Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SHHH Obama will NOT sign that foreclosure bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 02:47 PM
Original message
SHHH Obama will NOT sign that foreclosure bill
my IPOD chirped, so I descided to pass it along.

MSNBC

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39556377/ns/business-real_estate/

Obama won't sign foreclosure challenge bill
Law moved quickly through Congress as complaints over banks' behavior grew
advertisement | ad info

By Caren Bohan and Scot J. Paltrow

updated 1 hour 31 minutes ago
Share Print Font:
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama will not sign legislation that could have made it more difficult for homeowners to challenge unjustified foreclosure actions, the White House said on Thursday.

White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer said Obama was sending the bill back to the House of Representatives for further discussion of how it would affect the foreclosure crisis, which has become a political lightning rod amid media reports that banks acted improperly to evict struggling borrowers.

----

Sharing some good nooze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. They sure tried to sneak it by didn't they?!
I'm delighted Obama sent it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Saw that...
I've been discussing it elsewhere.

This is good news. It is a simple bill but open to abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Interesting that I recced this post, and it is still at zero.
Very interesting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Fixed that for you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 02:57 PM
Original message
Not any more
Rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I really do not give a fuck anymore about the unreccer brigade
I am sure there are some folks running scrips at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wonderful News!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. So, if you contacted the White House to complain about the bill--
--make another contact to thank Obama for listening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kick and Rec!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. not signing it *yet*.
Obama was sending the bill back to the House of Representatives for further discussion of how it would affect the foreclosure crisis, which has become a political lightning rod amid media reports that banks acted improperly to evict struggling borrowers.

"We believe it is necessary to have further deliberations about the intended and unintended impact of this bill on consumer protections, including those for mortgages, before this bill can be finalized," Pfeiffer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Green_Lantern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. he vetoed it ...it was a pocket veto...
The glass is half full.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. rec..not signing is not veto..this needs to be veto'ed! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. It will not come out this session so effectively it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC