Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's talk about Cannabis

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 06:09 PM
Original message
Let's talk about Cannabis
Cannabis (Cannabis Sativa and Cannabis Indica for the specific) is a plant. It grows wild in some places (often the third, and wild variety, Cannabis Ruderalis) and in many others, under strict hydroponic conditions. It can grow outdoors as well.

Now - this plant is illegal, and only so because of propaganda. The original reason Marijuana was outlawed in the US (and shortly thereafter, everywhere else) is because of racism and pressure from the cotton industry (hemp was a major competitor.) The fear-baiters of yesteryear (about 1906 or so) warned congress of it promoting "jazz" and "wild-eyed negro-ism." Like I said, racist reasons.

The funny thing is that it in itself is not illegal, and fully legal if you have a 'Marijuana Tax Stamp.' Of course, you can't get one.

It's time to reverse this crappy law. Cannabis does not cause brain damage, wild-eyeness, or any other contrived symptom. Smoked, it does hurt your lungs. So do smog, cigarettes and ragweed (at least for some of us.) There are alternatives: eat in a brownie or vaporize. Other than that, it generally makes some people mellow, and some people paranoid. If it makes you the latter DON'T DO IT. Similar to shellfish for those allergic.

It has been known to reduce pain for those with constant pain, treat symptoms of thousands of diseases (MS for example, cancer for another and glaucoma for yet another.)

Proposition 19 will change this stupid law - legalize small amounts of cannabis. I'm urging you to vote yes if you life in California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Yeshuah Ben Joseph Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Man made pills. God made pot.
Who do you trust? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Of course but remember 'G0d' also made Hemlock
But Bob Dobbs gave us slack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Given "god's" track record...
I am beginning to wonder :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. I only regret that I can only vote yes once....
Edited on Mon Oct-11-10 06:16 PM by mike_c
So I'll just have to content myself with firing one up to celebrate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah, it's not like in Chicago
We're the motto is to vote early and often, a nod to one of the early corrupted systems of voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm against it.
The only reason is the shitty testing. Current testing can't determine if it was used two weeks ago or an hour ago. For those of us in dangerous jobs, this is a problem. I don't care who uses pot, but I do care when they use it. Not that my opinion matters, since I'm in Missouri.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Well, don't use it and fly planes!
I think the problem is in the exact dangerous job. Not the drug.

I mean, you wouldn't do a shot of tequila before flying a plane either!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I wouldn't want to be on the plane if the pilot is stoned.
I'm not the problem, the irresponsible people I work with are. I haven't smoked pot since I was in my teens - 30+ years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Well the irresponsible will always be irresponsible
But if 420 makes them crazy, I'm sure sugar, sex or tanning booths also play a part.

Thing is, the stuff has no known harmful effects, unless you smoke it. Which you don't have to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. You're not making any sense to me.
Are you stoned right now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. No - but tell me exactly why do you think legalization of pot is a bad idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I believe any testing ability will change/improve, become more accurate, as MJ; is/was illegal,
Edited on Mon Oct-11-10 06:53 PM by Uncle Joe
there is/was little need to determine when it is/was used.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oregon State Rep. Peter Buckley said he would like to have a rational discussion about marijuana
...when he noted that he would like to put legalization on the Oregon state ballot in 2011.

Yes, there are dangers for certain people - just as there are dangers with alcohol. People need to know if they are in a particular risk group.

Teenagers don't need to get high on cannabis. Legalization, regulation and sales outlets that are required to follow the law will help reduce access - and penalties for supplying teens with cannabis are intact with Prop. 19 - unless that teen is undergoing chemo, etc. and has a medical marijuana card.

However, cannabis as a recreational intoxicant is less dangerous and harmful than alcohol. Millions of people can and do use both substances and lead productive lives. Those who have problems can seek help, just as they do with alcohol. Sales of cannabis via legal outlets will remove its proximity to other illegal and more dangerous substances.

Why spend money putting people in jail because of cannabis? Why not obtain some tax revenues in the same way that alcohol and cigarettes are taxed - rather than have people spend money based upon the danger of engaging in an illegal business.

I cannot understand what's so difficult to get about the reasonableness of legalization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Which one gives you the "ups", and which one "lays you back"?
I call the first one "busy weed". My brother tried to explain it to me years ago, but I can't remember which is which... Yeah, I know how that sounds... :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I think Sativa is 'busy weed'
More THC, much more of an 'up' high.

Great for listening to music and folding laundry.

Indica is the 'tired' weed.


I think....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Thank you. I think that's what my brother said, but wasn't sure.
Edited on Mon Oct-11-10 07:16 PM by Pathwalker
I've been saying for decades that we need to legalize it, and tax it. It still makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Think of the tourism possibilities
And at a time like now, a trip to California will be nice and cheap :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, Taverner.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. There is something really really wrong with the tax stamp that was never intended to be.
But they couldn't think of any other legal way to make it illegal.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 07:34 PM
Original message
i have an Afghan seed....
according to a reliable source it`s happy grass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-11-10 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. i have an Afghan seed....
according to a reliable source it`s happy grass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-12-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
22. Yet it cannot make Dane Cook funny. Sweet lord I've tried. He's STILL not funny stoned...
n.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC