Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Will Not Sign Bill Seen As Cover For Bank Foreclosures

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 01:41 PM
Original message
Obama Will Not Sign Bill Seen As Cover For Bank Foreclosures
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/07/obama-pocket-veto-foreclosures_n_753987.html

UPDATE: The White House announced Thursday afternoon that President Obama would not sign a bill that some consumer advocates worried would make it more difficult for homeowners to fight fraudulent foreclosures.

The White House noted that the bill was designed to ease restrictions on interstate commerce. "While we share this goal, we believe it is necessary to have further deliberations about the intended and unintended impact of this bill on consumer protections, including those for mortgages, before this bill can be finalized."

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), chairman of the Judiciary Committee, moved the legislation through the Senate without debate on Sept. 27.

"Senator Leahy understands the President's decision not to sign the Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act, and he supports that decision," said a Leahy spokeswoman in a statement. "When Congress passed the legislation, no concerns or objections had been expressed. Now that concerns have been raised, Congress should reexamine whether this bill might have an unintended impact on foreclosures in the future. We certainly do not believe that is what Representative Aderholt and the other cosponsors of the legislation intended."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Boy my skepticism is at an all time high
This just smells of a "deal" where this was allowed to pass through knowing full well that it would meet this fate. Mind you, I'm glad it did. But Leahy's comments are very strange. It's almost as if he requested, up front, that this be vetoed so he didn't have to fight it at his level. If congress ever wants to know where its bad reputation comes from, it can start here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We will just have to watch what info trickles out.
Watch Talk Radio News service and the bloggers. Might get some good gossip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Anyone know the votes on the bill
or the name of the bill to look it up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. HR 3808 passed both houses on voice vote, no votes recorded.
Apr 27, 2010: This bill passed in the House of Representatives by voice vote. A record of each representative’s position was not kept.
Sep 27, 2010: This bill passed in the Senate by Unanimous Consent. A record of each senator’s position was not kept.

Sponsor:

Rep. Robert Aderholt Cosponsors:
Bruce Braley
Michael Castle
Artur Davis

2 Alabama Reps. supported it, the first introduced it!
That Artur Davis guy was supposed to be a "go " Dem.
Glad I know that about him now.


Link for looking up bills and tracking them:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-3808
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. What cowards
they can all claim that the 'voice' wasn't them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oops. Dupe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC