Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EUREKA... O'Dolnnel is privy to classified info

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:30 PM
Original message
EUREKA... O'Dolnnel is privy to classified info
on the Chinese plans....

I think she does...

US Chamber of commerce<-----------------

What are the chances she's seen paperwork and that this PROPRIETARY info actually fell into her hands, or she had conversations wiht the US Chamber of Commerce where words to that effect were used?

If that is the case... hell of dot connecting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't it much more likely....
that she is simply the delusional fruitbat she seems to be, and has no "secret knowledge" of anything other than what the voices in her head tell her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Local chamber of commerce does talk to candidates
most candidates keep mum.

I am almost willing to bet that this is where this is coming from.

And if this became a legal case (in an alternate reality)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Sorry but local COC isn't going to have ANY CLUE about "Chinese takeover plans".
It's one thing to connect the dots. It's quite another to pull them out of one's butt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. If you say so
that is why they put out alerts that are quite detailed over email...

You think the material they gave to candidates are not even more detailed?

I am betting this is where this privy info is coming from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. SIGH. There is NO privy info. Period.
Edited on Wed Oct-06-10 06:42 PM by arbusto_baboso
"Chinese takeover" talk is really as paranoid and batshit crazy at it sounds.

It's even worse than the talk of Soviet takeover we enduired during the Cold War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Which if you remember some of the right wing crazees
also said they had privy info.

I am not saying the info is correct... just telling you where it most likely is coming from.

By the way that also means it is not classified...

Paranoia, plus COC hand outs, + privy... there... but this is where it is coming from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Okay, I misunderstood you. Sorry.
But who can actually tell where anything in O'Donnell's "mind" is coming from?

I still think she was just making shit up. It's what that type does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Yeah but usually the stuff they make up
have something of a grain of actual source in there.

It is just finding out what that source is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. +100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. pretty much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's more likely that she's just making shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Did you hear why she said she heard it? She worked with missionaries who had been in China
and of course, missionaries can find out all sorts of classified info from the Chinese government.

My question is, if she has this info shouldn't she take it to the State Department?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yeah I heard that
but I am betting this is where it is coming.

And by the way it is as correct as missionaries... like not at all.

That said we have been known to use deep cover agents in other's territory... and missionaries could be a real cover... not that one with that cover would go speak to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theothersnippywshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. Schezuan Bat Shit Stir Fry. How very Republican. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mysuzuki2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-10 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. Attn Christine:
It is not classified information just because you read it on the "privvy" wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC