Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

As if you needed another reason to despise Republicans.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 05:23 PM
Original message
As if you needed another reason to despise Republicans.....
from Grist:




"Is it just me, or is it hard to argue against writing the next chapter in American innovation?"

That was U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood on Twitter yesterday. He was talking about an article in the The New York Times on Republican gubernatorial candidates in several states who have vowed to reject federal stimulus funds for passenger rail projects.

According to the Times piece, candidates from California to Florida are lining up to say no to federal funding, and to the high-speed inter-city rail network that's been a centerpiece of the Obama administration's transportation policy:

In Wisconsin, which got more than $810 million in federal stimulus money to build a train line between Milwaukee and Madison, Scott Walker, the Milwaukee County executive and Republican candidate for governor, has made his opposition to the project central to his campaign.

Mr. Walker, who worries that the state could be required to spend $7 million to $10 million a year to operate the trains once the line is built, started a Web site, NoTrain.com, and has run a television advertisement in which he calls the rail project a boondoggle. "I'm Scott Walker," he says in the advertisement, "and if I'm elected as your next governor, we'll stop this train."


It's not just Walker. As the Times reports, John Kasich in Ohio, Rick Scott in Florida, and Meg Whitman in California are all declaring their intentions to say no to hundreds of millions of federal stimulus dollars for rail -- citing concerns over future costs to their states as well as skepticism about rail in general.

The Times notes that many of the candidates in question would be happy to see the money go to roads, although the law does not allow that. ..........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.grist.org/article/2010-10-06-republican-gubernatorial-candidates-line-up-to-say-no-to-federal/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. And if the law stipulated that money go for roads, they would be against that.
Why do they hate America and Americans so? What did we ever do to them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. John Fascisht - "You're not going to get that train".
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 05:58 PM by HughBeaumont
Yet this moron wants to phase out Ohio's state income tax . . . over 40% of this state's revenue, with no plan as to how the shortfall will be made up or if it will bring businesses here or if present businesses will start hiring. I guess we all just gotta have FAITH.

Ohio - get new shoes for your bullet wounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think we've had enough federal money go to roads.
It fed a nasty habit for too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puzzler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. One of the big GOP talking points against rail ...
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 06:08 PM by Puzzler
... is to make a false comparison between Europe and the US. The anti-rail argument says that Europe is smaller and has a larger population than the US. True, but the main point of Obama's rail program is to uses several smaller, more localized high-speed rail systems within the US: San Francisco/LA/San Diego, for example.

If the GOP objects to public funding for transport. Fair enough. As long as NO more public money goes to roads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Sports stadiums as well?
please..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. They are against everything!
Assholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. And died in the wool republican commentators
are saying the Democrats are at fault. Like Ed Rollins. He says Democrats lost their steam. Well the House passes very good damn bills, but when they get to the Senate the out of date rules let the republican minority hold up everything. I bet if the republicans took over the senate they first thing they would do is get rid of the filibuster and the 60 vote rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. if they don't want it send it to NY.we could use a faster way to get from downstate to upstate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC