All we need do with nuclear waste is dilute it to a low radiation level and sprinkle it over the oce

[tabatha]

"All we need do with nuclear waste is dilute it to a low radiation level and sprinkle it over the ocean - or even over America after hor-mesis is better understood and verified with respect to more diseases. We leave it as an exercise for the reader to guess how long it will take the failure of the no-threshold hypothesis to reach your television set."

That is the last paragraph of the newsletter (and a conclusion/summation) by Art Robinson here:
http://www.accesstoenergy.com/view/atearchive/s76a2275.htm

It is in the archives here:
http://www.accesstoenergy.com/view/atearchive/

with the main site here:
http://www.accesstoenergy.com/

Rachel did her homework, once again.

[Honeycombe8]

1. It could be packaged in metal and buried in Cheney's lawn.

He doesn't let people walk on his lawn, anyway.

[AlabamaLibrul]

2. It was a killer segment. She asked if he had ever done a satellite interview before

as the delay led to him accusing her of "sarcasm" about 25 times, she explained the delay, and he said something to say....

About the speed of light.

What?

[tabatha]

5. yep, and he says he is a good scientist

and fails on high school science

[leveymg]

3. " . . . sprinkle it over" ice cream eaten by the board members of Exelon Corp.

Then, I'd be persuaded this nuclear waste disposal plan is safe.

[Radical Activist]

4. Right along with the fairy dust.

[Spazito]

6. That was one hell of an interview...

Kudos to Rachel for inviting him so millions could see this nutcase.

It was jawdropping! :wow:

[hunter]

7. We do it with fossil fuel waste. Why not?

:sarcasm:

[kristopher]

8. Typical right wing reasoning from a typical right wing flake. nt