite one “Moderate” or unbiased souce as a reference Beth? Provided you can find one that addresses the Fact (that 20 States are suing over) that the Constitution does not provide for the Federal Government to enter as caretaker role in the lives of American Citizens. "




I replied that I only had myself-listed my experiences in 25 years of nursing,referred him to ama,state,and federal statistics ,how many uninsured and medicaid we had,how many with no dental care..and told him-maybe we should just let these people drop dead...that'll teach them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. There is one point. Good health shouldn't be something only the wealthy can buy.
The cost of improving the system doesn't matter when lives are at stake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC