Now Lawrence O'Donnell is destroying Ron Paul

[HughMoran]

Damn, he kicks ass lately.

[hlthe2b]

1. Ron or Rand? If, Ron, what has he done lately to make news?

[HughMoran]

3. Nothing - well, he just made news tonight

lol - Lawrence kicked his ass and made him look like a foolish old hypocrite who's afraid to answer a direct question.

[ClassWarrior]

7. He sired Rand. Isn't that enough of a natural disaster to warrant some coverage?

:shrug:

NGU.

[elleng]

2. Ron

[HughMoran]

4. uh-oh, now he's got Alvin Greene on

lol - this could be interesting!

[HipChick]

5. oh boy..Turtle? No

[HughMoran]

6. This guy is so awkward, he makes me laugh nervously

:rofl:

[Manifestor_of_Light]

8. Probably the most excitement Clute, Texas, h as seen in a while.

Ron Paul refused to answer O'Donnell when he asked about desegregation and civil rights laws, and whether the property owner had the right to refuse to serve blacks, and also about whether he was in favor of term limits, and in favor of eliminating Medicaid.

Ron Paul said he wanted those people on Medicaid to "become self-sufficient" and that Medicare/Medicaid was going bankrupt.

How in the hell would he expect disabled people to "become self-sufficient"??? :wtf:


I LOOOVE Lawrence O'Donnell just as much as I love Keith and Rachel.

[Pisces]

9. He did not destroy Ron Paul, in fact, I thought Lawrence looked condescending

I think Ron held his own on this one.

[ClassWarrior]

10. Ewwww... He "held his own?" What didn't the camera see??

:rofl:

And by the way, you're wrong. Barney Fife looked like a sputtering fool.

NGU.

[Pisces]

11. I am no Ron Paul fan, but that was not an ass kicking. I call them like I see them.

[HughMoran]

12. Considering Ron wouldn't answer a question and dodged everything

I thought Ron was arrogant AND condescending. I guess it depends on whether one is a Ron Paul fan or not.

[FrenchieCat]

13. Wow! That would make me question you.....

Ron Paul was sooo confusing!

He was asked about term limits, and when asked why his ass was still in the same job since 1970....
Ron Paul changed to ...."it depends"...like wtf is that supposed to even mean?

Than he was asked a question on his stance on the Civil Rights Amendment of 1964, and he answered by bringing up property rights! WTF is that supposed to even mean? That civil rights were less important than property rights....cause one could not tell by listening to him, what he was trying to say....just this little voice that sounded like a stupid person who can't answer a question head on.

Then he was asked about Medicare, and Ron's confusing ass started talking about no foreign wars and what "Obama's" doing.....and how he would "transition to something else 20 to 25 years from now, so we don't have to worry about it now, cause it would be different" type bullshit....and wouldn't even call the President, President.

Ron Paul came off sounding like a little small cartoon character who's only routine is to say...."let me answer the question, ok", although that's exactly what O'Donnel was letting him do.

I will admit that O'Donell had Ron Paul where he wanted him; not making a single fucking lick of sense!

The fact that you think Ron Paul held his own, with his little silly whiny assholy self, tells me more about you than I'd ever want to know.

[Pisces]

14. I am not defending Ron Paul. I just do not think he had his ass handed to him.

You can see if you care to do a search on me that I am no Ron Paul fan. I just didn't see him get the beat down that some did. Like most libertarians, Ron Paul gets caught up in a lot of circular arguments.

[la la]

15. if bouncing off walls and

changing subjects is okay - then i guess ronnie was okay--no wonder rand is such an idjet- runs in the whole famdamly!