Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BWAHAHAHA - PPP Poll: Uncle Joe LIEberman TRAILING VERY BADLY In 2012 Re-Election Bid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 11:22 AM
Original message
BWAHAHAHA - PPP Poll: Uncle Joe LIEberman TRAILING VERY BADLY In 2012 Re-Election Bid
:applause: :rofl: :applause: :rofl: :applause: :rofl: :applause: :rofl:

:applause: :rofl: :applause: :rofl: :applause: :rofl: :applause: :rofl:

:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:



" A new survey of Connecticut by Public Policy Polling (D) provides a fascinating look into the possible future of independent Sen. Joe Lieberman. To be exact, the former Democrat is incredibly unpopular with most voters -- and only marginally popular with Republicans -- and would have a hard time avoiding a landslide defeat should he run again in 2012.



Lieberman's political journey over the last four years has sure alienated a lot of folks. After he lost the 2006 Democratic primary, he was then re-elected as an independent with unofficial Republican support. He then campaigned aggressively for John McCain for president in 2008, and spoke at the Republican National Convention -- but after McCain lost, he settled back into place in the Democratic caucus. Then he helped to stop the public option during the health care debate, promising to support a Republican filibuster, but also voted for final passage of the eventual law sans public option.


Lieberman's approval rating stands at only 31%, with 57% disapproval -- even lower than the 36%-54% for Sen. Chris Dodd, who is retiring. Broken down by party, Lieberman's rating is 20%-69% among Democrats, 46%-41% among Republicans, and 31%-56% among independents.


Respondents were also asked this question: "Generally speaking in 2012 will you vote to reelect Joe Lieberman or would you rather replace him with someone else?" The answer was only 24% to re-elect him, against 66% who would vote to replace him.


PPP also tested three-way race for Lieberman, Rep. Chris Murphy as the Democratic nominee and Republican financial commentator and Ron Paul activist Peter Schiff (who recently came in third place in the Republican primary for Senate) as the Republican candidate. The result was Murphy 39%, Schiff 25%, and Lieberman 19%.


Another three-way race put in Gov. Jodi Rell, who is retiring this year with relatively decent approval ratings, as the Republican candidate. This time it's Murphy 37%, Rell 29%, and Lieberman 17%.


In a direct two-way match, Murphy leads Lieberman by 47%-33%.


"Democrats, Republicans, and independents in Connecticut agree on one thing: they want Joe Lieberman replaced in the US Senate," writes PPP president Dean Debnam. "His path to reelection, at least at this point a couple years away, looks extremely difficult."


<http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/ppp-poll-joe-lieberman-losing-very-badly-for-2012-re-election-bid.php?ref=dcblt>


.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. wooooohoooooo !!...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. LIEberman.... blech... gross man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Republicans did not support their own nominee in 2006
If their Senate nominee in 2006 had won a majority of Republican voters, I suspect Ned Lamont would have prevailed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. lamont would have won easily
it was a close race with republicans going more than 80% for lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Droopy Dog does whats best for Droopy Dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
littlewolf Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. that is 2 years out ... can we PLEASE stay on 2010 right now please ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Right on. I think so too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. This is the GENERAL DISCUSSION Board in case you missed the sign on the door.
There are many OTHER discussion topics on this board that are also " 2 years out "....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. No. Lieberman is the reason we need more Democratic Senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. Lieberman won the classic pyrrhic victory in 2006
He's destined for retirement after 2012, and I'd like to see the Democrats exclude him from their Senate caucus in the next biennium and to hell with his "with us on everything but voting" posturing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. Definitly time for LIeberman to spend more time with his family. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. People angry about the public option need to stop bellyaching over Obama
and look at Senators like Lieberman who are the reason that compromise was unavoidable. There's no good reason for the misplaced blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Obama never even called him
Obama flew to Kucinich's district in Ohio to campaign for HCR, but he never even picked up the phone to call Lieberman on HCR. And when the leadership was considering removing him from his leadership position, Obama told them to give him a pass. Lieberman is a creation of the whole DLC/New Democrat machinery of which Obama is a part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
15.  People angry about the public option need to keep working to kick out all the corporate
obstructionists until we get the Public Option AKA universal SINGLE PAYER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. +10000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. He never intended to be reelected. It was all about setting himself up for a lucrative lobbying job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. Maybe he "term-limited" himself when he ran last time
Many people probably regretted voting for him, and he probably only won because republicans shoved him down the throats of Connecticut voters because their guy was worse than Joementum. I think republicans voted for him to punish dems who finally had had enough of him and were thinking they would be rid of him.. we all know how ornery republicans can be.

Murphy needs to get busy & hopefully Joementum will decide to retire:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. Please help Joe retire. He deserves a rest, and I'm sure he has saved enough money
for a decent life in his golden years...



mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
19.  Joementum has served HIS masters well over the years will be rewarded after he's
been given the electorate boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. God grant he lie still....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC