Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Activism of Thomas’s Wife Could (make that SHOULD) Raise Judicial Issues

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-10 09:09 AM
Original message
Activism of Thomas’s Wife Could (make that SHOULD) Raise Judicial Issues
Activism of Thomas’s Wife Could Raise Judicial Issues

full story here:
Stephen Crowley/ The New York Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/09/us/politics/09thomas.html?_r=2&th&emc=th



Virginia Thomas, left, of the organization Liberty Central, and Diana Reimer, in May lobbying against the health care bill.

RICHMOND, Va. — As one of the keynote speakers here Friday at a state convention billed as the largest Tea Party event ever, Virginia Thomas gave the throng of more than 2,000 activists a full-throated call to arms for conservative principles.

For three decades, Mrs. Thomas has been a familiar figure among conservative activists in Washington — since before she met her husband of 23 years, Justice Clarence Thomas of the Supreme Court. But this year she has emerged in her most politically prominent role yet: Mrs. Thomas is the founder and head of a new nonprofit group, Liberty Central, dedicated to opposing what she characterizes as the leftist “tyranny” of President Obama and Democrats in Congress and to “protecting the core founding principles” of the nation.

It is the most partisan role ever for a spouse of a justice on the nation’s highest court, and Mrs. Thomas is just getting started. “Liberty Central will be bigger than the Tea Party movement,” she told Fox News in April, at a Tea Party rally in Atlanta.

<snip>

This month, Liberty Central began what it called its first ad campaign, but the ads were limited to Web sites for the conservative talk-show hosts Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin — suggesting an effort to build membership for Liberty Central, not elect candidates. The ads link to Liberty Central’s Web site and a video of Mrs. Thomas soliciting 100,000 signatures against the “Obama tax increase” — referring to the scheduled expiration of the Bush tax cuts on Dec. 31.

The bigger question for many is how she is financing these activities. Liberty Central reported the initial $550,000 on its 2009 tax return, though the identities of the two donors are redacted.

<snip>


Mrs. Thomas’s political work has drawn criticism before from Democrats. In the weeks before a 5-to-4 majority of the Supreme Court, including her husband, decided the 2000 election for George W. Bush over Al Gore, Mrs. Thomas was compiling résumés for potential appointees to a Bush administration from her job at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative, Republican-leaning research group.

Mrs. Thomas’s supporters said she plays an important role as a bridge between grass-roots Tea Party activists and establishment Republicans in Washington. Ryan Hecker, a lawyer in Houston and a prominent Tea Party activist, said he had heard that Liberty Central was “doing a big get-out-the-vote effort” in some Congressional races. Despite the suspicion of many in the Tea Party that Republicans in Washington are trying to co-opt the movement, Mr. Hecker said the “charismatic and very genuine” Mrs. Thomas is not seen that way among activists.

“She’s been there for a long time, but she hasn’t been corrupted by it,” Mr. Hecker said. So she can be “a medium” to get the grass-roots’ views “to the people that matter.”


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-10 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. how can she get away with this? we can't let her get away with it.
Edited on Sat Oct-09-10 09:29 AM by ensho
there has got to be laws about this surely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gaedel Donating Member (802 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-10 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. On DU?
Trashing a woman who has a career separate from her husband? We may not like what Clarence Thjomas does and we may not like what she does, but to pass a law against her being involved?

Should Tipper Gore not have spoken out or become involved with a cause when her husband was a senator or vice-president?

If a liberal justice's wife was involved wih a liberal think tank would we say the same?

Stay in the kitchen Mrs Thomas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-10 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. There are but no body has the guts to go against her AND
she knows it. Seems like if you are a republican you can do anything. Reference Ann Coulter and voter fraud in Florida, Ensign and his illegally getting that lobbyist job and paying a bribe to his mistress husband. And Rush and his oxy flinger in Florida. I could go on an on adding Tom Delay who has most of the jail serving time counts thrown out against him. But it has been about five years since he had to resign because of all the illegal activities. I guess they thought the longer they waited people wouldn't be interest any more. Look at all the illegal activities of Rove and the attorneys firings and all that was thrown. As I said, if you are a republican you can do as you please and get away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-10 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R! //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-10 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. Impeach the silent turdball.
And while they're at it, impeach Scalia, Kennedy, Alito and Roberts, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-10 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. We need to impeach him. He's a disgrace to the court. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-10 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. The separation of powers demands impartiality between the branches, right?
I know even federal employees are forbidden to get involved in political work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC